Over/Under Totals for Iowa, Rest of Big Ten

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
Bookmakers do a lot with numbers each and every off season, including their over/under wagers. For the uninitiated, they place a number and you would either wager that a team will win more games than their number or fewer games than their number.


5dimes.com has released it's 'number' for Iowa and it's 5.5. That's the first time in a long, long time where Iowa's total wasn't above .500. I saw this and other totals via a link from Mike Hlas of The Gazette, and you can see the totals for most BCS teams at this link.


Below are the Big Ten totals and my thoughts on each. Since Rutgers and Maryland are not playing a Big Ten schedule this year, I am not going to add them to this discussion. The teams are listed in order of their total:


Ohio State 11: To take the over you have to pick the Buckeyes to have an undefeated season. I happen to think the Buckeyes ARE that much better than everyone in the league, so if I were forced to 'get down' on this game (thank you Governor Ventura) I'd take the over as I don't see the Buckeyes losing a game this year and I believe they will make up one-half of the national title picture.


Michigan 9.5: I'd go with the under. I think 9-3 is the very top shelf for them and seven or eight wins are more likely.


Nebraska 9.5: This feels like a team (schedule) that is on the fence between nine or ten wins, so per usual the sharpies know what they are talking about. I'd lean closer to nine so I'd go under.


Wisconsin 9: I think nine wins is their ceiling. Given the coaching changes, I will take the under here.


Michigan State 8.5: Eight wins is what I see as their realistic ceiling, so under.


Northwestern 8.5: I am going to doubt the Cats one more time and take the under. I think this is a pretty high total for a team who has road games at Cal, Iowa, Wisconsin and Nebraska and hosts Ohio State, Michigan and Michigan State.


Penn State 8: Their schedule is pretty favorable. This program can't afford injuries now given the scholarship reductions and I think eight is their max. If I have to go one way or the other I take the under but eight is a great total here.


Indiana 6: I think the Hoosiers may go 7-5, so I will take the over.


Iowa 5.5: This ten seconds I am more comfortable with five than six.


Minnesota 5.5: I would definitely take the under here, because of their schedule.


Purdue 5:: I'd go with the under here too. I don't know if it's mathematically possible for all of these teams to hit the under.


Illinois 4: One more under for the road; under


On the whole, it's going to be an underwhelming collection of Big Ten teams...another 'down year' for the conference. Ohio State is so far ahead of the next best team and will run away with it. In fact, I have an over/under for you. The number of times Ohio State scores 60 or more points this year. I will put that at 5.5. Any takers?
 
I don't think Whisky will get that many wins and tOSU will drop one shocker. The rest look pretty accurate.
 
Bookmakers do a lot with numbers each and every off season, including their over/under wagers. For the uninitiated, they place a number and you would either wager that a team will win more games than their number or fewer games than their number.


5dimes.com has released it's 'number' for Iowa and it's 5.5. That's the first time in a long, long time where Iowa's total wasn't above .500. I saw this and other totals via a link from Mike Hlas of The Gazette, and you can see the totals for most BCS teams at this link.


Below are the Big Ten totals and my thoughts on each. Since Rutgers and Maryland are not playing a Big Ten schedule this year, I am not going to add them to this discussion. The teams are listed in order of their total:


Ohio State 11: To take the over you have to pick the Buckeyes to have an undefeated season. I happen to think the Buckeyes ARE that much better than everyone in the league, so if I were forced to 'get down' on this game (thank you Governor Ventura) I'd take the over as I don't see the Buckeyes losing a game this year and I believe they will make up one-half of the national title picture.


Michigan 9.5: I'd go with the under. I think 9-3 is the very top shelf for them and seven or eight wins are more likely.


Nebraska 9.5: This feels like a team (schedule) that is on the fence between nine or ten wins, so per usual the sharpies know what they are talking about. I'd lean closer to nine so I'd go under.


Wisconsin 9: I think nine wins is their ceiling. Given the coaching changes, I will take the under here.


Michigan State 8.5: Eight wins is what I see as their realistic ceiling, so under.


Northwestern 8.5: I am going to doubt the Cats one more time and take the under. I think this is a pretty high total for a team who has road games at Cal, Iowa, Wisconsin and Nebraska and hosts Ohio State, Michigan and Michigan State.


Penn State 8: Their schedule is pretty favorable. This program can't afford injuries now given the scholarship reductions and I think eight is their max. If I have to go one way or the other I take the under but eight is a great total here.


Indiana 6: I think the Hoosiers may go 7-5, so I will take the over.


Iowa 5.5: This ten seconds I am more comfortable with five than six.


Minnesota 5.5: I would definitely take the under here, because of their schedule.


Purdue 5:: I'd go with the under here too. I don't know if it's mathematically possible for all of these teams to hit the under.


Illinois 4: One more under for the road; under


On the whole, it's going to be an underwhelming collection of Big Ten teams...another 'down year' for the conference. Ohio State is so far ahead of the next best team and will run away with it. In fact, I have an over/under for you. The number of times Ohio State scores 60 or more points this year. I will put that at 5.5. Any takers?

I am leaning toward 6 games and a bowl victory against a weaker opponent. As the season progresses, there will be signs of development of the younger players, but there just isn't the overall developed talent to compete against the better teams in the B1G.
 
This article is an insult it is not woryh our time. Anyone stupid enough to put Iowa at less than 500 will lose a lot of money over this insult as Weisman runs them over.
 
I see some of the other 5.5 win teams on these bookmakers list and it's just crazy. Iowa is much better than those teams. Tell the bookmakers to take their books and shove them.
 
I see some of the other 5.5 win teams on these bookmakers list and it's just crazy. Iowa is much better than those teams. Tell the bookmakers to take their books and shove them.


Iowa isnt going to be "much better" than very many teams. I think they could surprise some people and win 8 or 9 games but that will take some bounces going our way. They have about 6 win talent.
 
They would probably get national attention but I don't care about that. I care about wins, and the student athletes getting a good education.
 
I think we win more than 5.5. I have no scientific evidence to base this on, just my gut, which is large enough that I listen to it.
 
As an aside, the bookies don't care if this is the number of wins the teams will get. Bookies aren't trying to be correct, they are trying to balance betting. They want an equal number of bets on both sides of it so they break even on the bets and make money on the Vig.
 

Latest posts

Top