tweeterhawk
Well-Known Member
This part made me chuckle ...
Athletics administrators have not made public the amount they expect to pay for an outside agency’s fan and ticketing work, and bids are due back April 12. The intent, though, is to award a two-year contract, with an option for three one-year extensions, with a pricing model based on revenue sharing and emphasizing new business.
Does this guy know no other way to do business? Classic Gar-Bar ... Clandestine verbals leading to lopsided, front-loaded guarantees and low-bar bonuses. Might as well sign 'em up for the 5 years, right now. Worry about the performance and RoI, later.
As lightning1 pointed out ... listening to a fan base that's been willingly offering reasonable solutions for years is frickin' FREE! Cripes for the cost of a few lunches and donuts, have a series of roundtables with the intent of actual implementation and you'd have just as effective results at a fraction of the cost that GarBar is certain to commit to.
Gary seems to be forgetting to tell us a lot these days — Fran’s extension, how much this is going to cost .... Is he suffering from amnesia?