I'm not sure I'd call the offensive line great, but I'd say they are pretty damn good and probably Number 4 as far as productivity in the B10. When a group gives up 12 sacks, half of which were coverage sacks, you know damn well they are pretty good at protecting the QB. Now you factor in you don't have a running back or receiver in the top 7 or 8 at running or receiving, you may want to ask yourself a few questions. Agreeing with another poster here, how many yards does a Carlos Hyde / Melvin Gordon get behind Iowa's line? 300 to 400 more is my guess. Is our problem with the offensive line or at the skill positions? I think it's more the skill positions at this juncture and would say to most, that at this level...running backs need to be able to create on their own, and make cuts that maximize the yardage gained. Here's an example...in the NC game, I watched Tre Mason take a hand off that was going off tackle to the left. FSU had penetration to the left and he immediately cut right, used speed to get the edge around the right end and gained 25 yards on a play that was designed to go left. There was no doubt, he made 25 yards on his own essentially using vision, speed, and ability. Where did you see anything remotely like that happen this year? His blockers need to hold a block for about 1.2 seconds...on the stretch to Weisman, they better create a seam somewhere around the 2.5 second mark. That's my point.
Our running backs, other than maybe Canzeri, aren't that kind of playmakers. I'm not saying we need Tre Mason, as he's special, but I'm saying we need guys that can help the offensive line and put pressure on the defense. We shouldn't have to dominate a team up front all the time to have a 100 yard rusher.