InGoodCo
Well-Known Member
Good lord this is even worse. You apparently don't know much about football.
And your last question doesn't make any logical sense. Stanzi wasn't ultra conservative in 2010. Taking 2009 Stanzi means you better take the 2009 defense because with a mediocre defense that team is probably only winning 6-7 games.
haha - exactly - why is that so hard to understand? The 10 defense was a shell of the 09 - and in fact, probably allowed the coaches to be a little more aggressive in play calling with Stanzi because they could rely on them getting the stops. Each year and pieces of the puzzle are different. Not a hard concept. - legit arguments can be made for both sides of the coin, but no one is "destroying" anything unless it's TK hitting a porta potty.