Well until you have more than an, "I think" or a, "probably" we probably don't have a lot of meaningful things to discuss.
I'm done, you win. It's a fucking cult.............
What about the example I gave of importing 386 million vehicle tires every year vs a maximum production capacity here of 11 million tires?
Here's a good read about the Musk Foundation and all that giving to humanity (himself):
www.alancantorconsulting.com
It's critical of Elon Musk, so it's automatically biased and invalid. Sorry.Here's a good read about the Musk Foundation and all that giving to humanity (himself):
The “Charity” of Elon Musk – Alan Cantor Consulting
There was no money in it until him. He could have picked a million things to do to get rich. He gravitates towards doing things that are good for humanity. And he talks about it a lot. If it was for the money, I think he could stop now. That said, of course you want to make money. But he sure as hell didn't pick lucrative companies to get involved in.
He got into all of his businesses to become rich. Sorry. Believe what you want.
Like your post about the agreements come to before with the Biden administration. Agreements were reached but the stuff isn't getting done. Then Trump has to use the tariffs to force them to actually do it. Fact is Canada wasn't doing what they agreed to. Facts are what is really going on. Terms that are not met and promises that are unfulfilled are not facts or reality. You want to say something as fact and claim victory on a message board but that isn't the whole story is it?
Sorry I can't tell you the exact date 3d printing will become that mainstream or an exact time it will take to make a pair of shoes. I didn't know they were relevant to the point I was making.
Reading this post made me legit laugh out loud considering you just got on me for posting "what I thought" after you provided data.
Musk must have done something right, since his personal net worth since the November election increased by $156 billion. Total USAID annual spending to provide food, medicine, shelter and other services to impoverished countries around the world: $38 billion.
This post is even worse than I originally thought. Musk is one of the smartest people alive and pretty much every business he's touched has turned to gold. The only way your post is relevant at all is if you think Musk was picking business opportunities based on odds of getting rich off them. It's pretty obvious Musk did just the opposite. He picks companies based on what interests him and then turns them into money makers. Your argument is dumb at worst and irrelevant at best.
Finally!
First of all, a tire and a shoe don't have equal value so why would time and cost to print each need to be equal? Second of all, again, my made up numbers had no relevance whatsoever to the point I was making. That point was to counter your narrow minded "never" speculation.
I'd like to know what percentage of that 156 billion is tesla shares. I'd also like to know what percentage of the 38 billion actually went to what it was supposed to go to. That's a question everyone should want to know. Not that our opinion matters here, but would you want to shut it down of say 37 of the 38 billion went to fatten pockets and only one billion went to what it was supposed to? What if 100% of it is getting wasted and it's all just a money laundering scheme? One thing I do know is a lot of politicians aren't liking that it's getting looked into.
This is a perfect example of how easy it is for the media to distort someone's opinion. There is always some half assed fact you can point to that if you just leave it at that. You will trick half of the people listening into believing something that isn't really true. They didn't even have to lie. Just preach about one fact over and over and purposefully leave the rest out. They didn't leave the part out where the countries weren't doing what they agreed to on accident. They knew the entire story and only told half to purposefully mislead the public. That's why Twitter is better than anywhere else. If I would have seen that on CNN, I might have walked away believing something that wasn't accurate. When I see the CNN clip on Twitter, I can read some comments and within 30 seconds of reading I know more to the story. It's much harder to get away with bullshit on Twitter. You can put bullshit on there (and there's a lot of it) but it gets called out in real time.
I'm sorry but this is funny too. When I give my opinion and start it with "I think" or "probably" that's not a bad thing. You give opinions and phrase them as facts. I think most people here would agree that that's a way worse way to communicate.
Ok, I guess? Lol. You want a reaction from me? I ain’t a cult worshipper of anyone let alone Muskovich so I don’t know what you expect me to say. You’re pretty offended over someone you’ve never met.
The point was you’re defending your argument with, “I don’t have to give your position any credence because I’m hoping there will be some kind of technological advancement in ten years that will prove you wrong.” Kinda weak of you ask me, but then again you didn’t ask me so what do I know. You sure get awfully mad about all this. That’s usually a sign of being frazzled in my experience.
