Moore Gone at Michigan....

MelroseHawkins said:
Probably, and let's face it, planes can go anywhere in a matter of a few hours so prob didn't really play a part in it that much.
Click to expand...
I'm guessing these super high-profile coaches all have it in their contracts that they get on-demand use of private jets.

I know even before all this Monopoly money stuff started happening in the coaching world KF had a certain number of jet hours available to him and his family in his contract.
 


ssckelley said:
I know what you were referring too and I'll stand my ground that the public shaming is not deserved if she was the one who got assaulted. This is why many women don't report abuse and while I agree she shouldn't have been sleeping with a man that is married with 3 kids she still did not deserve to be assaulted and then shamed for it. Assault is ALWAYS wrong and she shouldn't have to suffer extra consequences for reporting it.
Click to expand...
Are you talking about like sexual assault, or are you talking assault yesterday after this whole thing blew up?

Because I've not heard anything about either one happening. I don't know for sure who the assault piece was towards, but what's out there now is that this was a consensual affair, she got pregnant and it couldn't be kept under the rug, and the assault piece was him blowing a gasket after he got fired and the assault wasn't against her.

Even if he put hands on her yesterday because he was mad, she still doesn't get any coddling about the affair thing. Sorry, but that doesn't wipe out the public consequences of what she did which was blow up a family.
 


Fryowa said:
Are you talking about like sexual assault, or are you talking assault yesterday after this whole thing blew up?

Because I've not heard anything about either one happening. I don't know for sure who the assault piece was towards, but what's out there now is that this was a consensual affair, she got pregnant and it couldn't be kept under the rug, and the assault piece was him blowing a gasket after he got fired and the assault wasn't against her.

Even if he put hands on her yesterday because he was mad, she still doesn't get any coddling about the affair thing. Sorry, but that doesn't wipe out the public consequences of what she did...which was blow up a family.
Click to expand...
I'm just speculating. I'm wondering if everything came to the top with his wife after he got home an she possibly was the one who had to call. I could see it getting pretty nasty after he came home letting her know he was fired and the affair coming to the top.
 


MelroseHawkins said:
I'm just speculating. I'm wondering if everything came to the top with his wife after he got home an she possibly was the one who had to call. I could see it getting pretty nasty after he came home letting her know he was fired and the affair coming to the top.
Click to expand...
That's what I've read but again, no one knows until the dust settles.
 


Fryowa said:
Are you talking about like sexual assault, or are you talking assault yesterday after this whole thing blew up?

Because I've not heard anything about either one happening. I don't know for sure who the assault piece was towards, but what's out there now is that this was a consensual affair, she got pregnant and it couldn't be kept under the rug, and the assault piece was him blowing a gasket after he got fired and the assault wasn't against her.

Even if he put hands on her yesterday because he was mad, she still doesn't get any coddling about the affair thing. Sorry, but that doesn't wipe out the public consequences of what she did...which was blow up a family.
Click to expand...

It didn't sound like it was sexual assault, sounds like she was threatened.

Final attempt to explain my stance on this and I'm moving on. When a woman gets assaulted, it's wrong regardless of the circumstances, and should not come with additional consequences for reporting it.
 


ssckelley said:
It didn't sound like it was sexual assault, sounds like she was threatened.

Final attempt to explain my stance on this and I'm moving on. When a woman gets assaulted, it's wrong regardless of the circumstances, and should not come with additional consequences for reporting it.
Click to expand...
I get it, we are talking the same thing probably. I agree no assault is justified, but assault or not she deserves any shaming she gets for being a homewrecker. She doesn't get a pass for doing that just because in the course of the fallout she got threatened or whatever.
 




MelroseHawkins said:
I'm just speculating. I'm wondering if everything came to the top with his wife after he got home an she possibly was the one who had to call. I could see it getting pretty nasty after he came home letting her know he was fired and the affair coming to the top.
Click to expand...
Wish Paul Harvey was still around to be able to tell us the rest of the story once the dust settles to all this. It's pretty wild. What did he say to her when he got home and then once he left to go to the mistresses house. And then what all went on when he got there. With the rumors being he broke in and had a knife threatening to kill her and him.

Did the cops that arrested him have body cams going? If so that could be interesting. Imagine his kids down the road being subjected to seeing that as if all this isn't bad enough already. It's nuts
 




ssckelley said:
It didn't sound like it was sexual assault, sounds like she was threatened.

Final attempt to explain my stance on this and I'm moving on. When a woman gets assaulted, it's wrong regardless of the circumstances, and should not come with additional consequences for reporting it.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure anybody is opposing what you are saying. I think pretty much all are on the same page.
 


Fryowa said:
Moore's wife and kids are the only victims in this thing.
Click to expand...
And Michigan! Poor old Michigan. This is NOT the way a "Michigan Man" Behaves. Eye roll

Whatever moral/intellectual high ground Michigan once lorded over OSU in that rivalry is long dead. They are becoming Scandal U.
 


Fryowa said:
I work with a single chick in her 30s who looks similar to this one, and part of that requires us to message back and forth since we work in offices about 30 miles apart, sometimes outside working hours. This co-worker is 100% not interested in a guy like me, but when she got hired on the first thing I did was tell my other half that I have to work with and text a female who looks like mid 90s Jennifer Anniston and her name is XYZ, and you can look at my phone any time you want no questions asked.

She laughed at me and told me I had no chance with said female even if I wanted to do something stupid (which I don't). That's the relationship we have, neither is the worried type. But...I'm not a guy to leave any ambiguity in my personal life. I also don't drink, which is how a lot of these things get started with people who otherwise seem well-adjusted and level-headed, unfortunately.
Click to expand...
I've never met you, Fry, but I am confident your better half is correct on this issue. :)
 


If you make the decision to sleep around, realize you may likely lose your spouse and damage your relationship with your kids forever.

That's a pretty big consequence to weigh for a little fun.

But if you go ahead with it anyway, just pick someone who isn't employed by the same company or organization. And certainly not someone who is a direct report. Having your family life fall apart is bad enough...no need to destroy your professional life (and long term career opportunities) at the same time.
 


ssckelley said:
So only ugly people qualify for these jobs. lol
Click to expand...
Agree. That guy seems do be making it come across as a , "Well, what did you expect to happen" kind of thing which is dumb.

They both knew he was married with lids, and both danced with the devil.

He doesn't get a pass because she's hot, and she doesn't get a pass because she's hot.
 








hawkdrummer1 said:
So, discriminate against attractive women? There's a twist.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but there some cases where that's the reason why they got the job in the first place. Best person should get the job regardless of their appearance, but I don't think that was the case here.

She is still employed by Michigan, she has yet to be fired.
 




ssckelley said:
Yeah, but there some cases where that's the reason why they got the job in the first place. Best person should get the job regardless of their appearance, but I don't think that was the case here.

She is still employed by Michigan, she has yet to be fired.
Click to expand...
If I'm Michigan I wouldn't touch firing her with a 30' pole.

Just for clarity I think she should be fired, but I still ain't touching that with a 30' pole. The court of public opinion is too mighty here.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.


Latest posts

Share this page






Top