Herby stated in a post that indiana isn't as good as people think and we match up very well with the following lineup...
1) gesell or clemmons
2) marble
3) white
4) olaseni
5) woodbury
I could see olaseni and woodbury playing together at times but this lineup has on 2 ball handlers and very little outside shooting. We struggled with white at the 3 and he has played it almost none lately. I think we dictate more match up problems with white at the 4. Like I said with the development of olaseni lately I could see him playing next to woody against big plodding teams but indiana isn't like that. So I do not believe it will happen with this exact lineup (at least not against indiana). I could see it maybe against an msu who is a slower style team.
A lineup like this will be more likely next yr with uthoff at the 3 and marble at the 2 as uthoff is a better ball handler and wing player than white is.
1) gesell or clemmons
2) marble
3) white
4) olaseni
5) woodbury
I could see olaseni and woodbury playing together at times but this lineup has on 2 ball handlers and very little outside shooting. We struggled with white at the 3 and he has played it almost none lately. I think we dictate more match up problems with white at the 4. Like I said with the development of olaseni lately I could see him playing next to woody against big plodding teams but indiana isn't like that. So I do not believe it will happen with this exact lineup (at least not against indiana). I could see it maybe against an msu who is a slower style team.
A lineup like this will be more likely next yr with uthoff at the 3 and marble at the 2 as uthoff is a better ball handler and wing player than white is.