My kid is 11 and will play his 4th year of tackle this fall. He’s not a standout player, and I’ve been involved in sports and coaching long enough to know that he will probably play junior high and high school ball and that’s it, no college. He loves it and his friends all play, so I let him.
Our league practices twice a week for 50 minutes. One day is helmets only but no contact, and one day is pads and contact, but only for 30 minutes of it. Then they have 6 games on Saturdays.
I played football in junior high and high school, and contrary to what most of you think I don’t suffer from anything cognitively. So did 40 other people I went to high school with and all of the ones I talk to are still doing just fine. While I think there is justification for parents wanting their kids not to play, I do feel that it’s more prevalent in people who spend years in high speed full contact ball, and I also think some people are more susceptible than others which is why Troy Aikman can broadcast a game and Jim McMahon is probably going to be in a nursing home in 5 years.
Bottom line is, when I see the tiny amount of low speed contact that kid’s have in a league that does a good job of limiting contact, I think to myself that I smacked my head plenty of times when I was a preteen doing stupid normal boy stuff. Way more than my son ever has because we protect our kids more these days. I do let him play and he knows that if he ever has a concussion we are stepping away and we’ll talk once he gets to HS.
In my mind youth football by itself isn’t the problem, it’s years of repeated hits and continuing after the first concussion adding up. Are certain kids more susceptible than others? Sure. But that’s the same for anything in life.[