I call it the nebraska effect.Nebraska fires their OCoordinator with 3 games remaining in the season.
Wisconsin fires their OCoordinator with two games remaining.
Ferentz must think he's living in some sort of alternative universe hell. Or as he would put it, 'That's football...today. A sign of the times."
I don't know what Fickell was expecting...Wisky had recruited for decades at every position to build a system and team built on power running the ball. And then expect an 'Air Raid' coach to come in and have immediate success? Seems a little delusional.
I will also say the nebraska effect I mentioned above is what @BigD , @oldhawk12 , and others want to happen at Iowa. There is simply no other explanation for wanting KF fired other than pure ignorance, or wanting to be the next nebraska.I call it the nebraska effect.
Success in the past leads delusional fans to revolt. Which leads to donors and administration making influenced decisions to fire very capable coaches winning 9-10 games every year.
Said delusional fans and administration expect a return to success upon hiring new coaches, and when it doesn’t happen within 2 years they begin the same process of musical coaches over again.
The catch is that with every season the program fails, acquiring a capable head coach becomes more difficult because 1) going to work for a loser is less appealing, 2) coaches know their tenure (and HC career) will likely end being fired and with a legacy of embarrassment, and 3) every year the program sucks recruiting becomes more and more impossible. Once recruiting becomes impossible it’s game over. All you’re left with as HC candidates are middling no-namers chasing cash who don’t care what their legacies are as long as the checks keep clearing.
Wisconsin is about 39% down this road at present. I hope Paul Chryst is on a beach somewhere laughing his ass off.
The problem being that each successive one getting fired makes that job look more like a dumpster fire and decreases the pool of available good coaches, and in turn makes that 75% turn into 80%, then 85%, and so on. Then after you suck long enough, you start only getting leftover recruits that Nick Saban wouldn't even be able to do much with. Once that happens you're cooked and now you're relying on a one-in-a-million unicorn like Osborne, Fry, [insert luck of the draw program revitalizer here]...75% of these hires fail in 3 to 4 years, but you keep hiring a new one until you finally find a winner
There's a reason it hadn't been tried in the BIG recently.. Guess Fickel just had to learn that the hard way. What Purdue did yrs ago with Brees up to the time Kyle Orton was there was about as close to it there's been. But hell those Joe Tiller yrs were prior to like 09-08 I think. It's been awhile.RIP "Air-rade". LMAO!
Well, Nebraska is doubling down with its new OC. He is part of the invention team for Air Raid. Any system can work if you have the right talent to run the system. Therein lies the problem at these schools. Recruiting speed to cold weather schools is a challenge.There's a reason it hadn't been tried in the BIG recently.. Guess Fickel just had to learn that the hard way. What Purdue did yrs ago with Brees up to the time Kyle Orton was there was about as close to it there's been. But hell those Joe Tiller yrs were prior to like 09-08 I think. It's been awhile.
Yeah Purdue had success doing what they did back then. Hell it's what made them relevant. Having NFL level QBs is a good place to start which they had. It's just tough to sustain and nowadays you either catch lightening in a bottle like Indiana has or you're gonna have ups and downs with it.Well, Nebraska is doubling down with its new OC. He is part of the invention team for Air Raid. Any system can work if you have the right talent to run the system. Therein lies the problem at these schools. Recruiting speed to cold weather schools is a challenge.
Recruiting any talent to a program that's become a decade-long running joke is a challenge.Recruiting speed to cold weather schools is a challenge.
Your theory about recruiting doesn't necessarily hold up. Nebraska has indeed been a dumpster fire for years, but my guess is their recruiting classes have outranked Iowa's almost every one of the those years. There are 3 and 4 star recruits who find the stability of Iowa's program attractive, but there are also a lot of 3 and 4 star recruits who are sucked in by the sales pitch of 'fresh', 'exciting', 'wide open offense', and returning a historically great program to glory -- which each new coach can pitch.I call it the nebraska effect.
Success in the past leads delusional fans to revolt. Which leads to donors and administration making influenced decisions to fire very capable coaches winning 9-10 games every year.
Said delusional fans and administration expect a return to success upon hiring new coaches, and when it doesn’t happen within 2 years they begin the same process of musical coaches over again.
The catch is that with every season the program fails, acquiring a capable head coach becomes more difficult because 1) going to work for a loser is less appealing, 2) coaches know their tenure (and HC career) will likely end being fired and with a legacy of embarrassment, and 3) every year the program sucks recruiting becomes more and more impossible. Once recruiting becomes impossible it’s game over. All you’re left with as HC candidates are middling no-namers chasing cash who don’t care what their legacies are as long as the checks keep clearing.
Wisconsin is about 39% down this road at present. I hope Paul Chryst is on a beach somewhere laughing his ass off.
I think Fry is probably a bit hyperbolic about Nebbie, but its hard to argue with the results that program has vomited up the last decade and more.Your theory about recruiting doesn't necessarily hold up. Nebraska has indeed been a dumpster fire for years, but my guess is their recruiting classes have outranked Iowa's almost every one of the those years. There are 3 and 4 star recruits who find the stability of Iowa's program attractive, but there are also a lot of 3 and 4 star recruits who are sucked in by the sales pitch of 'fresh', 'exciting', 'wide open offense', and returning a historically great program to glory -- which each new coach can pitch.
I also think you're overstating your theory about being able to find capable coaches. Nebraska has shown that even with the longest P5 bowl drought in the nation, they will always be able to find capable coaches....now, they haven't yet found the RIGHT coach, but well into the near future they will have no problem finding capable suitors.
I'm plenty hyperbolic most of the time, but when it comes to nebraska I haven't said anything exaggerated. The last time nebraska even played in a bowl game the current crop of recruits was in 3rd grade. When it comes to football the word nebraska only means something to people in their mid 40s and beyond. It's only going to get worse for them from here on out. It doesn't mean anything to be a husker football player anymore other than during your recruitment you didn't have any other options than a team with a 27-56 conference record the past decade that's the butt of every joke in college football.I think Fry is probably a bit hyperbolic about Nebbie, but its hard to argue with the results that program has vomited up the last decade and more.
I agree that Nebraska can and does recruit as well or better than Iowa if measured by stars. But, if measured by a good coach, who can evaluate talent, and then develop that talent into a Big 10 player, KF is light years of anything that Nebbie has done in recruiting. But, can Nebbie get NIL money, facilities, crowd support and resources that match up with Top 25 schools, even with the dumpster fire? Yes. They can. They have. They will. Will that matter? Not without a really good coach.
What Nebraska's problem has been is hiring good ADs who in turn hire good coaches. The leadership has been atrocious. You get the Yo Yo effect of going from Stuck in the mud Solich, to NFL passing guru Callahan, to Asshole Pelini, to nice guy Uncle Mike Riley, to hot young party animal Frost, and now to stable old "knows how to rebuild a program" Rhule. They are throwing darts at the wall and hitting nothing but the wall.
Your ability to describe the past 6 Nebraska coaches in one succinct sentence is Pulitzer worthy!I think Fry is probably a bit hyperbolic about Nebbie, but its hard to argue with the results that program has vomited up the last decade and more.
I agree that Nebraska can and does recruit as well or better than Iowa if measured by stars. But, if measured by a good coach, who can evaluate talent, and then develop that talent into a Big 10 player, KF is light years of anything that Nebbie has done in recruiting. But, can Nebbie get NIL money, facilities, crowd support and resources that match up with Top 25 schools, even with the dumpster fire? Yes. They can. They have. They will. Will that matter? Not without a really good coach.
What Nebraska's problem has been is hiring good ADs who in turn hire good coaches. The leadership has been atrocious. You get the Yo Yo effect of going from Stuck in the mud Solich, to NFL passing guru Callahan, to Asshole Pelini, to nice guy Uncle Mike Riley, to hot young party animal Frost, and now to stable old "knows how to rebuild a program" Rhule. They are throwing darts at the wall and hitting nothing but the wall.