I still think the 2002 loss to ISU is painful only in hindsight because it stood between Iowa and a perfect season. But being that the loss was so early in the year it's hard to imagine that at the time, many felt it would be such a damaging loss. There is no way to predict, had Iowa won that game, what Iowa would have done going forward.
I know it did not get many votes, but I had to vote for the ASU loss.
I was at the game and I haven't felt that low too many times. The ASU fans were the most obnoxious, rude people I have ever encountered, and I still hate ASU to this day.
I voted for the 3 that inevitably "won"..
But, I also remember that game at Arizona (Regular, not State) being a tough very late night pill to swallow.. especially after they had worked you down the peaks and valleys of the roller coaster.. and we had the lead again..
No we didnt. PAT was blocked that would have given the Hawks the lead. Game ended 34-27.
I still think if that PAT goes through, the Hawks somehow get a stop and win that game.
If you are going to go by most painful at the time of the actual game, the 05'-06' loss by Iowa to ISU is probably more impactful. The Iowa team was coming off the miracle play to beat LSU the previous year, and was a top 10 team at the time. They were supposed to crush ISU in that game, and were instead pretty much decimated by turnovers in a lopsided contest. But because the whole season was such a disappointment, that game's impact is often softened by the overall dismal performance of Tate and that team as a whole. But at the time, all Hawk fans were on suicide watch.
I knew we were in trouble that Arizona game when ESPN was 10 mins late switching to it....by the time the game popped on the Hawks were already down what, 10?
I think you are probably right. Tate was often playing from behind and had to make plays with his arm to keep the Hawks going. The Hawkeyes fans and the media fell into the trap of expecting greatness because the program poster boys(QB, WR, RB) were accomplished and experienced, but the lunchpail guys were not.Once again, as I said yesterday in response to another Iowa State fan commenting about this, Tate's play in 2005 was the least of that Hawkeye's teams problems.
He put up better numbers in 2005 than he did the year before when he led the Hawks to a shared Big 10 Title. The lack of a formidable defensive line was the main reason the Hawks struggled that year. That was one of KOK's more productive offensive units, statistically speaking.
I still think the 2002 loss to ISU is painful only in hindsight because it stood between Iowa and a perfect season. But being that the loss was so early in the year it's hard to imagine that at the time, many felt it would be such a damaging loss. There is no way to predict, had Iowa won that game, what Iowa would have done going forward.
I knew we were in trouble that Arizona game when ESPN was 10 mins late switching to it....by the time the game popped on the Hawks were already down what, 10?
And another one I just thought of was 05 Michigan....I think that was the game that ended the "Streak" at Kinnick...overtime, phantom PI calls....I've never seen 70000 people so quiet as that day exiting Kinnick. It was like a funeral.
Supposedly the Arizona fans made the ASU fans seem like the welcome wagon.
That one just ****** me off. We were robbed in that one.