in 3 ncaa tourney games, Villanova has won each by 20+ points, and I'm not sure they've trailed at all in the tournament either. I read alot of the reactions to Iowa's loss to them on sunday. I remain disappointed in the game, as I thought at the least we would be competitive in the game, and had a chance to win. I was in Brooklyn for the tournament, and have now seen them play in all 3 games. Clearly, a lot of people underestimated Villanova.
My question is, does Villanova's performance to date change our collective opinions of how the season ended for the Hawks? Maybe our loss was as much as or more a reflection of Villanova being THAT much better than we thought?
I truly did think we had at least a puncher's chance of winning on sunday. I thought at least to some extent Iowa simply folded in the game. Now, I'm not sure if I wasn't giving Villanova enough credit.
Thoughts?
My question is, does Villanova's performance to date change our collective opinions of how the season ended for the Hawks? Maybe our loss was as much as or more a reflection of Villanova being THAT much better than we thought?
I truly did think we had at least a puncher's chance of winning on sunday. I thought at least to some extent Iowa simply folded in the game. Now, I'm not sure if I wasn't giving Villanova enough credit.
Thoughts?