ProfessorHawk
Active Member
Hello again, fellow Hawkeyes. I just had another tome to share. My wife kicked me off the desktop, and the security features I have running on my laptop prevent standard formatting. So protest not, for Res ipsa loquitur. It matters how we win. And I cannot even now, very now, shut off the Italics. My laptop sucks extremely and I will never buy Toshiba again or Windows 8. But it does matter how we win. Still can't turn the Italics off. Hitting return accomplishes nothing, so STFU a priori. Winning at all costs is the sort of emotional and amoral perspective of people who invade media offices and gun down journalists., just to grab a bit of media currency. If there is no other metric beyond wins and losses, we automatically reduce ourselves. Michigan will discover whether their insanely high-stakes gambit unfolds the way their theoretical strategy sessions suggest they should. Theory is often gregarious, in that it rarely produces outcomes that fall within the narrow outcomes predicted by shallow theorizing and often fails to produce at all. Theory can also bite in unintentional manners, whereby things we didn't foresee nonetheless emerge to confound our expectations. Kirk is not a failed man, or, at least, not a failed coach by most standard metrics unique to his profession. I wanna win as much or more than all of you, but I recognize that the manner in which we win or lose defines us. Methodology matters because it reveals who we are, what assumptions we make, and how we view reality. I'm quite certain Kirk Ferentz views the financial reality of Iowa Football quite accurately. This is also his legacy. We should be very cautious and not assume getting Pro Combat gear and throwing caution to the wind will elicit the results expected. Sometimes, the apple falls on our head, and we are faced with explaining why. Other times, the apple fails to fall, and we are still faced with providing explanations. Kirk has to provide explanations, not us. I recommend patience and, even, leniency in judgment. What if the stakes are greater than we know?