Thawki
Well-Known Member
Or should I say "posers" here.
It has been fairly entertaining to see how some posters on this board posing as expert scouts had written Woodbury off as a big guy that was not high D1 caliber because of his star ratings or their own personal judgements of his game before he ever got out of his junior year of high school. Some were convinced he would be nothing because he didn't dominate every minute of every game in his junior year in Iowa, which is not Chicago or NYC.
Now that Roy, Self and others are coming to call and he seems to be making a name for himself on the summer circuit, I would be interested to hear from the naysayers now about what they think of him. Or maybe to put it better, I think they should come back and admit how prematurely judgmental they were about a player's game that wasn't even out of his junior year yet in high school.
It appears he is going to be pretty darn good and a top 50 type talent if not better. Maybe some had better just keep to being fans and let our coaches do the scouting.
It has been fairly entertaining to see how some posters on this board posing as expert scouts had written Woodbury off as a big guy that was not high D1 caliber because of his star ratings or their own personal judgements of his game before he ever got out of his junior year of high school. Some were convinced he would be nothing because he didn't dominate every minute of every game in his junior year in Iowa, which is not Chicago or NYC.
Now that Roy, Self and others are coming to call and he seems to be making a name for himself on the summer circuit, I would be interested to hear from the naysayers now about what they think of him. Or maybe to put it better, I think they should come back and admit how prematurely judgmental they were about a player's game that wasn't even out of his junior year yet in high school.
It appears he is going to be pretty darn good and a top 50 type talent if not better. Maybe some had better just keep to being fans and let our coaches do the scouting.