Trump supporters, how do you square this?

[PCHawk]

Big difference in no major health issues and healthy people. What exactly are you getting at here? Do you need details and doctor's charts on everyone or are you just writing a book?

The post I just wrote pretty much answers this. I'm seriously just genuinely curious. No big deal if you don't want to answer or don't know the answer.

 

[Hay Man]

I'm generally curious to know who knows someone who was healthy and unvaxed who died from covid. I personally know two people who know someone young that died. I don't know if they were vaxed tho. I feel like one of them died before the vaccine even came out but I can't remember for sure.

One was un-vaxed and 51 years old. Very active outdoorsman and died about a year into it, nothing else wrong with him. Another was an older neighbor of mine - mid 70's - but had nothing else wrong with him, un-vaxed. The others I knew, I couldn't tell you if they were vaxed or not. All around a year or so into covid.

 

[PCHawk]

One was un-vaxed and 51 years old. Very active outdoorsman and died about a year into it, nothing else wrong with him. Another was an older neighbor of mine - mid 70's - but had nothing else wrong with him, un-vaxed. The others I knew, I couldn't tell you if they were vaxed or not. All around a year or so into covid.

Thanks. 51 is so young to die like that. So unlucky. I wonder what makes someone die when the odds are so small. Viral load maybe. Or just random bad reaction to it.

 

[CP87]

When these paramilitary groups start taking matters into their own hands, don't act like there were no warning signs.

Far-Right Militias Seek Role in Trump Deportation Plan https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/11/...-border-trump.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

Erik Prince among group that proposed plan for mass deportation effort, Politico reports

The website cited a 26-page plan suggested to Trump advisers by a group that included Prince, who is a Michigan native and Betsy DeVos' brother

www.freep.com

 

[Hay Man]

Thanks. 51 is so young to die like that. So unlucky. I wonder what makes someone die when the odds are so small. Viral load maybe. Or just random bad reaction to it.

Hard to say other than everybody reacts differently to certain things, whether it's medicines, vaccines or peanuts. Some things are just a mystery.

 

[Glass1/2fullguy]

No one should've been forced to take the vaccine. And before the flaming starts, I voluntary took both courses of it the first time it came out. I've had covid twice and both were after the vaccine. I have no regrets about taking the vaccine, either.

The covid thing just gets used as a political weapon by the left and right so they have something to argue about like you guys are doing now.

If you were afraid of getting sick, stay home. Almost every person killed by covid was overweight and had preexisting comorbidities. Basically, if you chose for your entire life up to that point to eat Big Macs and soda, smoke, or didn't keep yourself relatively fit by at least walking a little everyday you were at risk. Those choices aren't everyone else in society's fault. There were some healthy folks who died of covid, but there are with literally every respiratory virus.

It wasn't worth (and still isn't) bringing society to a halt. Kids needed to be in school. People need to be able to walk up to others and talk to them with their faces showing if they both choose to. Humans need social activities like sporting events and computer club and to be able to go hang out with friends. Have any of you seen one of the myriad studies showing what happens to people's permanent mental health when they're totally isolated from other human beings?

It's a personal responsibility thing. You use data (not emotion) to decide what the risks are, and then you take the risks you are comfortable with. If you decide it's too risky to go out in public you stay home, with the added benefit that if you do that then you don't have to worry about someone without a mask infecting you.

Every single respiratory pandemic in history has shown us that it works its way through society and no matter what precautions are taken it can't be stopped. And then it eventually becomes just another cold virus. Like the Spanish Flu did, and like covid 19 did. The data also showed that if you are even remotely fit and healthy you have almost zero risk of dying. Those two points right there made me not worry even a little about it other than the harm we were doing with mythical "social distancing." I shouldn't be prevented from going to work or Walmart because someone else lived off of bacon, Mountain Dew, and cigarettes their whole lives and never took a walk.

This. This. And THIS. My opinion was the same 4 months into the pandemic as it is today. For the most part mirrors yours. I don't even get how anyone can have a different opinion especially today. I'd be curious to know the percentage of people who were obese and scared during the pandemic actually changed their lifestyle because of it. I'd be willing to bet the percentage is small.

 

[PCHawk]

Erik Prince among group that proposed plan for mass deportation effort, Politico reports

The website cited a 26-page plan suggested to Trump advisers by a group that included Prince, who is a Michigan native and Betsy DeVos' brother

www.freep.com

I guess that's good news for people who fear mass deportation. The article said the government has no interest in that plan and there's no evidence that shows Trump is even deporting people at a higher rate than Biden did.

 

[Westernhawk]

Just out of curiosity, was it incredibly impressive how fast Trump got the vaccine out? Or did it have nothing to do with him because he's the president of the United States, not some vaccine researcher? Here's a him. If you think Trump could have affected covid spread as the president, you should definitely be extremely impressed with his vaccine work.

I was impressed with how fast he worked with stakeholders to get the vaccine out to people. I was very briefly encouraged by this.

Then, he seemed to embrace the "anti vax" crowd and then ultimately hired RFK in this administration, which seems to move us in the wrong direction, IMHO. I think Trump is very skilled and weighing how his actions are perceived, which is somewhat different than always trying to do the right thing. I give him credit, he's good at that.

 

[Westernhawk]

It's sad that the press let it get that bad. They get what they deserve tho.

Wow you sure have authoritarian leanings. You think the government should control the free press, and you said yesterday, I believe, that Russia "made more sense" than Western Europe.

Wow. Just, wow.

I'm a big fan of the constitution.

 

[PCHawk]

Wow you sure have authoritarian leanings. You think the government should control the free press, and you said yesterday, I believe, that Russia "made more sense" than Western Europe.

Wow. Just, wow.

I'm a big fan of the constitution.

I think press is already government controlled and giving the boot to the ones who are is a good thing.

If you're talking about my woke comment, I didn't give my own opinion there. I said "some people". Although I guess I do agree more with Russia on that one aspect. I think it's ok to like one single thing about a country more than another country (in this case continent) while still liking the other country (continent) better.

 

[Westernhawk]

I think press is already government controlled and giving the boot to the ones who are is a good thing.

If you're talking about my woke comment, I didn't give my own opinion there. I said "some people". Although I guess I do agree more with Russia on that one aspect. I think it's ok to like one single thing about a country more than another country (in this case continent) while still liking the other country (continent) better.

Kicking out reporters who you don't like is definitely government control of the press. I believe only Trump does this. Happy to be corrected if that's not the case.

Can you give me examples of "government controlled press" that are different from this, that have perhaps been done by the Dems? Just curious if you have any examples, or if it's just a feeling.

 

[PCHawk]

So these tax cuts that are "only for billionaires" includes no tax on tips. No tax on social security, and no tax on overtime. Man Trump sucks and keeping the promises of what the media says he will do.

 

[PCHawk]

Kicking out reporters who you don't like is definitely government control of the press. I believe only Trump does this. Happy to be corrected if that's not the case.

Can you give me examples of "government controlled press" that are different from this, that have perhaps been done by the Dems? Just curious if you have any examples, or if it's just a feeling.

Correct. If you are kicking them out because you don't like them, that's wrong. But if you are kicking them out because they're bought and paid for, them that's good. Considering some news outlets were getting paid by USAID, I'd say that's proof that they're bought and paid for.

Reuters, AP, BBC, and Politico: How much US government funding did they receive? | World News - The Times of India

US News: Explore the significant US government funding received by major media organizations like Reuters, Associated Press, New York Times, and BBC, and the implications on media independence and press freedom.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

 

[PCHawk]

Holy shit 100 pages of this tread!

 

[Westernhawk]

If you're sick of people regurgitating shit, you gotta look in the mirror man. You are equally as bad if not worse. You're definitely worse in the sense of how sure of your side you are. You're also worse in your hate towards the other side. You gotta be all sorts of brainwashed to say the things you say and think the things you thing, then call someone else brainwashed.

Also I'm a firm believer on overall, both parties are equally bad. But what democrats have done to democracy has completely changed our country. From provable things like pushing Hilary through over Sanders, pushing Biden out in the 11th hour, and legally going after a political opponent, to unproveable things like stealing an election and doing a false flag on our capitol. Iran seriously, how many more elections before they let democrats choose their candidate?

I'm on the side of the constitution. You are not.

You think everything is a team sport. It is not. Some things are just wrong, and dude, you're gonna be on the wrong side of history.

I am not a democrat. I'm independent and vote as such. I loathe everything Trump stands for, however, so it is fair to say that I'm virulently anti-Trump, because he wants to remake democracy in his image. Feel free to ignore me. This seems to be your hobby.

Truth be told, I sometimes reply to you, usually using some data or evidence to support my position. However, you're not my audience. I'm posting for other, more reasonable people on the board. My actual goal is to point out the many, many things that the new administration is doing that is corrupt, wrong, stupid, and frankly, evil.

If you don't like it you can reply to others, play your little "red team" game, and move on. Feel free to ignore me. You don't traffic in facts, anyway. You're a pure conspiracy theorist who frankly doesn't know much outside of what you read on X. If you ONCE posted anything with any kind of evidence, you'd be at least a little bit credible. You're not credible. You're a MAGA troll.

I don't need to expand on what I do professionally, but I'm used to talking with highly educated, thoughtful people on a daily basis. And you're talking shit about "stealing an election." You are revealing yourself to be a rabid conspiracy theorist who loathes science and reason. False Flag? GTFO. People like you are dangerous bootlickers.

 

[Gibsonian]

I'm on the side of the constitution. You are not.

You think everything is a team sport. It is not. Some things are just wrong, and dude, you're gonna be on the wrong side of history.

I am not a democrat. I'm independent and vote as such. I loathe everything Trump stands for, however, so it is fair to say that I'm virulently anti-Trump, because he wants to remake democracy in his image. Feel free to ignore me. This seems to be your hobby.

Truth be told, I sometimes reply to you, usually using some data or evidence to support my position. However, you're not my audience. I'm posting for other, more reasonable people on the board. My actual goal is to point out the many, many things that the new administration is doing that is corrupt, wrong, stupid, and frankly, evil.

If you don't like it you can reply to others, play your little "red team" game, and move on. Feel free to ignore me. You don't traffic in facts, anyway. You're a pure conspiracy theorist who frankly doesn't know much outside of what you read on X. If you ONCE posted anything with any kind of evidence, you'd be at least a little bit credible. You're not credible. You're a MAGA troll.

I don't need to expand on what I do professionally, but I'm used to talking with highly educated, thoughtful people on a daily basis. And you're talking shit about "stealing an election." You are revealing yourself to be a rabid conspiracy theorist who loathes science and reason. False Flag? GTFO. People like you are dangerous bootlickers.

Democracy in anyone's image is not a democracy. An entire branch of government abdicating it's responsibilities is a breach of the oath taken by those in that branch, I'm speaking you you Congress. There is no oversight of what is going on today. Giving these rights to the Executive Branch is not congruent with the clear words in the Constitution:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .

And on establishing laws

The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The people should be upset with what is going on. It's entirely un Constitutional.

 

[PCHawk]

I'm on the side of the constitution. You are not.

You think everything is a team sport. It is not. Some things are just wrong, and dude, you're gonna be on the wrong side of history.

I am not a democrat. I'm independent and vote as such. I loathe everything Trump stands for, however, so it is fair to say that I'm virulently anti-Trump, because he wants to remake democracy in his image. Feel free to ignore me. This seems to be your hobby.

Truth be told, I sometimes reply to you, usually using some data or evidence to support my position. However, you're not my audience. I'm posting for other, more reasonable people on the board. My actual goal is to point out the many, many things that the new administration is doing that is corrupt, wrong, stupid, and frankly, evil.

If you don't like it you can reply to others, play your little "red team" game, and move on. Feel free to ignore me. You don't traffic in facts, anyway. You're a pure conspiracy theorist who frankly doesn't know much outside of what you read on X. If you ONCE posted anything with any kind of evidence, you'd be at least a little bit credible. You're not credible. You're a MAGA troll.

I don't need to expand on what I do professionally, but I'm used to talking with highly educated, thoughtful people on a daily basis. And you're talking shit about "stealing an election." You are revealing yourself to be a rabid conspiracy theorist who loathes science and reason. False Flag? GTFO. People like you are dangerous bootlickers.

I just posted evidence a couple posts ago. The crazy thing is conspiracy theory might very well change here over the next four years. If a bunch of corruption gets uncovered and becomes mainstream knowledge, you won't believe it, therefore you will be a conspiracy theorist. You can correct me if I'm wrong, but if Kennedy finds a bunch of corruption in health and shows the facts I assume you won't believe it? I assume you already don't believe the waste Musk has found? If a new investigation is done on Jan 6th that proves what is already known, I assume you won't believe that either right? The government will be telling you all of that tho. Not believing it will make you a conspiracy theorist. And when your answer is "well I won't believe THIS government! " my response will be "welcome to my world".

Also I'm not red at all. I'm anti government. That's why I'm liking what's going on right now. The whole "Republicans are good and democrats are bad" thing is ridiculous.

 

[PCHawk]

Democracy in anyone's image is not a democracy. An entire branch of government abdicating it's responsibilities is a breach of the oath taken by those in that branch, I'm speaking you you Congress. There is no oversight of what is going on today. Giving these rights to the Executive Branch is not congruent with the clear words in the Constitution:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . .

And on establishing laws

The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The people should be upset with what is going on. It's entirely un Constitutional.

Not letting democrats decide who their candidate is in two out of the last three elections is pretty unconstitutional. Changing laws to go after a political opponent is unconstitutional.