Had to work last night, just watched second half. Am I high or could our second out unit beat the starters 2 out 3 most nights. Take Keegan out and it would be 3 out of 3. Sandfort needs to start. Kris needs to be first or second off the bench. Perkins or Ulis should start. The end.
Well let's leave Keegan with the 4 starters from last night, then put him with the next 4 and decide who's better.
Keegan vs Keegan is obviously a wash.
Joe T vs Ulis - I'd say that's pretty much a wash with possibly a slight edge to Joe T.
Bohannon vs Perkins- I think that even of Bohannon is a better offensive player (tough to know for sure at this point because Perkins is doing it against bad teams) Perkins is a considerably better defensive player. Advantage Perkins.
Connor vs Sandford - pretty sure Sandford is a better all around player and it's probably not even close. It's probably a bit closer than it looks due to Connor's intangibles that are hard to measure. But even with those, its probably not close.
Flip vs Kris - Flip might be a bit better at defending the 5, but other than that, Kris probably has him on every other aspect of the game. I give the advantage to Kris here.
Seems to me the 4 backups are an upgrade over the 4 starters. Again, it's bad competition, but the starters are playing the same bad teams as the backups are. The easiest way to put it is the backups sure do seem like they are better scorers than the starters, and when you look at defense and see that 2 of the starters are Bohannon and Connor, it's tough to make the argument that the starters are better at that end of the court.