Eda
Well-Known Member
Thx, but facts aren't necessary here.
4 posts. Damn, I took the over.
Iowa has proven what it needs at rb...power with quickness and vision...think Greene, Russell, young, Hampton. That is what works best in our style.
As is listed above I hope Wadley can hang onto the ball because he shows some very good promise. I was surprised at his power between the tackles in his one shining game.
I would be OK with Canzeri or Daniels being number 1 if they can show the full package. Canzeri needs to show some power to go along with vision and quickness. Plus Canzeri when healthy can plant his foot and cutback.
Daniels has shown the ability to make one cut and I think he has decent power (not a lot of reps to get a good idea). If he is just a little faster than MWeisman that will help Daniels. I think Daniels needs to be ready to take on the straightahead power running and short yardage situations.
Let's not give up on Parker as someone who can run outside zone and maybe cutback ala Russell.
Iowa has proven what it needs at rb...power with quickness and vision...think Greene, Russell, young, Hampton. That is what works best in our style.
As is listed above I hope Wadley can hang onto the ball because he shows some very good promise. I was surprised at his power between the tackles in his one shining game.
I would be OK with Canzeri or Daniels being number 1 if they can show the full package. Canzeri needs to show some power to go along with vision and quickness. Plus Canzeri when healthy can plant his foot and cutback.
Daniels has shown the ability to make one cut and I think he has decent power (not a lot of reps to get a good idea). If he is just a little faster than MWeisman that will help Daniels. I think Daniels needs to be ready to take on the straightahead power running and short yardage situations.
Let's not give up on Parker as someone who can run outside zone and maybe cutback ala Russell.
I haven't given up on any of them...I am a huge Canzeri supporter I just don't think he can stay healthy as the feature back. Parker is smaller than Canzeri was when he got here so I am a little iffy on him as an rb. You compare him to Russell...russell was 200 lbs...Parker is 170 (iirc) huge difference. I like Daniels but he has bad vision and hasn't shown much in terms of cutbacks. He is manly just tried to out run to the outside. I think smith is the true unknown that could do a lot if he is as good as advertised.
MW is a 6th rated fullback out of 78 fullbacks; we get that. MW is a good fullback. But by definition, he isn't a tailback and; therefore, shouldn't have been used as the primary tailback for the past 2 seasons. Don't you agree?
I haven't given up on any of them...I am a huge Canzeri supporter I just don't think he can stay healthy as the feature back. Parker is smaller than Canzeri was when he got here so I am a little iffy on him as an rb. You compare him to Russell...russell was 200 lbs...Parker is 170 (iirc) huge difference. I like Daniels but he has bad vision and hasn't shown much in terms of cutbacks. He is manly just tried to out run to the outside. I think smith is the true unknown that could do a lot if he is as good as advertised.
Canzeri iss not going to be the guy. His vision is not all that good either, yes he put on weight, but looks slower as well. Not to mention he is constantly hurt. Parker, way too small. He,s about 170 tops, and he isn't going to be able to outrun everyone to the outside. Daniels, to me, is the guy. People say his vision isn't good, but he needs experience. not 1 carry here and there, but he needs to be on the field for a full game so he can get into the flow of the game. His build reminds me a lot of Shonn Greene. Wadley should also get plenty of carries, but isn't going to be able to take the pounding of an every down back.
So who beat him out for the position? Who was as consistent as he was?
Wadley can't hang on to the football..he is a fumble waiting to happen every time he carries the ball. I like his quicks could be effective in certain packages not running between tackles however. Wait! We don't run between tackles we call stretch's into the short side hoping the D doesn't know it's coming and our OL can't get there to reach block because the D knows where the ball is going before it's snapped.
So who beat him out for the position? Who was as consistent as he was?
Eda, just because kfootball decide to use a fullback as the primary tailback doesn't mean he was the best player. I will tell you that I saw signs last season that LD was good enough to be the primary tailback. You need to move beyond the fact that MW got most of the carries to call that "consistent. I could have gotten all of the carries and been "consistent." I would have been consistently bad, but I would have been consistent. kfootball understands that if a player doesn't play, their performance can't be evaluated by the fans. Just because no one else was the primary tb, doesn't mean there isn't a worthy player on the team. kfootball has made erroneous player personnel decisions and this is just one example.
You are clueless. More like who was given the opportunity to beat him out? No one. MW is one of KF's favorites, just like checkdown charlie is. In case you haven't noticed, captain clueless has a habit of not playing the most talented players, instead playing the 'feel good' story that no other team wanted because they lack talent. Now come back with the Bob Sanders and Dallas Clark story, that was 10 friggin years ago, and hasn't happened since. Yeah MW was definitely consistent, consistent at 2 yard runs, or turning would be td's for an actual rb into a 3 yard gain.
KirFer doesn't play other backs so you can't scout them out? Let me ask this... Do you take off the tinfoil hat when you sleep at night?
Ah yes... The age old argument that "Kurt don't play the bestest players". Take a look at the roster this year, and you'll find several spots where the incumbent/older player was unseated.
Please provide a list. I think you're wrong on this. In fact, I can't think of one incumbent starter from last season, who is still on the team or couldn't play due to an injury, was unseated.