I
ILHawk
Guest
I'm wondering why it took a 4 win season to get mad rather than 5 and 6 losses...... with all that NFL talent.
Further, in the context of what has transpired over the past year at Penn State and in view of the contemporaneous press reports involving an academic adviser in the athletics department, Ferentz should have been prepared for questions about it, even if just to say he couldn't comment. Shame on him, his staff and the sports information office for not anticipating it. The reporter was simply doing his job.
Why is this news? Who cares?
Why is this news? Who cares?
Agreed. And WHO is about to learn a very important lesson in the world of hick-town college athletics which is to self-censor what you report because if you don't, access goes bye bye. Illinois has been run like this for at least 20 years. Some national media company needs to hire kids like Tork for 1 year un/low paid internships and send them into various college towns to be the a-holes because the kids will rotate out every year. A grown man needs to exercise better judgment, but if you send the Torks of the world around to do stuff like this as post-grad experience, it would be fine.
Because news, more and more has become about a gotcha moment or entrapment. It is news if it is in the sports section of the newscast. It is not appropriate for the middle of the newscast, nor is the sportscasters editorializing appropriate.
But what do you expect from a newscaster in the 90th biggest market in the United States?
My opinion...
Lately Hassel seems to have an agenda when discussing Kirk. I know he grew up a Hawk fan and maybe he's just pizzed because of the lackluster play the last few seasons but if you listen to him when he fills in on Murph and Andy or on the sportscast he likes to take a lot of potshots at Kirk. This is no exception. I'm sure Chris was glad Kirk gave him a reason to put that up on the news. Furthermore, they didn't even wait until sports to show it, they did it in the middle of the news segment.
Oh man, that last line has me chuckling. The editorializing is ridiculous. It is a complete offshoot of ESPN having 24 hours of space to fill across at least 3 networks with only 6-8 hours of live actual sports coverage content to air daily. So you get 16 hours of editorializing crap every day and it has flowed over into all sports coverage because every clown out there thinks he is Michael Wilbon. The Trib used to have a decent sports section but now the freaking thing is half filled up with columns of Teddy Greenstein hyping a marginal Northwestern team or giving a reach around to Notre Dame.
The video that was aired showing Ferentz swearing.
The pressers were over and Kirk chose to talk to the reporter who asked the question he had an issue with
Do you feel like that is still fair game territory?
I have some opinions but will let others weigh in before sharing mine
Who cares whether Hassel has wood for Ferentz? Seems to me that's all part of the business: take shots at the popular, stir rage and controversy, produce ratings. Of anyone on this message board, JonDMiller probably understands that the best, even if he doesn't always subscribe to it.
Why is it pertinent to ask Ferentz this in the first place? Kirk probably didn't have anything to do with re-hiring him in the first place as it's not in his realm to do so. This was just an attempt to try and stir stuff up and get a reaction to have something to put on the news based on the fact that Kirk's team is really struggling and he might already be in a lousy mood. On that account, mission accomplished.