Next year's rotation

franstheman

Well-Known Member
What do you guys think? We'll be deeper and more talented and diverse in our personnel than we've been in a while. I think we'll have the personnel on the bench to match up with small, quick teams or big and powerful ones.

Here's my rotation:


1. Gesell/Clemmons

2. Marble/Oglesby/Ingram

3. White/May/Ingram

4. Basabe/McCabe/Meyer

5. Woodbury/Olaseni/Meyer


I think we go 10 deep or maybe even 11 deep in our regular rotation next year. Should be a high flying, pressing team. Will be fun!
 
Last edited:
What do you guys think? We'll be deeper and more talented and diverse in our personnel than we've been in a while. I think we'll have the personnel on the bench to match up with small, quick teams or big and powerful ones.

Here's my rotation:


1. Gesell/Clemmons

My suggestion is to play at least five guys at all times.
 
Looks like Fran is challenging the Herbster for most threads started that have already been started award for 2012.
 
haha i appreciate your nomination, money. But no i haven't been on the boards for a while so i appoligize if i bring up topics that were on here recently. the hawkeye hoops fever has just recently started to come back to me boys.
 
Gesell/Clemmons
Oglesby/Ingram
Marble/White/May
Basabe/McCabe
Woodbury/Olaseni/Meyer

I think marble has size to play 3 and you have to go with your best athletes and i think that would be the best athletes i look for whoever the starting 5 is to battle with anyone in the B1G!
 
Yeah and I'm sure that who starts doesn't matter much with how much fran goes to his bench. The top nine or ten usually get about the same minutes.
 
haha i appreciate your nomination, money. But no i haven't been on the boards for a while so i appoligize if i bring up topics that were on here recently. the hawkeye hoops fever has just recently started to come back to me boys.

Fever is spreading rapidly. Welcome back.
 
I hijacked another threat to say this, so I might as well say it here too: White is not a wing player (at least for any substantial minutes). We are far more versatile playing three true perimeter players alongside White. We get faster, more athletic, better ballhandling, and better shooting. We are fare more skilled and harder to guard. White is good run-jump athlete for a post player, he has nice perimeter skills for a post, and has nice ball-handling for a post. As a wing, White is never going to be a perimeter drive-drive threat, absent a wide-open seam to the bucket. White doesn't change directions with his dribble very well, and if there is anything Eric May has taught us, its that 18 year old kids don't suddenly learn to dribble the ball the dramatically better by age 21. His shooting is just average as well.

Defensively, he is big enough to guard most "power forwards" in the Big 10, quick enough to hedge on ball screens, heck maybe even switch straight up in the right match-ups. But as a wing, he lacks lateral quickness. He won't be able to pressure the ball, because his man will blow by him. A good ballhandler would get White so off balance in isolation situations, they could easily get separation for a jumper for get White to foul them. Can you imagine White guarding Marble? It would get ugly.

White just needs to work on defensive rebounding position, maybe develop a go-to post move, and keep refining his shooting skills. He would have a very well-rounded offensive game. Defensively he is big enough to guard most "power forwards" in the Big 10, quick enough to hedge on ball screens, heck maybe even switch straight up in the right match-ups.

My rant is over. I really just don't like White playing many minutes on the wing.
 
pg - gesell, clemmons, marble
sg - ogelsby, ingram, gesell, marble
sf - marble, white, may
pf - basabe, mccabe, white, meyer
c - woodbury, mccabe, meyer, olaseni

i see gesell and clemmons getting similar time and marble playing a little at pg. ogelsby is our top spot up and i think he will improve a lot over the off-season with ingram as a back up and marble and gesell getting some minutes here. marble is our top wing and may just wont quite be strong enough to start anymore and white will give a few minutes on the wing. basabe will benefit from more true posts being around look for him to reemerge next year backed up by white and mccabe and meyer. woodbury will be a breath of fresh air at the 5 with mccabe and olaseni and meyer backing him up.

i honestly think only 1 player averages over 25 min a game next year because of the depth...devyn marble (i think he is around 28-30 min). the rest will be 5 min for the small roles (olaseni), 10 min for some, 15 min for others, and some around 20 min. if we can set up a solid press and really run the floor we wont have to worry about being tired.

i see us playing 11 guys consistently (12 when olaseni plays).
 
I find it amusing that after 20 games his freshman year in college you're convinced that White is a liability at the wing. What is great about White thus far is that he will get better and cause matchup problems. He is versatile enough to play the perimeter and the post. I would tend to disagree that we become a better shooting team with him at 4, at least not in all cases. Its a luxury to have a player his size that can log minutes at the wing against bigger teams, and move him to the 4 when we need more speed on the floor. Also, White has numerous times this year created his own shot off the dribble, and this is something that a player can improve on throughout a college career.
 
its easy to play 11 or 12 when you have the talent, and everybody accepts their place in the rotation and their duties when on the floor
 

Latest posts

Top