hawkeyebob62
Well-Known Member
I still felt Ruddock had some talent and was a good QB, but watching the games that we had the one thing with Ruddock that I stand by was I don't think he was going to go out and win a game for you if he had to. CJ I thought had that ability with some of his more aggressive check downs and his legs. The thing that helped Ruddock at Michigan is was the talent that surrounded him didn't require him to go out and win the game if he played well.
Even though we have had an up and down year I still would feel that when the game comes down to making a play to win I would rather have CJ than Ruddock. The thing that bugged me about Ruddock and bugs me about other players is when they get their spot taken away from them they just take their ball and go home. Go out and earn the spot back. Obviously it worked out well for both guys and I wish Ruddock the best. He was a good hawk and got his degree.
I would normally agree about the taking his ball, but I think the way it was handled during bowl practices and the announcement pretty much left him no choice. And it also implies, to me, that he might have thrived under a different OC and better schemes/play calls. Then again, what QB WOULDN'T fare better under that scenario?