Some positives and negatives so far

nickhawk

Well-Known Member
Two games in and I have seen some signs of encouragement from this team:

• The offense is running about 20 more plays a game than what was averaged last year
• Rudock has shown good mobility and can make a play with his feet
• Weisman is a tank that can get some tough yards and can handle 20 plus carries a game
• The linebacker play has been really good – particulary Hitchens
• Blitzing the QB is happening more often and with positive results

Despite the positives so far, it is not hard to identify the major weaknesses of this team:

• No pass rush whatsoever from the front 4
• Secondary is getting beat deep badly on a frequent basis
• Inability to sustain drives
• Receiver play has been very poor with multiple drops and continued problems getting separation
• Penalties and special teams play have been big concerns

Breaking it down further, my major frustrations are concentrated in 2 areas:

Play-calling:

• In the Northern Illinois game - 3 times the Hawks faced a 3rd and less than 3 and all three times the call was for a pass that fell incomplete and resulted in a punt. If Weisman is our best player and the O-Line is considered a strong point, then pound the ball, pick up crucial first downs and keep drives alive.
• The bubble screen has not worked since McNutt left, so stop calling a play that doesn’t work.
• Stop throwing dangerous out patterns that require the QB to throw the ball 10-20 yards to only pick up 4-8 total yards – this pass is the easiest for a DB to read as well as intercept, and yet it remains a staple in the Greg Davis inept playbook.

Personnel decisions:

• Powell needs to be utilized more – if the kid is only on the field for 3 plays a game it is pretty easy for the opposing team to key on him when he is on the field – none of the other receivers can create any separation, so this kid needs to be on the field a lot more to at least keep the safeties from playing in the box the whole game.
• Shumpert is stonehands from the movie Necessary Roughness – don’t throw the ball to stonehands – I don’t know how this guy continues to start and get the majority of playing time when he consistently drops more passes than he catches.
• CJ Fed is a weapon that needs to be targeted at least 6 times a game. Jon Miller has commented multiple times about being dumbfounded that he is not being targeted more often. The touchdown he caught in the opener is a perfect example of how to use this guy – put him in the middle of the field and let him box out or out jump his defender for the ball.
• I still think that Canzeri is most explosive option at running back that we have, and he is being vastly under-utilized. I like Weisman a lot to wear down the defense and get the tough yards, but he just doesn’t have the speed to break long runs. I think that Canzeri is a much better change of pace back to Weisman’s style than Bullock, and I think that Canzeri has more burst and more ability to make a defender miss in the open field. The coaches could use Canzeri as a screen option and as a 3rd down back very effectively if he is given the chance to make some plays. Ferentz tends to give running backs an entire series and then they are out – mix it up and use different RB’s based on the down and distance.
 


Love the first part of your post. Agree on most of the play calling thoughts(but at least we are throwing past the marker).

Also agree on the CJF targeting #.

Powell and Canzeri need to show more to play more.
 






• Stop throwing dangerous out patterns that require the QB to throw the ball 10-20 yards to only pick up 4-8 total yards – this pass is the easiest for a DB to read as well as intercept, and yet it remains a staple in the Greg Davis inept playbook.

It's worse than you think it is. That horrible game-ender against NIU was a throw that, if completed, would have gained us approximately 8-10 yards. Based on the drop of the QB and the fact we were on the far hash, Rudock had to put that ball in the air close to 40 yards to get 8-10.

I hate that throw too, and probably have posted too often about it. We run a lot of those wide side hitches/outs, even going back to the KOK days. In theory it makes sense, because without checking I'd imagine we see a lot of 8 man boxes with cover 3 principles behind it, which means that corner is going to be very soft. But that is a long throw for any QB and the reward is often minimal.
 


It's worse than you think it is. That horrible game-ender against NIU was a throw that, if completed, would have gained us approximately 8-10 yards. Based on the drop of the QB and the fact we were on the far hash, Rudock had to put that ball in the air close to 40 yards to get 8-10.

Ok, let me get this straight. If he completes the pass we gain 8-10 yards, but if he throws a pass that the cornerback is expecting as he was; the worst case scenario is a pick six. Am I correct? If I am, it seems like the highest probable gain is 10 yards while the worst negative gain is a pick six. Sounds like G. Davis needs to understand the risk/reward percentage ratio. Did they not teach probabilities when he was in school?
 


Ok, let me get this straight. If he completes the pass we gain 8-10 yards, but if he throws a pass that the cornerback is expecting as he was; the worst case scenario is a pick six. Am I correct? If I am, it seems like the highest probable gain is 10 yards while the worst negative gain is a pick six. Sounds like G. Davis needs to understand the risk/reward percentage ratio. Did they not teach probabilities when he was in school?

Correct. Thus illustrating the reason I hate that throw in the first place. The throw could have been better, but so could have the call. #nohijack
 


Have read that the reason that Powell was not targeted last game was because he was double covered. That is great. If he is doubled then that leaves a Kittle or a CJF wide open. If they don't he can beat them. It has been said if he hadn't quit on his rout in the NIU game he had a TD. Both are great options. I agree he needs to play more than 3 plays/game, maybe not every play, but more than he has.
 


Have read that the reason that Powell was not targeted last game was because he was double covered. That is great. If he is doubled then that leaves a Kittle or a CJF wide open. If they don't he can beat them. It has been said if he hadn't quit on his rout in the NIU game he had a TD. Both are great options. I agree he needs to play more than 3 plays/game, maybe not every play, but more than he has.

There is no reason not to have him in the game. Heck, just have him run a fly pattern every play. That will take two defenders out of the play.
 


Freed is that really how you would develop a reciver who has been on campus about a month ? I want him out there bad but I am willing to wait until he learns the play book
There is no reason not to have him in the game. Heck, just have him run a fly pattern every play. That will take two defenders out of the play.
 


Freed is that really how you would develop a reciver who has been on campus about a month ? I want him out there bad but I am willing to wait until he learns the play book
Here is the situation. You are desperate for every win you can get this year. You don't leave your fastest man off the field just because he doesn't know the whole playbook. There has to be an urgency to do things that WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Who am I fooling, though? We all know there will be no urgency attached to a kf team.
 


I don't think Powell needs to be on the field the majority of the time to make a big difference. Even if he is involved in 10-15 plays instead of 2-5 it will make it a lot harder for the defense to key on him when he is on the field. If he is not constantly facing double teams or being keyed on, it will make it a lot easier to effectively use him on a reverse call or get him the ball on a quick slant and let him use his speed. I don't think he needs to have the entire playbook mastered for him to be on the field 10-15 plays each game.
 


I don't think Powell needs to be on the field the majority of the time to make a big difference. Even if he is involved in 10-15 plays instead of 2-5 it will make it a lot harder for the defense to key on him when he is on the field. If he is not constantly facing double teams or being keyed on, it will make it a lot easier to effectively use him on a reverse call or get him the ball on a quick slant and let him use his speed. I don't think he needs to have the entire playbook mastered for him to be on the field 10-15 plays each game.

You have to understand that this kinda thought process is completely foreign to kf.
 


Freed is that really how you would develop a reciver who has been on campus about a month ? I want him out there bad but I am willing to wait until he learns the play book

I hope he can handle that and school while staying eligible. This ain't Ole Miss after all.
 




Top