InNormwetrust
Well-Known Member
Right. But who the man is hasn't changed. It's still Ohio State.
So far. When the smoke clears, we'll see who else resides in our conference that we will have to beat to be the man.
Right. But who the man is hasn't changed. It's still Ohio State.
I don't. And when I write columns I choose to differentiate things that way and I pay the freight around here
What?
I completely agree, fellow western Iowan. We will soon be the ISU of the B10.
Four super conferences IMO will (finally!!) bring the advent of a true playoff. As long as we're talking a complete paradigm change in college FB, might as well go the full monte.
I think this is "phase 2" to the whole expansion plot. These super conferences will make it easier to implement a playoff system.
What?
I think this is "phase 2" to the whole expansion plot. These super conferences will make it easier to implement a playoff system.
Not sure how potentially being in a division with Nebraska, Texas, and others helps us out. Also Nebraska and Texas have huge fan following, probably better then ours...so when push comes to shove they get selected over us. Things I like but things that really scare me...didn't know I was the only one!There's one in every bunch.
Not sure how potentially being in a division with Nebraska, Texas, and others helps us out. Also Nebraska and Texas have huge fan following, probably better then ours...so when push comes to shove they get selected over us. Things I like but things that really scare me...didn't know I was the only one!
Four superconference's will be the beginning of the end of the BCS alliance.
The Big 12 is (was) often as strong or stronger than the Big 10, so I doubt that is a real concern. They have their turkeys, but so do we.
I believe, and have firmly believed for a while that expasion is bad for Iowa. Iowa is "office hot", which means in the Big 10, our office, we are one of the hottest in the office.
Iowa is not "night club hot". The sexier the competition, the worse it is for us.