DodgerHawki
Well-Known Member
Hey Ghost we agree..
you make salient points.
If anything, assistants at Duke and Kansas should be scrutinized more closely. The minute someone from Duke or Kansas' staffs make contact with a player that school is immediately in that player's top 5, regardless of how quickly KU or Duke identified that player or worked on him.
I will not dismiss the possibility that a current successful head coach at a Power 6 conference school would take the Iowa job. But I would put it at about a 2% change of happening, short of Iowa offering $4M per year to that coach. Pearl, Hewitt, Marquette's coach, Drew, Travis Ford, etc., even Pastner, all have their programs up and running, with good classes on the way. Why risk your professional reputation for the Iowa job, where your recruiting base is one of the weakest in a major conference?
Forbes would be a risk, but heck, Lute Olson was a risk if we are judging by the criteria offered by many here. Tom Davis was not all that successful at Stanford before coming here. Pearl was a mid-major coach before taking UT to heights. Izzo was an assistant. Painter was a SIU. Crean was an assistant before going to Marquette. Bill Self went from Tulsa to Illinois. The list goes on and on.
The point is there are a handful of programs (UCLA, Kentucky, Kansas, Duke, Indiana, UNC, maybe a few others) that can reasonably go out and expect to hire a proven coach from a power conference. The rest just can't.
What the hell is so special about the assistants at Duke and Kansas that they deserve special consideration over everyone else.
I for one think that it is important to hire a guy who will be comfortable at Iowa, and vice-versa. Iowa is a different place, and no every coach can survive here. Lute didn't like it, Raveling didn't like it, Alford never got it, and Lick never got it.
In the last 30 years, we have found one coach who understands the state, understands the people, and acclimated himself into the community.
So as far as I am concerned, having a guy who can be comfortable at Iowa is a HUGE concern. Certainyl not the most important factor, but a big one.
you make salient points.
If anything, assistants at Duke and Kansas should be scrutinized more closely. The minute someone from Duke or Kansas' staffs make contact with a player that school is immediately in that player's top 5, regardless of how quickly KU or Duke identified that player or worked on him.
I will not dismiss the possibility that a current successful head coach at a Power 6 conference school would take the Iowa job. But I would put it at about a 2% change of happening, short of Iowa offering $4M per year to that coach. Pearl, Hewitt, Marquette's coach, Drew, Travis Ford, etc., even Pastner, all have their programs up and running, with good classes on the way. Why risk your professional reputation for the Iowa job, where your recruiting base is one of the weakest in a major conference?
Forbes would be a risk, but heck, Lute Olson was a risk if we are judging by the criteria offered by many here. Tom Davis was not all that successful at Stanford before coming here. Pearl was a mid-major coach before taking UT to heights. Izzo was an assistant. Painter was a SIU. Crean was an assistant before going to Marquette. Bill Self went from Tulsa to Illinois. The list goes on and on.
The point is there are a handful of programs (UCLA, Kentucky, Kansas, Duke, Indiana, UNC, maybe a few others) that can reasonably go out and expect to hire a proven coach from a power conference. The rest just can't.