Idiotic division names. Imagine the writers and broadcasters referring to the "Leaders of the Leaders Division..." And the names being alliterative just adds to the confusion. The names sound like something 4th graders might come up with. Silvanthalas is right: Imagine if the SEC or Pac-10/12 or Big 12/10 had come up with such ridiculous names. We'd be laughing like hyenas. Huge failure Big Ten leaders...or is it legends?
Don't really like the division names. There's no concrete meaning attached to each (someone said post-modern, which I thought was a good observation), and therefore will be really hard for people outside of the conference to even remember who's in which division. East/West River/Lakes would even have been better than this.
I think they found the perfect names for the two divisions... and then they put them on the championship trophy.
Stagg and Paterno show the history of the conference and are unique to the Big Ten. They should have been the names of the divisions. Instead, our division is named after a sports bar and the other sounds like a corporate seminar. These names could have been used by literally any other conference in any other sport. What a wasted opportunity...
Because now when 2 or more schools out East get added it won't look stupid with a Rutgers in the East and a Syracuse in the West. I'm not saying these 2 will join just making a point of why you don't hadicap yourself with geography names.