GodGodGodBathia
Well-Known Member
If you can play, you should be able to play. It's probably the most idiotic thing ever to have to go to college before the NBA. You're allowed to have a different opinion, but if you do you're a m-o-r-o-n.
If you can play, you should be able to play. It's probably the most idiotic thing ever to have to go to college before the NBA. You're allowed to have a different opinion, but if you do you're a m-o-r-o-n.
If you can play, you should be able to play. It's probably the most idiotic thing ever to have to go to college before the NBA. You're allowed to have a different opinion, but if you do you're a m-o-r-o-n.
You don't have to go to college, you just have to be at least a year removed from high school. After all the kids who flamed out, the owners made a wise decision to require everyone to get an extra year of experience so the owners didn't have to risk looking like idiots thinking every high schooler is the next LeBron or Kobe and get stuck with a bust.
Not to mention it's killing college basketball. You don't see the "face of the program" type players very often anymore: the Tyler Hansboroughs, the Christian Laettners, the Danny Mannings. Seriously, how many have there been recently? Hansborough, Reddick, Greivas Vasquez, Adam Morrison, Sherron Collins.....then who?
Now, it's the "face of the year" guys: Derrick Rose, Kevin Love, Tyreke Evans, John Wall, Greg Oden, O.J. Mayo, Kevin Durant, the list could go on. It's just "Rent a Championship". I like seeing a guy like Hansborough win a title much more than seeing Wall.
So just let the kids who can play out of high school go to the NBA. The NFL is the only league that should have an age limit, as VERY few 18 year olds can play in the NFL. But the NBA? That list of guys above? They were all ready for the NBA at 18, for the same reason they were all ready at 19. What's the real difference?
The NFL doesn't have an age limit, they have a requirement that you have to be 3 years removed from high school.
The rule benefits the NBA for another reason. When a player comes from college and goes to the NBA, that player already has a built-in fan base (fans of his college team) that are likely to be interested in his performance in the NBA. This is likely to result in some of those fans paying attention to his career, possibly by watching NBA games or attending NBA games that they otherwise would not have watched or attended. This benefits the NBA by generating additional interest (and dollars) from people who may not otherwise have any interest in the NBA.
The overall lack of college experience (0, 1, or 2 years vs. 4 or 5 years of yester-year) of NBA players, and the corresponding loss of the built-in fanbase, may account for some of the loss of interest in the NBA of basketball fans who were much more dedicated NBA fans 15-20 years ago. Adding even just one year of college for NBA players may help shore this up. Just a theory.
I think you bring up many good points. I just don't like the rule.
I personally think you should be able to go pro in any sport right out of high school, including the NFL. I realize that 18 year olds are physically dominated in the NFL, but who cares. It is on the owners and front office to make the decisions. If they don't want to take that chance, they don't have to.
The whole "go to college for one year" thing is stupid, and is ruining college bball! It makes it more likely that these losers like calipari can just pay players to come play for him for one year. When you are 18 you can do everything in the world except drink and enter the NFL/NBA drafts. I don't get it!
NCAA should go back to the rule where freshmen are not eligible until NBA changes the idiotic one and done rule.
But any kid with a brain stem knows that going to college for a year is a better option than going overseas.