Not playing quality ooc opponents is why Iowa doesn't get the respect many think they are due.
From page 106 of Al Grady's "25 Years With the Fighting Hawkeyes": However, Iowa came away from the hard-hitting defensive game with a lot of players banged up, and Fry again commented on the philosophy of scheduling. "We enjoy the challenge of big intersectional games", he said, "but they don't count toward the championship. It's a lot easier playing a team that is not as physically strong. You're not so beaten up, you look good and you gain confidence. That is the only way to win consistently is to have a great schedule".
From page 95 of the same book: "Next year we'll have Nebraska right where we want 'em", said Hayden. "Off our schedule"
And finally, from page 110: It was important to note that finally...finally...Iowa was through "warming up" against teams like Penn State and Nebraska and Oklahoma and UCLA. The non-conference schedule was Drake, Northern Illinois and Iowa State. And if some critics wanted to pooh-pooh that sort of schedule, it was okay with Fry.
There you have it folks. The (possible) origin of the "modern" Iowa schedule philosophy.
The fact is, Notre Dame, and many others, won't do a home-and-home. They either want two games in THEIR stadium, or, at best, a two-and-one, with the "one" in Iowa City being the last game. Which, of course, gives them time to find another team and back out of the game in Iowa City by paying a nominal (for a blue-blood) cost.
No $EC team is coming to Iowa City. Put that dream away. Missouri, as a Big 12 member, backed out in order to play some less-than-powerful team from an after-thought conference. They aren't busting down walls to play now. There are some ACC and Pac 12 teams that will do it. But with nine-game schedule and the continued hard-on to play Iowa State every year on a home-and-home basis, there is no way around the fact that most years will feature one cupcake and a MAC/Mountain West/Sun Belt/C-USA type of team. If we could crystal ball ISU staying "down", that would be one thing, but as long as they treat the game as their Super Bowl, Iowa has to continue treating it like a P5 game.
From page 106 of Al Grady's "25 Years With the Fighting Hawkeyes": However, Iowa came away from the hard-hitting defensive game with a lot of players banged up, and Fry again commented on the philosophy of scheduling. "We enjoy the challenge of big intersectional games", he said, "but they don't count toward the championship. It's a lot easier playing a team that is not as physically strong. You're not so beaten up, you look good and you gain confidence. That is the only way to win consistently is to have a great schedule".
From page 95 of the same book: "Next year we'll have Nebraska right where we want 'em", said Hayden. "Off our schedule"
And finally, from page 110: It was important to note that finally...finally...Iowa was through "warming up" against teams like Penn State and Nebraska and Oklahoma and UCLA. The non-conference schedule was Drake, Northern Illinois and Iowa State. And if some critics wanted to pooh-pooh that sort of schedule, it was okay with Fry.
There you have it folks. The (possible) origin of the "modern" Iowa schedule philosophy.
The fact is, Notre Dame, and many others, won't do a home-and-home. They either want two games in THEIR stadium, or, at best, a two-and-one, with the "one" in Iowa City being the last game. Which, of course, gives them time to find another team and back out of the game in Iowa City by paying a nominal (for a blue-blood) cost.
No $EC team is coming to Iowa City. Put that dream away. Missouri, as a Big 12 member, backed out in order to play some less-than-powerful team from an after-thought conference. They aren't busting down walls to play now. There are some ACC and Pac 12 teams that will do it. But with nine-game schedule and the continued hard-on to play Iowa State every year on a home-and-home basis, there is no way around the fact that most years will feature one cupcake and a MAC/Mountain West/Sun Belt/C-USA type of team. If we could crystal ball ISU staying "down", that would be one thing, but as long as they treat the game as their Super Bowl, Iowa has to continue treating it like a P5 game.
Didn't know ND became a power house.
At least Hayden won those games 52-0 instead of losing some of them. Times have changed; recruiting is national for everyone with 24 hour news cycles, social media, etc, Maybe 35 years ago Iowa fielded physically weaker teams than the big boys; but that certainly would not be true, today. Now that we're in an age of National Championship Playoffs, your non conference helps or hurts you when it comes to post season. Hayden had 1 less non con per season than kirk has. That makes it completely different. Why not play Alabama on a neutral field to get a huge t.v. splash? Many folks on this board were against playing kNU on Black Friday. Now, we understand the benefits of playing that game (now that we've won some).
My guess is Wisconsin will play Notre Dame and two cupcakes in those seasons. Iowa does not have that option because it's locked into the series with Iowa State. If you want to see the Hawkeyes play another Power 5 in the non-conference, the Cyclones must go.
Tulsa was an away gameActually HF had a bad bad bad loss to Tulsa. If I'm remembering straight, when they scheduled KSU and Colorado, they were terrible, but on the upswing when they caught Iowa.
Yes, it was a you play most at our place and well come to you. They played 4 times over about 8 years.Tulsa was an away game
The solution is either Iowa State gets good or iowa state has to be removed from the schedule. Wisconsin doesn't have a power 5 in-state rivalry that the Iowa Corn Growers demand like Iowa does.
Also, Wisconsin and ND are playing at Lambeau and Soldier Field. So they are neutral locations, not home/home.
Right, so if Iowa/ND struck a similar deal, where would they play? Would they play 2 games at Soldier Field? In reality, it would probably be a 1 game only deal at Soldier Field.