^This. It was reported during the game that Hock went to Brain angry about his lack of targets. So Hock must have felt he had been open enough.
All of this praise for BF and his playcalling makes me chuckle a bit. After Davis I guess anything feels like an improvement.
We had run the ball 10x for -16 yards before the Easley 75 yarder. The run game ineptitude set up Abrams leaning in to play the run on that play. You guys really think BF was intentionally trying to go backwards just to set up one pass play? For how long was he planning on doing this? That is kind of risky and stupid strategy as we totally got manhandled in that first quarter. We were lucky we weren't down 14. The genius of Ferentz offensive football started the game with the same game plan we do 99% of the time. They think they can play a superior physical team by playing straight up with them. No wrinkles, no creativity to our offense.
Give BF credit for throwing in the second half I suppose but what was he going to do? Run it another 20x for -50 yards?
And throwing 3 straight times before halftime wasn't aggresive. It was just plain stupid. And Kirk got that right when he used that exact same word to Molly McGrath.
Our defense stepped up again, our offense made enough big plays when we needed it, Miss St shot themselves in the foot, and Morehead might be in Tracy Claeys meathead territory. I mean going for two after their first touchdown (??) but not going for two after their second to put you up by at least a FG? That is some smelly game management there.
We gained 199 yards of offense and were 1/11 on third downs. We played a one-dimensional offensive football team. I am glad we won this meaningless football game. I am always happy we win, but would have liked to have won a couple more meaningful games during the regular season. I guessed 8-5 before the season. I will never expect more than 8 wins from Kirk.