If he misses Minnesota, then PJ is truly sitting on a pile of lucky horseshoes this year.
I hope beyond hope that he is back for Wisconsin. Those d-backs will beat on Nico and ISM like a rented mule.
Minnesota has not played a conference team this year that has played with its starting QB.
Maryland would be the first if their QB holds on for the next few days.
Wow. Didn't realize that.
That contributes to those 5 conference foes (counting UMD) having 5 conference W's between them (16 L's).
After Maryland, the Goofs last 4 opponents currently have 9 conference W's (w/ NW contributing 0 to that)
And, is it really an advantage to miss Adrian Marturnoverez?In order to be fair, Purdue and Illinois did begin those games with their starting QBs. Nebraska & Rutgers didn't have them at all.
I can’t imagine our WR group is much worse than Illinois and they had their way with the Wisconsin secondary.If he misses Minnesota, then PJ is truly sitting on a pile of lucky horseshoes this year.
I hope beyond hope that he is back for Wisconsin. Those d-backs will beat on Nico and ISM like a rented mule.
I can’t imagine our WR group is much worse than Illinois and they had their way with the Wisconsin secondary.
I can’t imagine our WR group is much worse than Illinois and they had their way with the Wisconsin secondary.
I thought Illinois only completed 9 ot 21 passes that day for pedestrian yardage.Didn't it seem like Illinois RBs and WRs both made Wisconsin's secondary look bad? Illinois was even without arguably the top WR for the entire game and their skill guys made the Badgers DBs look slow.
They had like a 70 yard passing TD called back for some phantom penalty that had nothing to do with UW’s making a good play in the secondary. That would completely change your stats.I thought Illinois only completed 9 ot 21 passes that day for pedestrian yardage.
I thought Illinois only completed 9 ot 21 passes that day for pedestrian yardage.