Research, please, Jon.

NorfolkNeb

Active Member
I think Iowa got about the best division slotting we could have hoped for.

I'm just curious Jon. Under coach KF, what has the Hawks total record been against Minnesota, Northwestern, Michigan, Michigan State & Nebraska (yes please include the two losses to the Huskers in the total won-loss).

Then, what is the KF record against Ohio State, Penn State, Wisconsin, Purdue, Illinois & Indiana?

Besides the won-loss record, could you also include the winning percentage, because there will clearly be a different number of total games played agisnt these two groups.

Wisconsin got the worst deal out of reshuffling. But at least they will get to play Indiana, Illinois & Minnesota every year (gimmes). From the Hawkeye's viewpoint we've almost always had a tougher time with NWN than Illinois (negative) and with MSU than Indiana (another negative). But, for the most part, playing Michigan & Nebraska every year gives us a better road to a title game than playing Ohio State and Penn State every year. Purdue as our "annual cross-division rival" is really kind of sweet. Four of the other five teams in "our" division certainaly have more difficult "cross-division" annaul games, and unless Sparty ever gets their act together, their "gimme" rivalry game with Indiana should not be a reason we miss a division championship. As KF says, "play the schedule you're given and you will probably get what you deserve when the year is over."
 


minn 8-3 .727
msu 5-4 .556
NW 4-5 .444
mich 3-4 .429
neb 0-2 .0000
total 20-18 .526

Wis 6-5 .545
PSU 7-2 .778
OSU 1-6 .143
Ind 5-4 .556
Pur 5-3 .625
Ill 5-3 .625
total 29-23 .558

We did get the crappy draw ;)
 


And while you are at it Jon don't forget his coffee either.

Seriously this stuff you want isn't that hard to get on your own, all you have to do is go back to 1999 and look up the results then calculate them.

Edit: nevermind someone already spent the 10 minutes it took to look it up.
 
Last edited:


That's kind of interesting decided to take it back to 93, which is what the big ten was using to set up the divisions.

Minn 13-4
NW 7-8
MSU 8-5
Mich 3-8
Neb 0-2
total 31-27 .534

Wis 8-7
Ind 8-7
PSU 8-5
OSU 1-10
Ill 8-6
Pur 7-4
total 40-39 .506
 


And while you are at it Jon don't forget his coffee either.

Seriously this stuff you want isn't that had to get on your own, all you have to do is go back to 1999 and look up the results then calculate them.

Edit: nevermind someone already spent the 10 minutes it took to look it up.

There's a website that does it for you. Stassen.com
 


There's a website that does it for you. Stassen.com

That's what I was trying to tell the OP and that he didn't need Jon to do it because Google is a wonderful thing. I didn't realize the winning %'s were calculated I guess. At any rate he didn't need Jon to hold his hand to do this is all I was getting at.
 
Last edited:




That's what I was trying to tell the OP and that he didn't need Jon to do it because Google is a wonderful thing. I didn't realize the winning %'s were calculated I guess. At any rate he didn't need Jon to hold his hand to do this is all I was getting at.

He's from nebreska I'm not sure they got Google yet.
 


And while you are at it Jon don't forget his coffee either.

Seriously this stuff you want isn't that hard to get on your own, all you have to do is go back to 1999 and look up the results then calculate them.

Edit: nevermind someone already spent the 10 minutes it took to look it up.

No shart... Look it up yourself their chief.. It took you longer to type that post than it would have to look it up and do it yourself.
 




No shart... Look it up yourself their chief.. It took you longer to type that post than it would have to look it up and do it yourself.

I was interested in the findings so why do I need to look it up? But thanks anyway. And how do you know how fast I can type?
 


I was interested in the findings so why do I need to look it up? But thanks anyway. And how do you know how fast I can type?

Ha sorry man but that wasn't aimed at you. Looking back I can see why you thought it was. I was actually agreeing with you when you mentioned to NorfolkNeb to look it up himself. sorry for the mixup
 




Top