Both players are amazing and fun to watch with a ton of talent. While I think Obi definitely benefitted from weaker competition, but I don't by any means think that makes his game inferior to Luka's or makes the argument that Luka is a better player because he played against better competition. Both are hands down two of the best players in the country and rightfully so.
Do I think Luka was more deserving? Or should have got the award? Possibly. That said, Obi's a phenomenal player and I think Luka would agree to that. I guess my point is that whether Obi was or wasn't more deserving is more about the voters then the players themselves. I don't consider Obi any less of a player because he was voted (in this instance) the better player. I don't see Dayton fans as having any bragging rights, and I don't see us having any reason to bitch. Both are great players. One will go on to be one of the top picks in this years draft and the other will hopefully win the award next year, but both had incredible seasons.
That said, hopefully those same Dayton fans throwing shade enjoyed their time in the spotlight, because their time in the spotlight is over.