tweeterhawk
Well-Known Member
Even if not from the coaches, I am hoping the players all have Nov. 13 circled on their calendars and a pin-up of the photo clearly showing the face mask.
Even if not from the coaches, I am hoping the players all have Nov. 13 circled on their calendars and a pin-up of the photo clearly showing the face mask.
I believe that even though it happened after the fumble, it would have negated the touchdown because it happened before there was a change in possession.Okay, definitely a facemask, but I have a question, since it's after the fumble. Would the refs have ruled it a TD and assessed the penalty on the kickoff? Or does a personal foul automatically wipe out the entire play?
I remember when this happened watching the replay very closely. It LOOKS like it was a facemask by #90, but it wasn't. I can't find the video or the angle showing it, but the guy didn't actually even touch Stanzi.
I know this won't be popular, but there wasn't a facemask.
I remember when this happened watching the replay very closely. It LOOKS like it was a facemask by #90, but it wasn't. I can't find the video or the angle showing it, but the guy didn't actually even touch Stanzi.
I know this won't be popular, but there wasn't a facemask.
Yes it was clearly a facemask.
But the worst call in this game was the holding penalty on Wegher's long touchdown run - give me a break, the NW guy was pancaked!!
Everything turned out great with the Orange Bowl championship, but we sure owe NW one!
Man, I hate Northwestern.
What I don't get is how the hell the referee, clearly in a position to see the facemask, misses it. One of the principal responsibilities of the referee in a seven-man crew is to watch for illegal hits on the quarterback. It appears from the clip he is looking directly at the contact.
I hope the Big 10 refereeing office reviewed this play with the crew.
2 years in a row NW has taken out an Iowa offensive MVP with DIRTY PLAY! Thats a fact not an opinion, they are my most hated team in the Big Ten.