Sandusky Interview
- Thread starter rjhindm
- Start date
ssckelley
Well-Known Member
Can Sandusky? You mean can the prosecuting attorneys get a fair and impartial jury? It seems like everytime I turn around there is someone trying to cover this up.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. She was seventeen.
Section136
Well-Known Member
Im thinking he offs himself.
Billso
Well-Known Member
And the girl was his client.
I was struck by how in the Costas interview, the attorney stated emphatically he'd have no qualms about leaving his kids alone with Sandusky, and that he believes in Sandusky's innocence, not just that he can fight the charges.
Wonder if the mother of his kids agrees.
thejumper5
Well-Known Member
I think it can be asked from both sides, but I think the question needs to be answered, are there 12 competent adults alive in the state of PA that haven't formed an opinion one way or another about this case?
I guess if OJ and Michael Jackson had juries, Sandusky can too, but I'm curious as to how this works.
silvanthalas
Well-Known Member
After he, as her lawyer, got her emancipated when she was still 16... and they got married just a few months after said emancipation.
Wanna bet he was just as touchy with her at 16 as Sandusky was with little boys?
jesterapparel
Well-Known Member
I think they got married like 5 or 7 years after the emancipation in an article I read. Could be wrong, maybe that's when they got the divorce.
74Hunter
Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by ssckelley
Everything was "just horsing around", since when is it ever ok to be horsing around naked with 10 year old boys in the shower?
Think about this, he was caught for showering with a boy in 1998 and questioned by both his mother and the cops. So lets say that he simply "made a mistake" in that instance, you would make damn sure that you would NEVER, EVER put yourself in that position again. But he did, repeatedly.
It is so gross and I feel so dirty that I feel like taking a shower.......
.......well maybe not......
74Hunter
Well-Known Member
Agreed. A coward like him won't want to face justice.
ThunderHawk
Well-Known Member
Wow. I just caught that interview.
Holy self incrimination, batman!
Holy self incrimination, batman!
AHawk1
Well-Known Member
Thunder what the hell was the purpose of his attorney allowing him to do a interview?
ThunderHawk
Well-Known Member
God, I don't know. I guess they made the calculation that Sandusky was being so decimated in the media that he had to say something on his own behalf to at least muddy the waters.
But that creepy f'n interview is gonna get played in a courtroom, I guarantee it.
EddyP
Well-Known Member
Yet another reason why McCoward should have taken that kid out of there and went to the cops. I can just see the cross examination of McCoward, "So you saw what you thought was a child being raped and you just left him there? Why on Earth would you do that if that is truly what you saw? ANSWER THE QUESTION MR. McCOWARD!!!!"
imported_ankle23
Well-Known Member
it's not a secret that he's been involved with showering with boys in more than one case. a janitor caught him in a shower with a boy as well.
also noticed on a tv scroll that the grad assistant McQueary says he DID stop the shower incident when he stumbled on it back in 2002. i'm sure he's taking a lot of heat from all quarters.
ThunderHawk
Well-Known Member
I think McQueary is just covering his @$$, so to speak. Why didn't he tell the grand jury that? THAT would have been the first thing I told anyone about it.
Does. Not. Compute.
EddyP
Well-Known Member
I'm sure Sandusky stopped when he saw McQueary but my point is so what? You're right it doesn't make any sense. So he stops and then McCoward does what exactly? "Alright guys I'm outta here. Turn the lights off when you leave and lock up. Later."
silvanthalas
Well-Known Member
Sandusky all but incriminates himself. His lawyer has his own thing for little kids.
Joe Paterno, along with son Scott, look like complete boobs.
And you wonder if McQueary is going to manage to perjure himself if he sends out any more e-mails.
Joe Paterno, along with son Scott, look like complete boobs.
And you wonder if McQueary is going to manage to perjure himself if he sends out any more e-mails.
ssckelley
Well-Known Member
Does anyone know what to listen for in order to tell when someone is lying after you have asked them a question? Here is a sampling of the transcript, just reading it you can tell he is lying.
Costas: Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to under age boys?
Sandusky: Am I sexually attracted to underage boys?
(There was a nearly two-second pause)
Sandusky: Sexually attracted, no, I, I enjoy young people. I, I love to be around them. I, I, but no I’m not sexually attracted to young boys.
Costas: Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to under age boys?
Sandusky: Am I sexually attracted to underage boys?
(There was a nearly two-second pause)
Sandusky: Sexually attracted, no, I, I enjoy young people. I, I love to be around them. I, I, but no I’m not sexually attracted to young boys.
ssckelley
Well-Known Member
On the Dan Patrick show earlier today:
Costas said on part of the interview that was not aired, Sandusky claimed there were many boys who were helped by him and didn't object to his methods.
Horrifying!
Costas talks to Dan Patrick about Sandusky interview
Costas said on part of the interview that was not aired, Sandusky claimed there were many boys who were helped by him and didn't object to his methods.
Horrifying!
Costas talks to Dan Patrick about Sandusky interview
