ShadasRevenge
Well-Known Member
Solid effort Friday. I thought you guys did a great job of delaying the inevitable that night. But anyways thanks for stopping by.
Your first troll job, although a poor effort, was much better than this.
Solid effort Friday. I thought you guys did a great job of delaying the inevitable that night. But anyways thanks for stopping by.
At this stage in their careers, Woody looks as good offensively as Brad Lohaus, and much better defensively. And Lohaus turned out pretty well.
Some more positives:
- Uthoff played well in a big game in a hostile environment.
- We nearly won with our best shooter (to date) going 0-7 and 4-17 (23%) from 3 as a team.
- Gesell looked comfortable as the 1 and was very aggressive.
- We are flat out the better team and have a higher ceiling for this year. This wouldve been a 5-7 point win on a neutral court. A couple of talking heads tweeted that they were more impressed with Iowa than ISU.
Lohaus was a McDonalds all American. Good place to start a project don't you think?Interesting comparison, Billso. One might say...condemnation.
Lohaus came in as a "project". Woody stepped on campus as highly-rated National recruit. So if Woody is no better...or just marginally better than Lohaus, one could say he's been a bit of a disappointment. As many are.
Lohaus was a McDonalds all American. Good place to start a project don't you think?
Some more positives:
- Uthoff played well in a big game in a hostile environment.
- We nearly won with our best shooter (to date) going 0-7 and 4-17 (23%) from 3 as a team.
- Gesell looked comfortable as the 1 and was very aggressive.
- We are flat out the better team and have a higher ceiling for this year. This wouldve been a 5-7 point win on a neutral court. A couple of talking heads tweeted that they were more impressed with Iowa than ISU.
Ha, this comment is always comical. Kansas needed a banked in 3 at the buzzer to win at home in OT over ISU. We then lost at home (even though it was a screwjob) and on a neutral court in the Big 12 tournament.
Ok, thinking more about the game, here are some positives from the ISU game:
1) Didn't allow ISU to go on a big run. I felt this was what would ultimately cause Iowa to lose, coming into the game. Instead Iowa stopped all the runs quickly with baskets of their own
2) Rebounded extremely well. Out rebounded them 49-35, and had 14 ORB to ISU's 6
3) Didn't let ISU guards kill them on the perimeter. I felt going into the game, that the ISU guards penetration ability would hurt Iowa. Iowa did a great job on Kane, Thomas, Morris, and Long on the perimeter. The only one who did anything at all was Long, and that was from deep (3-5) from 3pt range.
4) Out of bounds plays. How many easy baskets did Iowa get on out of bounds sets? 3, 4, 5 of them?
5) Woodbury coming out party possibly?? I hope so, as it was his best performance to date. 11 reb, and played the best D of anyone on Niang.
All in all, Iowa played pretty well on the road against a very good team in ISU. I'm sure Fran won't let these guys get to down about it. Already saw the quote from Fran about Gesell and Marble, and liked that Fran is picking these guys up already:
Marble had 19 points and six assists for the Hawkeyes. But he and Gesell missed crucial free throws they would typically expect to make.
Iowa was just 50 percent from the line in the second half.
"Those are the guys I would have picked. I know they feel terrible right now. I feel for them," Iowa coach Fran McCaffery said. "But if I could have who I want I would pick those two guys."
Ha, this comment is always comical. Kansas needed a banked in 3 at the buzzer to win at home in OT over ISU. We then lost at home (even though it was a screwjob) and on a neutral court in the Big 12 tournament.
Ha, this comment is always comical. Kansas needed a banked in 3 at the buzzer to win at home in OT over ISU. We then lost at home (even though it was a screwjob) and on a neutral court in the Big 12 tournament.
Interesting comparison, Billso. One might say...condemnation.
Lohaus came in as a "project". Woody stepped on campus as highly-rated National recruit. So if Woody is no better...or just marginally better than Lohaus, one could say he's been a bit of a disappointment. As many are.
As I recall Lohaus came in with a reasonable offensive game and three point range which led to his McD's all american status, but was a liability on defense and pretty passive on the glass.
I think Woody has played with toughness since he stepped onto the campus and has shown a great work ethic. His offensive game needs work and like a lot of big men had gotten by on size alone in high school. He's getting better establishing defensive rebounding position. He has been a huge plus on the defensive side of the ball. IMO he is the biggest reason Iowa was a strong defensive team last year after being soft and poor the prior season.
I'm very sorry for using this article , it belongs to student at Iowa. I like his writing and I share it on this thread. I'm ready for B1G season to start and BTT and NCAA tournament and the WARM WEATHER! GO Hawks.
P.S. Go lady Hawks too!