Keith Murphy's interview with Chris Doyle

[Fryowa]

Yeah, I agree with all that. Realizing some kids need to be handled differently than others is one characteristic of a great coach (or leader, manager, etc.). It doesn't mean they necessarily need special accommodations. But the end goal for both player and coaches is to maximize the athlete's potential. Sometimes it takes problem solving and different approaches to reach peak performance.

It seems like Doyle reflected on that with a little space and time, which is cool. But yeah, to your point, that reflection seems to fall short. Didn't Dolph come right out and say he had some hard conversations with good friends after his King Kong comparison, plus went through some education, and learned about implicit bias?

We are all on our own journeys of self awareness. I would have found the interview more compelling if Doyle would have swallowed hard and described some tough conversations he had with black players since his departure...maybe some incidences where there is great mutual respect, but upon his request, he got some feedback that was tough for him to hear but important nonetheless. Maybe those conversations haven't happened. I'd think those would be important for reflection and growth.

Doyle seems to be one of those guys who has an almost impossible time saying he was wrong because it’s to him a show of weakness and shows a lack of awareness, which he can’t do. I think he feels like the lesser of the two evils is for him is to admit shortcomings in his training style but die on the hill of never allowing himself to admit any racial bias period. Whether intentional or not.

That’s where it falls short for me.

 

[justwinbaby]

Doyle seems to be one of those guys who has an almost impossible time saying he was wrong because it’s to him a show of weakness and shows a lack of awareness, which he can’t do. I think he feels like the lesser of the two evils is for him is to admit shortcomings in his training style but die on the hill of never allowing himself to admit any racial bias period. Whether intentional or not.

That’s where it falls short for me.

 

[NorthKCHawk]

I appreciate everyone else's comments.

I would just add that one thing that this does show is that if you are a general asshole to those around you, that tends to come back and bite you in the ass. Whether you want to call that Karma or Zen or whatever. The golden rule applies. When you treat others like shit, you might get wrongfully accused of being a racist, or a bully, or sexist, or bad at your job, or a host of other things that separates you from your job. If you treat your employees, or in this case, student athletes, with dignity and respect, the odds of someone accusing you of wrongdoing drop dramatically.

I don't know whether he was racist or not, but in a sport made up of majority black athletes, being a universal jerk may lead to the perception from some minority players that his jerkiness had a racial component. Once that is put out there, its hard to put back in the bottle these days.

I have zero sympathy for this guy. Be a better human and this never would have happened. Same for guys like Bobby Knight. That sort of asshole could, unfortunately, exist in high school and college in the 80s and 90s. Times have changed. For the better.

 

[trj]

I appreciate everyone else's comments.

I would just add that one thing that this does show is that if you are a general asshole to those around you, that tends to come back and bite you in the ass. Whether you want to call that Karma or Zen or whatever. The golden rule applies. When you treat others like shit, you might get wrongfully accused of being a racist, or a bully, or sexist, or bad at your job, or a host of other things that separates you from your job. If you treat your employees, or in this case, student athletes, with dignity and respect, the odds of someone accusing you of wrongdoing drop dramatically.

I don't know whether he was racist or not, but in a sport made up of majority black athletes, being a universal jerk may lead to the perception from some minority players that his jerkiness had a racial component. Once that is put out there, its hard to put back in the bottle these days.

I have zero sympathy for this guy. Be a better human and this never would have happened. Same for guys like Bobby Knight. That sort of asshole could, unfortunately, exist in high school and college in the 80s and 90s. Times have changed. For the better.

The sport is made up by a majority of black athletes. However, the racial makeup of the Iowa roster in most years is around 50/50. It may skew 60/40 one way or the other occasionally, but normally it is around a 50/50 split.

Not sure if that supports your argument or counters it I am just throwing it out there.

 

[Fryowa]

I appreciate everyone else's comments.

I would just add that one thing that this does show is that if you are a general asshole to those around you, that tends to come back and bite you in the ass. Whether you want to call that Karma or Zen or whatever. The golden rule applies. When you treat others like shit, you might get wrongfully accused of being a racist, or a bully, or sexist, or bad at your job, or a host of other things that separates you from your job. If you treat your employees, or in this case, student athletes, with dignity and respect, the odds of someone accusing you of wrongdoing drop dramatically.

I don't know whether he was racist or not, but in a sport made up of majority black athletes, being a universal jerk may lead to the perception from some minority players that his jerkiness had a racial component. Once that is put out there, its hard to put back in the bottle these days.

I have zero sympathy for this guy. Be a better human and this never would have happened. Same for guys like Bobby Knight. That sort of asshole could, unfortunately, exist in high school and college in the 80s and 90s. Times have changed. For the better.

+1

If he could give up an ounce of his pride and admit he might have a chance at redeeming what’s left of his career. I honestly think he believes that nothing he did could’ve been perceived as racially biased, and if that’s what he really believes he’s not going to admit it.

At this point I’m over it. He’s sleeping in the bed he made and both he and Iowa seem to have both moved on. It’s not something that’s keeping me up at night for sure.

 

[PCHawk]

+1

If he could give up an ounce of his pride and admit he might have a chance at redeeming what’s left of his career. I honestly think he believes that nothing he did could’ve been perceived as racially biased, and if that’s what he really believes he’s not going to admit it.

At this point I’m over it. He’s sleeping in the bed he made and both he and Iowa seem to have both moved on. It’s not something that’s keeping me up at night for sure.

It's probably not that he thinks nothing he said could've been percieved as racist and more that he doesn't think he bares responsibility for how people perceive him.

My main issue with him is one of the players who respected him (can't remember who) said it was the best when you make a big play, look over at Doyle, and see a small grin of satisfaction on his face. If you're going to be that big of an asshole, at least do a better job of praising players when they do good. Fran can be an asshole too and his players almost universally love him because he shows them love too. Seems like Doyle was all asshole and no love.

 

[#1DieHardHawk]

I appreciate everyone else's comments.

I would just add that one thing that this does show is that if you are a general asshole to those around you, that tends to come back and bite you in the ass. Whether you want to call that Karma or Zen or whatever. The golden rule applies. When you treat others like shit, you might get wrongfully accused of being a racist, or a bully, or sexist, or bad at your job, or a host of other things that separates you from your job. If you treat your employees, or in this case, student athletes, with dignity and respect, the odds of someone accusing you of wrongdoing drop dramatically.

I don't know whether he was racist or not, but in a sport made up of majority black athletes, being a universal jerk may lead to the perception from some minority players that his jerkiness had a racial component. Once that is put out there, its hard to put back in the bottle these days.

I have zero sympathy for this guy. Be a better human and this never would have happened. Same for guys like Bobby Knight. That sort of asshole could, unfortunately, exist in high school and college in the 80s and 90s. Times have changed. For the better.

This is exactly right (though I'm not sure I entirely agree with your last sentence...).

The old-school abusive types have been weeded out, in both sports and other vocations where that kind of behavior was rewarded, and that is definitely for the better.

Where I give pause, is that in this day and age of "micro-aggressions" and the power and convenience of pulling out a "****-phobic" card when all else fails, perception has become more relevant/important than fact. That is a scary reality that can ruin peoples lives.

 

[SwirlinLingerie]

I also think Murphy left a lot on the table. These are difficult interviews/conversations, and neither one jumped into the critical nuances of the situation. It seems like Murphy was only able to go as far as asking Doyle if he ever used the N word. That feels like a very stereotypical, "white" way to define racism. It left Doyle a path out of a more complicated conversation by denying he ever used the word and then pivoting to talking points around empathy and old school coaching methods.

In my opinion, Murphy needed to probe on the Husch Blackwell report. That was an independent evaluation that found the program guilty of racial bias after interviews with players AND coaches. I was interested to hear reflection from Doyle on that. What was his take? Does he think he and Kirk contributed to that situation? Upon time and distance, does he agree with the assessment? Did he ever talk about racial issues with Iowa's black coaches? Why does he think Iowa's graduation rate and leadership group involvement was so much lower for black players? Did he ever think about that at the time or find it problematic? Was it something the coaching staff talked about?

 

[Fryowa]

I also think Murphy left a lot on the table. These are difficult interviews/conversations, and neither one jumped into the critical nuances of the situation. It seems like Murphy was only able to go as far as asking Doyle if he ever used the N word. That feels like a very stereotypical, "white" way to define racism. It left Doyle a path out of a more complicated conversation by denying he ever used the word and then pivoting to talking points around empathy and old school coaching methods.

In my opinion, Murphy needed to probe on the Husch Blackwell report. That was an independent evaluation that found the program guilty of racial bias after interviews with players AND coaches. I was interested to hear reflection from Doyle on that. What was his take? Does he think he and Kirk contributed to that situation? Upon time and distance, does he agree with the assessment? Did he ever talk about racial issues with Iowa's black coaches? Why does he think Iowa's graduation rate and leadership group involvement was so much lower for black players? Did he ever think about that at the time or find it problematic? Was it something the coaching staff talked about?

This. The interviewer focused 95% of the questions on the general asshole part of him rather than the race stuff. I fee; very confident that if his only fault was being to hard on people he'd still be employed here. They totally ducked the disparity between white and black players' viewpoints, team attrition, and graduation rates.

I love how Murphy went to great lengths to say how the interview wasn't screened or conditional, and then proceeded to softball the whole thing.

I do understand you have to be somewhat careful otherwise the interviewee is just going to cut it off and walk away, but the other side is that the whole reason for the interviewee even being there in the first place is because some pretty serious stuff took place, and his reaction to tough questions speaks more than just the answers (or lack thereof) themselves. If those questions you listed got asked, it would probably have been a waste of time because he'd just repeat the same vague answers over and over again.