MoseSchrute
Well-Known Member
Scheme changes may do these teams good - College Football - Rivals.com
Three teams on the list affect us.
Three teams on the list affect us.
Last edited:
My opinion on this, is the facts. Go Pro, or stay home. Playing that type of ball belongs in HS. No team that matters runs that kind of O, the ones that do have little talent and rely way to much on it to have sustained sucess and when they do run that kind of O, they get exposed. Missery, Mich, Northwestern, and the list goes on and on (did'nt Oregon lose?) Infact has Oregon EVER won a NC in football (thats what you should be asking yourself)? Yes as a coach it would be easy to keep your job because you can have a good year now and again and almost always break the 500 mark, but face it that's middle of the pack.
My opinion on this, is the facts. Go Pro, or stay home. Playing that type of ball belongs in HS. No team that matters runs that kind of O, the ones that do have little talent and rely way to much on it to have sustained sucess and when they do run that kind of O, they get exposed. Missery, Mich, Northwestern, and the list goes on and on (did'nt Oregon lose?) Infact has Oregon EVER won a NC in football (thats what you should be asking yourself)? Yes as a coach it would be easy to keep your job because you can have a good year now and again and almost always break the 500 mark, but face it that's middle of the pack.
Missouri has had one of it's best runs in school history the last 6-7 years.... NW has too. Oregon has been very, very good the last few years and they lost to the spread of all spread offenses Auburn... who has easily the best OC in the nation.
Indiana and NW do not beat Iowa if they run a pro style offense. It levels the playing field by taking advantage of stubbornness.
Most certainly. Norm Parker is a great d-coordinator, but he's got an Achilles heal... always has.
What would you rather have a Norm Parker defense facing? A Penn State, Wisconsin, and/or Glen Mason pro style Power I offense or a Northwestern, Ohio State (Smith/Pryor era), Purdue, Indiana, Iowa State, even UNI spread offense.
Anytime we face a spread offense with decent personal they can give us fits. Not only through the air, but also on the ground. Not always... but certainly more than power I pro style.
Missouri has had one of it's best runs in school history the last 6-7 years.... NW has too. Oregon has been very, very good the last few years and they lost to the spread of all spread offenses Auburn... who has easily the best OC in the nation.
Indiana and NW do not beat Iowa if they run a pro style offense. It levels the playing field by taking advantage of stubbornness.
The teams you mentioned scored 21, 20, 17, 17, 7 & 16 points in their last meeting vs Iowa.
That's an average of 14.7pt/gm, 4 of which Iowa won.
The problems that Iowa has are rarely defense related.
I think its a common belief that Iowa fares better against the PSU's & Wisconsin type offenses but I don't know that the numbers really support it.
With that said, I too wish Iowa would be a little more multiple on defense.
But I'll take what Norm delivers almost every year.
And we beat Missouri, NW , face it they have our number, but are not going to get anywhere (as their conf record shows), Oregon is riding the talent from a few good "gets". The Sec is more balanced then any of those, (but with the B10 knocking on their door). Why do you think they call it PRO set? The NFL has so much money and has been doing it long enough, they know what works and what does'nt.
Yeah hows that work out for teams/programs?I think you mean a few good BUYS.
Infatuation with the spread is a joke. Nebby doesn't run a spread...they run the ball. Can anyone define a spread? Or is it just anytime an offense puts up a lot of points?
What I define a spread as isInfatuation with the spread is a joke. Nebby doesn't run a spread...they run the ball. Can anyone define a spread? Or is it just anytime an offense puts up a lot of points?
They know better than to risk their expensive qb's in a gimmicky offense.Why do you think they call it PRO set? The NFL has so much money and has been doing it long enough, they know what works and what does'nt.
Helping you out here, SO the next question is, baby steps here. And why do they not want to risk that ARM?They know better than to risk their expensive qb's in a gimmicky offense.
My opinion on this, is the facts.
Playing that type of ball belongs in HS. No team that matters runs that kind of O, the ones that do have little talent and rely way to much on it to have sustained sucess and when they do run that kind of O, they get exposed. Missery, Mich, Northwestern, and the list goes on and on (did'nt Oregon lose?)
Auburn ran the spread.
Florida, Auburn, and partially Texas would disagree with you.
What I define a spread as is
A. You have no one in the back field, but the qb
B. You rely on a qb who is qwick and decides to run it, leaving him on the sidelines for atleast part of the season. Persa, T-mart again the list goes on and on.
I would help you out, but as a fan of the Hawks I can not. Look at how Missery lined up to us in our bowl (have you seen it?). If you cared to watch the game, the announcer says "misserys RB is RB by vote of the team members".O RLY?
What about these responses?
Then by your definition no team in college football runs the spread, that I can think of. All teams use spread FORMATIONS, but I'm almost sure that every team in Div 1A lists at least a RB in their starting lineup...I'm struggling to come up with a team that uses Empty as their base formation.