Lunardi-Updated Bubble

Again everyone on the bubble has losses, bad losses even. The committee cares fsr more about who you can beat than who you can loose to. Your argument is like all those guys who said we had no chance at the NIT cause of the campbell loss.

That's not what you said. You said "deserve" to be in. They have a crap ton of over 100 RPI losses, so once again, no.
 
Again everyone on the bubble has losses, bad losses even. The committee cares fsr more about who you can beat than who you can loose to. Your argument is like all those guys who said we had no chance at the NIT cause of the campbell loss.

I hope we don't loose to many more teams.
 
Again everyone on the bubble has losses, bad losses even. The committee cares fsr more about who you can beat than who you can loose to. Your argument is like all those guys who said we had no chance at the NIT cause of the campbell loss.

no one else on the bubble has 7 bad losses, and no one has lost to a team nearly as bad as Old Dominion. I think part of the resume/body of work idea is you have to be accountable for every game you played all season. Another thing is that Virginia's schedule is weaker than Iowa's, but that goes unmentioned in Virginia's case despite its huge significance to Iowa's resume.
 
Lunardi is a fool, because Witchita State is a lead pipe lock and doesn't belong on any of these bubble lists.
 
That's not what you said. You said "deserve" to be in. They have a crap ton of over 100 RPI losses, so once again, no.

They absolutley deserve to be in based on the committes criteria. The committe rewards teams who have demonstrated an ability to beat top teams. Virginia has demonstrated that and Iowa hasn't. If Iowa had beaten Indiana or MSU then all those other things like bad losses etc would come into play, but they didn't, and it won't.

If Iowa beats MSU today then maybe things are different.
 

Latest posts

Top