Revisiting Mr. Davis vs Ferentz (and throw Hayden in there as well)

HaydenHawk56

Well-Known Member
Listening to the call in show made me want to look at the numbers again. Long-winded post, but I just think the Davis and Ferentz situations are different in looking at keeping or retaining that said coach.

Tom Davis 13 years
Iowa Hawkeyes (Big 10 Conference) (1986–1999)
1986-1987
Iowa
30-5
14-4
3rd
NCAA Elite 8
1987-1988
Iowa
24-10
12-6
3rd
NCAA Sweet 16
1988-1989
Iowa
23-10
10-8
4th
NCAA 2nd Round
1989-1990
Iowa
12-16
4-14
T-8th
1990-1991
Iowa
21-11
9-9
T-5th
NCAA 2nd Round
1991-1992
Iowa
19-11
10-8
5th
NCAA 2nd Round
1992-1993
Iowa
23-9
11-7
T-3rd
NCAA 2nd Round
1993-1994
Iowa
11-16
5-13
T-9th
1994-1995
Iowa
21-12
9-9
T-7th
NIT 3rd Round
1995-1996
Iowa
23-9
11-7
4th
NCAA 2nd Round
1996-1997
Iowa
22-10
12-6
T-2nd
NCAA 2nd Round
1997-1998
Iowa
20-11
9-7
T-5th
NIT 1st Round
1998-1999
Iowa
20-10
9-7
T-3rd
NCAA Sweet 16
Iowa:
269-140
125-105


Kirk Ferentz 14 years
1999
Iowa
1–10
0–8
11th
2000
Iowa
3–9
3–5
8th
2001
Iowa
7–5
4–4
T–4th
W Alamo
2002
Iowa
11–2
8–0
T–1st
L Orange[SUP]†[/SUP]
8
8
2003
Iowa
10–3
5–3
T–4th
W Outback
8
8
2004
Iowa
10–2
7–1
T–1st
W Capital One
8
8
2005
Iowa
7–6
5–3
T–3rd
L Outback
2006
Iowa
6–7
2–6
T–8th
L Alamo
2007
Iowa
6–6
4–4
T–5th
2008
Iowa
9–4
5–3
T–4th
W Outback
20
20
2009
Iowa
11–2
6–2
T–2nd
W Orange[SUP]†[/SUP]
7
7
2010
Iowa
8–5
4–4
T–4th
W Insight
2011
Iowa
7–6
4–4
4th (Legends)
L Insight
2012
Iowa
4–5
2–3
(Legends)
Iowa:
100–71
59–49

I was never for letting Mr. Davis go. Just wanted to look at these coaching comparisons again. Obviously Ferentz has a couple of Big Ten Titles, Mr. Davis technically never got one (the big reason Bowlsby let him go to do better). Ferentz clearly had more success in the past here.

But, Tom only had 2 losing seasons at Iowa. It appears Ferentz is headed for his fifth losing season (granted two of them were during the rebuilding years).

Let's put Hayden into the equation:
1979
Iowa
5–6
4–4
5th
1980
Iowa
4–7
4–4
4th
1981
Iowa
8–4
6–2
T–1st
L Rose
15
18
1982
Iowa
8–4
6–2
3rd
W Peach
1983
Iowa
9–3
7–2
3rd
L Gator
14
14
1984
Iowa
8–4–1
5–3–1
T–4th
W Freedom
15
16
1985
Iowa
10–2
7–1
1st
L Rose
9
10
1986
Iowa
9–3
5–3
T–3rd
W Holiday
15
16
1987
Iowa
10–3
6–2
T–2nd
W Holiday
16
16
1988
Iowa
6–4–3
4–1–3
T–3rd
L Peach
1989
Iowa
5–6
3–5
T–6th
1990
Iowa
8–4
6–2
T–1st
L Rose
16
18
1991
Iowa
10–1–1
7–1
2nd
T Holiday
10
10
1992
Iowa
5–7
4–4
5th
1993
Iowa
6–6
3–5
8th
L Alamo
1994
Iowa
5–5–1
3–4–1
7th
1995
Iowa
8–4
4–4
6th
W Sun
22
25
1996
Iowa
9–3
6–2
T–3rd
W Alamo
18
18
1997
Iowa
7–5
4–4
T–6th
L Sun
1998
Iowa
3–8
2–6
T–7th

Hayden 5 losing seasons in 19 years. 3 Big Ten Titles. 3 of those losing seasons were near the end of this coaching tenure at Iowa.


In looking at these 3 coaches, I'm trying to gauge "the health of the program" at the end of the Hayden and Davis years and the current health of the football program now under Ferentz. Both Fry and Ferentz averaged around 7 wins a year. That final Fry year was 4 games under the average. It is possible we could finish 2-3 games under the average this year for Ferentz.

Tom had this last team pretty much at the level he typically had his teams and made a sweet sixteen. He was still producing...... imho it was foolish to get rid of him. Even a few years later, he was able to make a doormat at Drake somewhat respectable.

Fry was slipping. He got out of the game.

Ferentz appears to be slipping similar to Fry. The question is, does Ferentz still have more millage left in him? Fry and Ferentz are looking very similar in years coached and how the later years have/are shaping up.

I believe by my math, Fry was 69 when he retired from Iowa. Ferentz still has 12 more years before he would reach that age and has that long contract lined up.

Hopefully it is just a real down year and he will have another run. The higher rated recruiting classes (like Jon has mentioned) will make a difference in the next couple of years. If not, we could be in a lot of trouble as a program.

Right now, I would say as a football program, we are about as bad, maybe will turn out to be a bit better than that 2000 team. But, it just makes me frustrated (don't get me wrong, I like what I'm seeing from Fran) how we can dismiss Mr. Davis who kept Iowa more or less at a consistent level, but lock up Ferentz for so long when his teams have been so up and down of late and what appears to be on a downward spiral. Barta put a lot of Ferentz stock into a BCS win over a non-traditional power in Georgia Tech (with an aging Defensive Coordinator and an Offensive Coordinator producing mixed results).

Also, I think comparing Davis to Ferentz to say be careful what you wish for because these situations are similar.....I'm not so sure they are to the extent of worrying about what happens if Ferentz leaves. At least at the end of the Davis Era at Iowa, he will still producing a respectable product. Ferentz is currently not.

The one thing to keep in mind though, over a five year span, with probably the exception of this year, Ferentz has had his team win at least 7 games a season. So, is this year just statistical noise, or is it the making of worse things to come?
 
Im tired of the Mr. Davis/Hayden/Ferentz comparisons.
Hayden Fry was a marketing genius. ANF? Awesome. Women as dumplings. Brilliant. Hayden knew his audience and catered to it. Plus he pulled us out of a 25 year losing streak. You cannot comare any coach to Fry.

Dr. Toms record is bouyed by that 30-5 season with Ravelings recruits. He never achsived anything like that. I will give you that Davis was a good coach, but a terrible recruiter. While Raveling was a great recruiter and a terrible coach. Combine the strengths of those 2 coaches and you have McCaffery.

Ferentz is what he is. He stabilized a program that had gotten stale. But now his program appears to have gotten stale.

But please dpont compare these coaches. Different situations, different coaches.
 
I only bring it up because it was being brought up again. I agree with you, different situations, different coaches. But, some are still afraid to part ways with Ferentz because they are afraid the football program will end up like the basketball program did when Davis got booted.
 
I was disappointed when they hired him, and I won't be disappointed when he decides to go. What we are getting at this point makes a change less and less "risky" all the time.
 
Mr. Davis was let go to take us to the next level. Ferentz needs out to keep us from being stuck in the basement.

Does anyone watch this team and get excited about the future?
 
The coaches are similar (at least Davis and KF) in that neither can recruit but both are great people and good teachers of their respective sports.

Both are admirable and have accomplished great things.

Neither can (or could have) take us to the promised land.
 
Ferentz is what he is. He stabilized a program that had gotten stale. But now his program appears to have gotten stale.

But please dpont compare these coaches. Different situations, different coaches.
Comparing coaches and their situations is never identical, but there is always something to learn.

Even above you compared Ferentz and Fry with this: "He stabilized a program that had gotten stale."

And I think you correctly compared the two.
 

Latest posts

Top