SamBrownlee48
Well-Known Member
5 second shot clock. No dribbling. Would speed the game up tremendously.
What if bball were to adopt the penalty method used by ice hockey. Mainly if you commit a foul you go to the penalty box. If you are on defense and commit a reach in foul before the half court line you get 3 minutes minimum in the penalty box. If you foul the shooter you get two minutes and they get the free throws. I guess what I am saying is right now there is not enough of a penalty for fouls created by aggressive (same as physical) play. If you create a bigger disincentive for fouling it just might change the way coaches are teaching the game.
Can you imagine three players in the penalty box at one time? It could happen under such a system.
I would also add that big men do not know how to play with their back to the basket, it is a lost art. Too many big men think they are 3(s) and just want to hang out on the perimeter.
I'm in favor of a shorter shot clock. I don't see any reason why a team shouldn't be able to get a shot in 30 seconds. No reason to give a team an advantage by shortening the game by holding on to the ball.
EDIT: Iowa High School basketball needs to add a shot clock!!
What if bball were to adopt the penalty method used by ice hockey. Mainly if you commit a foul you go to the penalty box. If you are on defense and commit a reach in foul before the half court line you get 3 minutes minimum in the penalty box. If you foul the shooter you get two minutes and they get the free throws. I guess what I am saying is right now there is not enough of a penalty for fouls created by aggressive (same as physical) play. If you create a bigger disincentive for fouling it just might change the way coaches are teaching the game.
Can you imagine three players in the penalty box at one time? It could happen under such a system.
5 second shot clock. No dribbling. Would speed the game up tremendously.
Shaq was dominant in the NBA right up until his body started failing. Kareem, with his SkyHook, was unstoppable even in his late 30s. The reason Jordan scored a lot of his points is that he had an excellent post game. Today, aside from Tim Duncan, who actually has a good skill set with the back-to-basket game and demonstrates that night in and night out?