homerHAWKeye777
Well-Known Member
.... because we were breaking in a semi-experienced QB to be a first-year regular starter for us.
... because we were returning only 2 starters at the skill positions who appeared to be all-Big 10 quality talents.
... because our group of RBs were relatively so young and inexperienced.
... because we only returned one regular starter on the DL from the prior season.
... because we return only 2 starters at LB and much of our more promising depth there are underclassmen.
.... okay, okay, okay ... sure, we have a really experienced and talented OL ... however, that obviously won't be enough to propel us to a good season, right?
... oh yeah, and BTW, we were completely off the national radar ... nobody in the media thought that we'd do crap in the Big 10.
... lastly, we were so close to having a great season the prior year ... only to lose 5 games by a ridiculously small margin. However, since we lost so many high-quality guys ... many going off to the NFL ... obviously we just CAN'T do better in the following season, right?
-----------------------------------------
While the description above PERFECTLY describes our 2011 Hawk squad, it actually was describing none other than our 2002 Hawkeyes!
There are some pretty crazy parallels there, eh?
By no stretch of the imagination do I expect us to play at the level of the 2002 Hawks. However, I do expect for the 2011 Hawks to be competitive with ANYONE and EVERYONE they play. Furthermore, I do expect them to win A LOT of games ... and I expect them to end up landing in a pretty good bowl.
However, if the O can remain healthy and play up to its potential ... then I don't see why the O cannot help the D quite a lot in 2011. The O obviously gave the D some wiggle-room in '02. Heck, while the '05 Hawks get a bit maligned ... that O ended up being a very good group too ... potentially being only a 2-loss squad were it not for the injury to Hinkel.
I'm really excited about this 2011 squad ... I can't wait to see them continue to develop and see what they're capable of doing!
... because we were returning only 2 starters at the skill positions who appeared to be all-Big 10 quality talents.
... because our group of RBs were relatively so young and inexperienced.
... because we only returned one regular starter on the DL from the prior season.
... because we return only 2 starters at LB and much of our more promising depth there are underclassmen.
.... okay, okay, okay ... sure, we have a really experienced and talented OL ... however, that obviously won't be enough to propel us to a good season, right?
... oh yeah, and BTW, we were completely off the national radar ... nobody in the media thought that we'd do crap in the Big 10.
... lastly, we were so close to having a great season the prior year ... only to lose 5 games by a ridiculously small margin. However, since we lost so many high-quality guys ... many going off to the NFL ... obviously we just CAN'T do better in the following season, right?
-----------------------------------------
While the description above PERFECTLY describes our 2011 Hawk squad, it actually was describing none other than our 2002 Hawkeyes!
There are some pretty crazy parallels there, eh?
By no stretch of the imagination do I expect us to play at the level of the 2002 Hawks. However, I do expect for the 2011 Hawks to be competitive with ANYONE and EVERYONE they play. Furthermore, I do expect them to win A LOT of games ... and I expect them to end up landing in a pretty good bowl.
However, if the O can remain healthy and play up to its potential ... then I don't see why the O cannot help the D quite a lot in 2011. The O obviously gave the D some wiggle-room in '02. Heck, while the '05 Hawks get a bit maligned ... that O ended up being a very good group too ... potentially being only a 2-loss squad were it not for the injury to Hinkel.
I'm really excited about this 2011 squad ... I can't wait to see them continue to develop and see what they're capable of doing!