This year's tournament = fabulous!

FreddyBrown

Moderator
I'm an admitted college basketball junkie. For many years I have done my best to be able to take the first two days of the tournament off. I have DirecTV and the March Madness package and I watch as much of as many games as I can. I love it even in an average year.

This year, for me, was probably the most enjoyable NCAA tournament in memory that did not involve Iowa. It had:

--A reasonable number of early-round upsets

--Two great wins by UNI, for whom I was rooting

--Early round losses by Kansas and Syracuse, both of whom I was rooting against (as I would in most years)

--An Elite Eight loss by Kentucky, which completed the trifecta of highly-seeded teams I wanted to see go down

--Lots of good games, such as the double-OT Xavier-K State game called so memorably by Gus Johnson (I wanted for K State to lose, but Butler took care of them the next round anyway)

--An extended "Cinderella story" in Butler (although I've now had enough of them in the so-called Cinderella role; they have two or three potential NBA players on their roster and one who could be an NBA All-Star someday)

--A great run to the championship by Duke, from which I hold a degree and for whom I always root unless they're playing Iowa (which, unfortunately, has been the case in a couple of past NCAA tournaments)

--A nice run by Tennessee, which was one of my three "root-for" teams along with Duke and UNI. Tennessee's loss to MSU was one of the few disappointing outcomes of the whole tournament for me.

All in all, the tournament was just one long, great event, and it would still have been a great event for me if Hayward's shot had gone in.

Two things on the slightly negative side for future reference: One is that as noted above I've had enough of the Butler underdog/Cinderella story line for a good long while. They may even end up on my root-against list next season just to avoid having to hear it all over again.

The other is that between his public criticism of Iowa for firing a failed head coach and the fact that I'm bored with Michigan State in the Final Four now, I've also had enough of Izzo and hope that we can turn the tables on Sparty sometime in the not too distant future. I generally root for all the Big Ten teams in an NCAA tournament with the exception of Illannoy, and I think MSU may be joining Illannoy on the "not so much" list in the future.

After a great tournament like that, I can't wait for the next one--and more importantly for the next "official" one that includes Iowa. I hate that they're probably going to mess with perfection by expanding to 96 teams--not only because of the dilution, but because I don't think I can regularly swing more than two days off in that week of March!
 
Last edited:
By the way, I left out one of the true highlights of this year's tournament! Washington's thorough a$$-whipping of a certain "basketball school" from the Southwest!!!

:)
 
I agree that it was the best tourny in a few years. Many close games from the first day on, with quite few upsets...that works.

For the oppo view, I am listening to Boers and Bernstein on the Score,and they hated the game last nite, disliked the tourny overall, and basically have admitted that they no longer really like college bb. Berstein worked PR for the NBDA back in the day,so he is just a pro bb fan and even tho he is a Duke grad, has come to dislike the college game because it is so devoid of nba talent,and full of yahoo fans.
Boers used to cover college bb,grew to hate the coaches,especially Knight and also is down on the college game due to lack of Nba talent. And then when the NBA prospects lost, it made last nites game of little interest.

Easy to see why they said the other day why they would throw a party if SA fell off a cliff and died.......nice guys.
 
I've never listened to them but from what I've read, there isn't much those two guys do like, is there?

I'd be happy to see the NCAA and NBA get rid of the one year rule and let players go straight to the league out of HS. I'd like to see them require a kid who enters college to wait two or three years before he can go to the NBA, but even without that, let's be done with the "one and done" guys. I don't think they add much to the college game. I'd take a game like last night, filled with guys who are going to play three or in most cases all four years, any time.
 
Agreed, Freddy, but I gotta ask -- "fabulous"?

I suppose you also drink white wine, listen to Bette Midler music and own "The Wizard of Oz" (on beta, VHS and DVD, no less.)

C'mon, dude, man-up!
 
I can't remember a tournament where so many games came down to the last posession, or so many games that went back and forth from beginning to end. Truly one of the favorite tournaments to watch in my lifetime.
 
This year's tourney was entertaining, but I thought the previous two were kinda of duds with notable exception of maybe a handful of games. The grab and hold, grind it out basketball that college basketball has become is not that appealing to me. It reminds me of the NBA of the late eighties, early nineties where you had teams like Detroit(10% of NCAA Div. I teams) who played that way, but were watchable because they had several skilled players. And then there were teams like Miami/Knicks(90% of the other NCAA Div.I teams) who played that way just because that was the only way they could win.
 
Great stuff Freddy...I wish Butler had won last night, but holy crap was I getting tired of "Hoosiers" and "David vs Goliath" references...

Great tourney...right up til the "new and improved" One Shining Moment...
 
I wanted Butler to win last night strictly due to my Coach K hatred. But I thought it was a great tournament over all even without a rooting interest in one single team. I thought the Big 10 performed well as a whole. I have no problem with Izzo and the Spartans, he is a great coach plain and simple.
I also would like to comment on the slow grind out game that college basketball has become. It is disappointing to me to see the game like that. I caught part of an ESPN 30/30 production over the weekend on the Hank Gathers, Loyola Maramount University run after his death. I believe it was 1990 or 91, something like that, but they played Michigan, Alabama and UNLV in the dance, they scored over 100 pts in each game and 149 in their win over Michigan. They also scored over 100 in their loss to eventual champ UNLV. I was only 10 when this occurred and do not remember it but watching highlights took me back to time when college basketball was more entertaining. This team averaged 100 pts a game for the entire season, now a high scoring team scores 75 pts a game. Teams need to get back to the run and gun style game. I can't wait to FMAC take the Hawks back to that style of game. Hopefully it is a great run.
 
The adage about the Big Ten is that it is a physical league, and I think that is true. Now, a big part of that is because the refs let them play physical without fouls. The tourny was reffed the same way,with a lot of bumping and even handchecking allowed. So, it should be an advantage to the Big Ten in the tourny and it was.
So, is the Big Ten Way taking over around the country?
Also, how does Fran's style work with Big Ten refs?
The NBA severely cutback on handchecking about 4-5 years ago and scoring has been up ever since. I think college reffing might need a tweaking also...but of course it is harder with amatuer refs.
 
Top