NorthKCHawk
Well-Known Member
The most likely starting line-up would be one of the most experienced teams in terms of starts in the conference.
JT: Nearly one full season as the starting PG and a year as the backup. Junior
JBO: Most starts since the Bible starting tracking such things. Red Shirt Doctoral Candidate.
CMAC: Two year starter. 4th year in the program
Keegan: A handful of starts last season and played starters minutes a good deal of time last season.
FR: Two year starter in the Summit, which is not a terrible second tier conference. 4th year playing D1 college ball.
That is a lot of collegiate starting experience. And, our most talented player is the least experienced and has the most upside.
Like many, I think the better starting line-up substitutes the younger McCaffrey into the line-up and uses Conner as the experienced 6th man who can play 4 positions. What a luxury off the bench.
You could talk me into getting excited about this starting 5, with some developing raw talent coming off the bench.
JT: Nearly one full season as the starting PG and a year as the backup. Junior
JBO: Most starts since the Bible starting tracking such things. Red Shirt Doctoral Candidate.
CMAC: Two year starter. 4th year in the program
Keegan: A handful of starts last season and played starters minutes a good deal of time last season.
FR: Two year starter in the Summit, which is not a terrible second tier conference. 4th year playing D1 college ball.
That is a lot of collegiate starting experience. And, our most talented player is the least experienced and has the most upside.
Like many, I think the better starting line-up substitutes the younger McCaffrey into the line-up and uses Conner as the experienced 6th man who can play 4 positions. What a luxury off the bench.
You could talk me into getting excited about this starting 5, with some developing raw talent coming off the bench.