ibahawkeye
Well-Known Member
They haven't run a spread offense for 5 years now, genius.
No **** Sherlock.... The point was they now are about ready to try a 3rd coach after firing Carr.
Point being.... Hiring a new coach doesn't guarantee success.
They haven't run a spread offense for 5 years now, genius.
Correct. But keeping a crappy one does guarantee crap. /ThreadNo **** Sherlock.... The point was they now are about ready to try a 3rd coach after firing Carr.Point being.... Hiring a new coach doesn't guarantee success.
Correct. But keeping a crappy one does guarantee crap. /Thread
And as many other people have pointed out, Davis is not the problem. It goes higher up the foodchain.Sure if nothing changes....but as ive said in other threads Kirk has my support if and only if he gets rid of Davis.
And as many other people have pointed out, Davis is not the problem. It goes higher up the foodchain.
Yeah, nobody ever made that comment during the KOK era. Seriously, you've only been an Iowa fan for like 3 years, right?There have been so many games during the Davis tenure that I thought the D did it's part but the offense didn't hold up their end.
Hire Bob Stoops and the fans will come.
Well then it's a good thing that he doesn't make anywhere near that much money now.Dream on. Iowa will never ever pay $8-9M for a head football coach(s). Just insane to think that.
Well then it's a good thing that he doesn't make anywhere near that much money now.
Talk about not using your brain (assuming you have one). The only way Stoops comes here is if he's tired of Oklahoma. It would not be a money issue, thus we would not need to outspend them.See that's what wrong around here, people don't use their brains to think. Think about what Iowa will have to pay Ferentz each year (75% $2.75m). Think about Stoops current salary $5.15 and the bump Iowa will have to give.
Talk about not using your brain (assuming you have one). The only way Stoops comes here is if he's tired of Oklahoma. It would not be a money issue, thus we would not need to outspend them.
We would not get into a bidding war with them, moron. We wouldn't have to. He either wants to come back home, or he doesn't. Money would have absolutely no role in the equation. And do you have any idea what the annual revenue for the athletic department is? The money you are talking about is a drop in the bucket. There are homeless people on the Ped Mall with a deeper grasp of UI athletic department finances than you have.LOL Stoops takes a cut in pay? You are mental. It's $7.9M to pay both if Stoops does not take a pay raise. Plus year cost of living raises. Jesus I'm tire of spoon feeding you.
Next year is going to be ugly.... On MANY fronts.
We would not get into a bidding war with them, moron. We wouldn't have to. He either wants to come back home, or he doesn't. Money would have absolutely no role in the equation. And do you have any idea what the annual revenue for the athletic department is? The money you are talking about is a drop in the bucket. There are homeless people on the Ped Mall with a deeper grasp of UI athletic department finances than you have.
I think Chicago has gone from having about 8-10 Hawk bars to 2 that I can think of off the top of my head (Theory and Merkles - both of which have Hawk alum owners). Many of the bars with no ties and just trolling for drunks to come in on Saturday have all flipped to Wisconsin or MSU bars, and I think one flipped to Illinois after a change in ownership (Illini grad bought it, IIRC).
No **** Sherlock.... The point was they now are about ready to try a 3rd coach after firing Carr.
Point being.... Hiring a new coach doesn't guarantee success.