beaverdaleguy
Well-Known Member
Logos: VERY disappointed. I shutter to think how much money was wasted with marketing firms and graphics designers to come up with bubble letters. I don't mind the B1G logo, but the other two are rediculous.
Division Names: Again, a big letdown for me. While it is nice to honor "legands and leaders" within the lengthy history of the conference, I felt anti-climactic and a sense of awkwardness as I think about highlights next season going from every other conference and their east-west, north-south, etc "normal" names to our post-modernistic ones. Too much fluff, not enough appeal for me.
Trophies: While I like the idea of the trophies and their selections for representatives to honor...18? Really? And some legandary names are paired with someone who simply won a big ten player of the year award or something. While great in itself, not the same level of legandary stature in my opinion. How many B10 POY winners can you name? Exactly.
Division Names: Again, a big letdown for me. While it is nice to honor "legands and leaders" within the lengthy history of the conference, I felt anti-climactic and a sense of awkwardness as I think about highlights next season going from every other conference and their east-west, north-south, etc "normal" names to our post-modernistic ones. Too much fluff, not enough appeal for me.
Trophies: While I like the idea of the trophies and their selections for representatives to honor...18? Really? And some legandary names are paired with someone who simply won a big ten player of the year award or something. While great in itself, not the same level of legandary stature in my opinion. How many B10 POY winners can you name? Exactly.