Iowalaw's Post-Game Analysis: Penn State

IowaLawWasRight

Well-Known Member
Two evenly matched ranked opponents slugging it out in the rain. The team with the injured, but competent QB rightfully beat the team whose Leave it to Beaver QB completed just 36% of his passes. Sadly, the Hawks keep having opportunities to make their mark, and won't take things to the next level. Are they good enough? Probably. Are their players/coaches clutch in close games? Not even close!

1. Stanley - welp, they say IowalawWasRight about Stanley, and I tend to agree. 18-49 for 200 yards, 2 ints, 0 tds, and multiple fumbled snaps where he was off in la la land when the ball was hiked right to him. The interceptions were the worst possible variety. One was basically a pick 6. The other was an inexcusable choke job from Penn State's 3 yardline with less than 3 minutes to play, down by 6. Why we weren't running the ball and milking the clock in that situation? Who knows. An intentional grounding call when he was standing in the pocket with no defender within 20 feet of him? I have never seen something so boneheaded. This was Stanley's second straight regression back to the mean of mediocrity (see last week's Iowalaw report for more info). His 4th laid egg of the season, to go along with 2 or 3 good games. Poor decision making, poor mechanics, poor clock management, zero cool under fire, and a slew of absolutely awful throws. Brian Griece chimed in and noted to the national television audience that Stanley was missing on middle school throws. His passes did not discriminate, as some were thrown hard and into the dirt at his targets feet, while others sailed a mile above his wide open receiver's hands. Perhaps even more frustrating was his general lack of being a gamer in the clutch. He just looked dazed and confused out there randying around with a high look on his face after badly misthrown incomplete passes. Football is a team sport, but wow.

2. Sargent - It looks like we found a gamer in the bunch! 16 rushes for 91 yards (5.7 ypc) and 15 more yrds receiving. I saw glimpses of Wadley in Sargent, and it's time that he starts seeing more playing time. Having watched every game this year, it seems like Sargent has been hindered by bad luck, where a good portion of his carries have started with getting hit immediately after taking the hand off. Once the guy gets a head of steam, he's extremely fast and hard to bring down. Cheers to at least one skill player coming to play today.

3. Raestatter - I don't normally waste any time highlighting a punter, but what a let down Colten was today. In games when it doesn't matter, he boots them far and uncatchable. While he has never had much of a leg, he has built a pretty good punting average on the fact that his kicks roll 25 yards and are not returned. Today, it was the opposite. His punts were short line drives right to the return man. I hate to say it, but he looked like a high schooler out there, with 7 punts for 36.9 yrd avg and zero hang time. In a 6 point game, that field position can be the difference between winning and losing.

4. Tight Ends - despite disappearing for 75% of the game, the tight ends came up big for the Hawks. TJ with 3 catches for 63 yards (and robbed out of a potentially game winning catch) while Fant had 5 catches for 56. Fant still strikes me as a "me first" kind of player, but it's nice having him on our team. If Fant had been involved in more than just the 4th quarter, the outcome would have been different.

5. Smith Marsette - Ok, so IowalawWasRight, the guy can't catch the ball. This was the 7th game of his career where he had more drops than catches and 280lb DL Sam Brinks likely has better hands. But once he gets the ball, he's electrifying. 3 kick returns for 103 yards, and a couple nice jet sweeps/reverses where he made something out of nothing. It is absolutely imperative that the staff figures out a way to put the ball in his hands throughout the game. Run the wildcat. Run 3-5 jet sweeps per game. Do something, because he's not going to be a difference making receiver this year but he's too good to keep off the field.

6. Stone - The only real feel good story out of today was watching Geno Stone come back to the school that spurned him, and sticking it to them. While our defense has had better days, Stone came up huge with a fantastic pick 6 that gave the Hawks a chance of winning right down to the end. Stone desperately wanted to go to Penn State, and went on 7 unofficial visits there as a high school student, but his scholarship offer never came. Good for him for making them pay.

7. LBs - Our interchangeable make-shift LBs, who were quietly having a solid season despite having no true leader or star back there. Today, they were exploited for being the lightly recruited, inexperienced bunch that they are. Jack Hockaday led the LBs with just 4 tackles, Welch at 3, and Colbert had 2. I think it's time for Hooker to permanently take a seat at the LB table, because we just don't have any talent at the position. Amani Jones didn't see the field again today, as he is clearly in Kirk's dog house. VERY strange that Jones could go from starter to bench warmer after just 3 series in 1 game, yet Stanley can make boneheaded play after boneheaded play time after time and the coach keeps throwing him back out there without even considering playing his backup. Not sure how that works.
 
Last edited:
8. Recinos - Let's not leave out Recinos, who has come on in recent weeks and is quietly putting together a solid season at kicker. While it would have been nice if his kicks went into the endzone rather than giving their studs a chance to run them back, his field goals in the rain were on point. 2/2 with a long of 49 yards in a tight game. That's Kaeding caliber of clutch kicking. Miguel will be missed next year.

9. Questionable Coaching - For the 20th year under Ferentz, clock management before halftime and questionable decisions plagued us. While I commend the creativity and aggressiveness we have seen this year, what the @#@! was staff thinking with 45 seconds until halftime from Penn State's 42 yard line on 4th and 10, in the pouring rain, and...suddenly putting Mansell in there for his first snap of the day on a called pass to Stanley? What are the odds of success for us gaining at least 10 yards??? Slim to none? The play botches, Penn State scores 3, and at the end of the game, Iowa needs a touchdown to win rather than a field goal to tie. It was the difference in the game. The called pass from Penn State's 3 yardline with 3 min to play is another inexcusable blunder. Even the miracle punter pass to the DL with the 1 in a million catch (one that our top 2 WRs would have dropped) was a terrible call with a very low chance of success.
 
I thought about the NS/AJ comparison last night. I came to the conclusion that there really isn’t much difference other than AJ is a little more emotional and very demonstrative with those emotions.

What hurts AJ’s playing time is there are viable replacements. With NS it just shows you Mansell/Petras are not really close to being ready for immediate playing time.
 
#9, #9, #9.... I had hope after what I consider the best clock management of the KF era last week. The use of T/Os was remarkable in the strategic sense considering the wind conditions. Yesterday? 1st and goal. 3 minutes. 3 yards. 3 timeouts. 4 downs. Should have just given the ball to Sargent on 1 and 2. If 1 didn't work should have called two plays in the huddle for second and tried tempo for the 3rd down attempt if required. This would have forced PSU to take a T/O. I really think they would have scored and left about 2:15 on the clock and PSU w/ one, maybe two, timeouts. Instead I was traumatized by what I saw.

As for Raestatter - I'll cut him a little more slack. He had one very poor punt. Had three inside the 20 and, on a day when the ball was slippery, no safeties and no blocks. The bonus TD was a risky call but it paid off. Maybe Brinks should move to TE...

If Stanley doesn't get his head back in the game the Hawks will loose two or three more games. Remember - Every QB of the KF era, for a variety of reasons, had the most wins the year he earned the starting spot outright. I hope history doesn't repeat itself.
 
The Stone pick six reminded me a bit of Micah Hyde in the Insight Bowl, only Hyde's was longer.

While we have three competent RB's, no one has broke one for a big gainer, taken one 65 yards to the house, etc. It's coming. We have been close. Maybe if we can catch a tired defense late the game it will happen. I thought Indiana was ripe for it.
 
The Stone pick six reminded me a bit of Micah Hyde in the Insight Bowl, only Hyde's was longer.

While we have three competent RB's, no one has broke one for a big gainer, taken one 65 yards to the house, etc. It's coming. We have been close. Maybe if we can catch a tired defense late the game it will happen. I thought Indiana was ripe for it.
Because none of our backs have game breaking speed. Sure could use Higdon, or maybe Eno Benjamin who is tearing it up at ASU.
 
Two evenly matched ranked opponents slugging it out in the rain. The team with the injured, but competent QB rightfully beat the team whose Leave it to Beaver QB completed just 36% of his passes. Sadly, the Hawks keep having opportunities to make their mark, and won't take things to the next level. Are they good enough? Probably. Are their players/coaches clutch in close games? Not even close!

1. Stanley - welp, they say IowalawWasRight about Stanley, and I tend to agree. 18-49 for 200 yards, 2 ints, 0 tds, and multiple fumbled snaps where he was off in la la land when the ball was hiked right to him. The interceptions were the worst possible variety. One was basically a pick 6. The other was an inexcusable choke job from Penn State's 3 yardline with less than 3 minutes to play, down by 6. Why we weren't running the ball and milking the clock in that situation? Who knows. An intentional grounding call when he was standing in the pocket with no defender within 20 feet of him? I have never seen something so boneheaded. This was Stanley's second straight regression back to the mean of mediocrity (see last week's Iowalaw report for more info). His 4th laid egg of the season, to go along with 2 or 3 good games. Poor decision making, poor mechanics, poor clock management, zero cool under fire, and a slew of absolutely awful throws. Brian Griece chimed in and noted to the national television audience that Stanley was missing on middle school throws. His passes did not discriminate, as some were thrown hard and into the dirt at his targets feet, while others sailed a mile above his wide open receiver's hands. Perhaps even more frustrating was his general lack of being a gamer in the clutch. He just looked dazed and confused out there randying around with a high look on his face after badly misthrown incomplete passes. Football is a team sport, but wow.

2. Sargent - It looks like we found a gamer in the bunch! 16 rushes for 91 yards (5.7 ypc) and 15 more yrds receiving. I saw glimpses of Wadley in Sargent, and it's time that he starts seeing more playing time. Having watched every game this year, it seems like Sargent has been hindered by bad luck, where a good portion of his carries have started with getting hit immediately after taking the hand off. Once the guy gets a head of steam, he's extremely fast and hard to bring down. Cheers to at least one skill player coming to play today.

3. Raestatter - I don't normally waste any time highlighting a punter, but what a let down Colten was today. In games when it doesn't matter, he boots them far and uncatchable. While he has never had much of a leg, he has built a pretty good punting average on the fact that his kicks roll 25 yards and are not returned. Today, it was the opposite. His punts were short line drives right to the return man. I hate to say it, but he looked like a high schooler out there, with 7 punts for 36.9 yrd avg and zero hang time. In a 6 point game, that field position can be the difference between winning and losing.

4. Tight Ends - despite disappearing for 75% of the game, the tight ends came up big for the Hawks. TJ with 3 catches for 63 yards (and robbed out of a potentially game winning catch) while Fant had 5 catches for 56. Fant still strikes me as a "me first" kind of player, but it's nice having him on our team. If Fant had been involved in more than just the 4th quarter, the outcome would have been different.

5. Smith Marsette - Ok, so IowalawWasRight, the guy can't catch the ball. This was the 7th game of his career where he had more drops than catches and 280lb DL Sam Brinks likely has better hands. But once he gets the ball, he's electrifying. 3 kick returns for 103 yards, and a couple nice jet sweeps/reverses where he made something out of nothing. It is absolutely imperative that the staff figures out a way to put the ball in his hands throughout the game. Run the wildcat. Run 3-5 jet sweeps per game. Do something, because he's not going to be a difference making receiver this year but he's too good to keep off the field.

6. Stone - The only real feel good story out of today was watching Geno Stone come back to the school that spurned him, and sticking it to them. While our defense has had better days, Stone came up huge with a fantastic pick 6 that gave the Hawks a chance of winning right down to the end. Stone desperately wanted to go to Penn State, and went on 7 unofficial visits there as a high school student, but his scholarship offer never came. Good for him for making them pay.

7. LBs - Our interchangeable make-shift LBs, who were quietly having a solid season despite having no true leader or star back there. Today, they were exploited for being the lightly recruited, inexperienced bunch that they are. Jack Hockaday led the LBs with just 4 tackles, Welch at 3, and Colbert had 2. I think it's time for Hooker to permanently take a seat at the LB table, because we just don't have any talent at the position. Amani Jones didn't see the field again today, as he is clearly in Kirk's dog house. VERY strange that Jones could go from starter to bench warmer after just 3 series in 1 game, yet Stanley can make boneheaded play after boneheaded play time after time and the coach keeps throwing him back out there without even considering playing his backup. Not sure how that works.

Stanley deserves the criticism given this week. While you have been hard on him a few times this year it's hard to deny that the kid is going out there and making you look like Nostradamus.

Other analysis mostly aligns with my own yet overly bombastic in some of the commentary.

1 objection is Smith Marsette. I agree he is electric. I do not agree that we write him off as a pass catching threat. Watched Julio Jones have 3 drops the other week. Probably time to sit him. While we don't disagree the production as a WR is lacking we disagree on why. You say can't catch. I say can't get any targets. Our WR's are so starved for targets from the anemic offense of last year and some games of this year that they are literally seeing the ball come and thinking "please God let me catch this, it might be the only throw I get today". It's a head game now. Both Smith's have the size, speed, and catching ability to be difference makers. They don't know what that really even means yet. We gotta get them more targets plain and simple.
 
I hope you are not comparing Smith Marsette with Julio Jones! lol If Julio has 3 drops in a game, he is given the benefit of the doubt because he has had dozens of 10+ catch games and has proven himself time and time again. The drops would be an anomaly, not the norm. With Smith-Marsette, it is no exaggeration when IowaLaw says he has had 7 games where he actually dropped more passes than he caught. That stat is unheard of at any level, let alone the Big 10 on a top 25 team.

The reason Iowa's WRs are starved for targets is that Stanley is not a confident QB and throws the high percentage throws to the guys who get open, mainly TEs. Smith-Marsette does not even try to get open half the time, and the proof was in the pudding against Penn State where throws went his way and he made no effort to go after the ball and get it.

Again, I'm not giving up on the guy as a WR, but he is not ready for prime time. Let's spoon feed the kid and hand him the ball so he does not have to get open and make a catch. He didn't have hands last year. He doesn't have them this year. It's not going to miraculously happen tomorrow simply by playing catch in practice.


Stanley deserves the criticism given this week. While you have been hard on him a few times this year it's hard to deny that the kid is going out there and making you look like Nostradamus.

Other analysis mostly aligns with my own yet overly bombastic in some of the commentary.

1 objection is Smith Marsette. I agree he is electric. I do not agree that we write him off as a pass catching threat. Watched Julio Jones have 3 drops the other week. Probably time to sit him. While we don't disagree the production as a WR is lacking we disagree on why. You say can't catch. I say can't get any targets. Our WR's are so starved for targets from the anemic offense of last year and some games of this year that they are literally seeing the ball come and thinking "please God let me catch this, it might be the only throw I get today". It's a head game now. Both Smith's have the size, speed, and catching ability to be difference makers. They don't know what that really even means yet. We gotta get them more targets plain and simple.
 
Stanley deserves the criticism given this week. While you have been hard on him a few times this year it's hard to deny that the kid is going out there and making you look like Nostradamus.

Other analysis mostly aligns with my own yet overly bombastic in some of the commentary.

1 objection is Smith Marsette. I agree he is electric. I do not agree that we write him off as a pass catching threat. Watched Julio Jones have 3 drops the other week. Probably time to sit him. While we don't disagree the production as a WR is lacking we disagree on why. You say can't catch. I say can't get any targets. Our WR's are so starved for targets from the anemic offense of last year and some games of this year that they are literally seeing the ball come and thinking "please God let me catch this, it might be the only throw I get today". It's a head game now. Both Smith's have the size, speed, and catching ability to be difference makers. They don't know what that really even means yet. We gotta get them more targets plain and simple.

He's Nostradamus in a broken clock sort of way. Trace McSorely was 11-25 with a pick 6 and most of his WRs look like they belong in the NFL but maybe he sucks to. Fant didn't even play a lot until the 4ht quarter. You'd think he'd be a better target for Stanley than multiple undersized WRs.
 
Two evenly matched ranked opponents slugging it out in the rain. The team with the injured, but competent QB rightfully beat the team whose Leave it to Beaver QB completed just 36% of his passes. Sadly, the Hawks keep having opportunities to make their mark, and won't take things to the next level. Are they good enough? Probably. Are their players/coaches clutch in close games? Not even close!

1. Stanley - welp, they say IowalawWasRight about Stanley, and I tend to agree. 18-49 for 200 yards, 2 ints, 0 tds, and multiple fumbled snaps where he was off in la la land when the ball was hiked right to him. The interceptions were the worst possible variety. One was basically a pick 6. The other was an inexcusable choke job from Penn State's 3 yardline with less than 3 minutes to play, down by 6. Why we weren't running the ball and milking the clock in that situation? Who knows. An intentional grounding call when he was standing in the pocket with no defender within 20 feet of him? I have never seen something so boneheaded. This was Stanley's second straight regression back to the mean of mediocrity (see last week's Iowalaw report for more info). His 4th laid egg of the season, to go along with 2 or 3 good games. Poor decision making, poor mechanics, poor clock management, zero cool under fire, and a slew of absolutely awful throws. Brian Griece chimed in and noted to the national television audience that Stanley was missing on middle school throws. His passes did not discriminate, as some were thrown hard and into the dirt at his targets feet, while others sailed a mile above his wide open receiver's hands. Perhaps even more frustrating was his general lack of being a gamer in the clutch. He just looked dazed and confused out there randying around with a high look on his face after badly misthrown incomplete passes. Football is a team sport, but wow.

2. Sargent - It looks like we found a gamer in the bunch! 16 rushes for 91 yards (5.7 ypc) and 15 more yrds receiving. I saw glimpses of Wadley in Sargent, and it's time that he starts seeing more playing time. Having watched every game this year, it seems like Sargent has been hindered by bad luck, where a good portion of his carries have started with getting hit immediately after taking the hand off. Once the guy gets a head of steam, he's extremely fast and hard to bring down. Cheers to at least one skill player coming to play today.

3. Raestatter - I don't normally waste any time highlighting a punter, but what a let down Colten was today. In games when it doesn't matter, he boots them far and uncatchable. While he has never had much of a leg, he has built a pretty good punting average on the fact that his kicks roll 25 yards and are not returned. Today, it was the opposite. His punts were short line drives right to the return man. I hate to say it, but he looked like a high schooler out there, with 7 punts for 36.9 yrd avg and zero hang time. In a 6 point game, that field position can be the difference between winning and losing.

4. Tight Ends - despite disappearing for 75% of the game, the tight ends came up big for the Hawks. TJ with 3 catches for 63 yards (and robbed out of a potentially game winning catch) while Fant had 5 catches for 56. Fant still strikes me as a "me first" kind of player, but it's nice having him on our team. If Fant had been involved in more than just the 4th quarter, the outcome would have been different.

5. Smith Marsette - Ok, so IowalawWasRight, the guy can't catch the ball. This was the 7th game of his career where he had more drops than catches and 280lb DL Sam Brinks likely has better hands. But once he gets the ball, he's electrifying. 3 kick returns for 103 yards, and a couple nice jet sweeps/reverses where he made something out of nothing. It is absolutely imperative that the staff figures out a way to put the ball in his hands throughout the game. Run the wildcat. Run 3-5 jet sweeps per game. Do something, because he's not going to be a difference making receiver this year but he's too good to keep off the field.

6. Stone - The only real feel good story out of today was watching Geno Stone come back to the school that spurned him, and sticking it to them. While our defense has had better days, Stone came up huge with a fantastic pick 6 that gave the Hawks a chance of winning right down to the end. Stone desperately wanted to go to Penn State, and went on 7 unofficial visits there as a high school student, but his scholarship offer never came. Good for him for making them pay.

7. LBs - Our interchangeable make-shift LBs, who were quietly having a solid season despite having no true leader or star back there. Today, they were exploited for being the lightly recruited, inexperienced bunch that they are. Jack Hockaday led the LBs with just 4 tackles, Welch at 3, and Colbert had 2. I think it's time for Hooker to permanently take a seat at the LB table, because we just don't have any talent at the position. Amani Jones didn't see the field again today, as he is clearly in Kirk's dog house. VERY strange that Jones could go from starter to bench warmer after just 3 series in 1 game, yet Stanley can make boneheaded play after boneheaded play time after time and the coach keeps throwing him back out there without even considering playing his backup. Not sure how that works.
Your criticism of Stanley is fair and I've heard folks bash him more and probably rightfully so. His missing TJH was about as inexcusable of a play as I've ever seen. There's no telling how that game plays out if we get that easy long TD. You don't have to make the perfect pass on that. Just hit him so he doesn't have to fall to the ground to catch it. Ugh.
But as far as wondering why he wasn't yanked as opposed to Jones like he was it's just the position in which they play. I'm sure in Jones case it's also how he's done in practice and how the others have played. We haven't had poor LB play this year. There's been less LBs on WRs this year than other years (only one case that I remember earlier this year with Nieman getting beat by one for a TD) Having Hooker in the box with a 3 safeties look has helped alleviate that. Yanking QBs is a different animal as we all know. I'm not saying he shouldn't have been because at about 4 or 5 different times in that game I said outloud I'd seen enough of Stanley. But it's just tougher for coaches and teams to do. Once you squeeze that toothpaste out good luck getting it back in
 
The Stone pick six reminded me a bit of Micah Hyde in the Insight Bowl, only Hyde's was longer.

While we have three competent RB's, no one has broke one for a big gainer, taken one 65 yards to the house, etc. It's coming. We have been close. Maybe if we can catch a tired defense late the game it will happen. I thought Indiana was ripe for it.

Or maybe if we let ONE RB get into a rhythm. And WTF will it take for Toren Young to get a "real" start?!
 
Or maybe if we let ONE RB get into a rhythm. And WTF will it take for Toren Young to get a "real" start?!
Here's a name you might remember. Blake Ezor. Lorenzo White's successor at Michigan State. 5'9" 190 lbs. And Perles rode him like Man O War. 30, 35, 40 carries a game. One of my favorite Big Ten players.

Those days are gone. Not even Shonn Greene got that kind of usage. Not game after game.

We had a pretty good three headed monster in 2015 at RB but one of them was usually dinged up at any given moment. IKM has battled some ankle problems but yes, it would be cool to see one of them get fed heavily and often. Like Canzeri 2015 Illinois.
 
Two evenly matched ranked opponents slugging it out in the rain. The team with the injured, but competent QB rightfully beat the team whose Leave it to Beaver QB completed just 36% of his passes. Sadly, the Hawks keep having opportunities to make their mark, and won't take things to the next level. Are they good enough? Probably. Are their players/coaches clutch in close games? Not even close!

1. Stanley - welp, they say IowalawWasRight about Stanley, and I tend to agree. 18-49 for 200 yards, 2 ints, 0 tds, and multiple fumbled snaps where he was off in la la land when the ball was hiked right to him. The interceptions were the worst possible variety. One was basically a pick 6. The other was an inexcusable choke job from Penn State's 3 yardline with less than 3 minutes to play, down by 6. Why we weren't running the ball and milking the clock in that situation? Who knows. An intentional grounding call when he was standing in the pocket with no defender within 20 feet of him? I have never seen something so boneheaded. This was Stanley's second straight regression back to the mean of mediocrity (see last week's Iowalaw report for more info). His 4th laid egg of the season, to go along with 2 or 3 good games. Poor decision making, poor mechanics, poor clock management, zero cool under fire, and a slew of absolutely awful throws. Brian Griece chimed in and noted to the national television audience that Stanley was missing on middle school throws. His passes did not discriminate, as some were thrown hard and into the dirt at his targets feet, while others sailed a mile above his wide open receiver's hands. Perhaps even more frustrating was his general lack of being a gamer in the clutch. He just looked dazed and confused out there randying around with a high look on his face after badly misthrown incomplete passes. Football is a team sport, but wow.

2. Sargent - It looks like we found a gamer in the bunch! 16 rushes for 91 yards (5.7 ypc) and 15 more yrds receiving. I saw glimpses of Wadley in Sargent, and it's time that he starts seeing more playing time. Having watched every game this year, it seems like Sargent has been hindered by bad luck, where a good portion of his carries have started with getting hit immediately after taking the hand off. Once the guy gets a head of steam, he's extremely fast and hard to bring down. Cheers to at least one skill player coming to play today.

3. Raestatter - I don't normally waste any time highlighting a punter, but what a let down Colten was today. In games when it doesn't matter, he boots them far and uncatchable. While he has never had much of a leg, he has built a pretty good punting average on the fact that his kicks roll 25 yards and are not returned. Today, it was the opposite. His punts were short line drives right to the return man. I hate to say it, but he looked like a high schooler out there, with 7 punts for 36.9 yrd avg and zero hang time. In a 6 point game, that field position can be the difference between winning and losing.

4. Tight Ends - despite disappearing for 75% of the game, the tight ends came up big for the Hawks. TJ with 3 catches for 63 yards (and robbed out of a potentially game winning catch) while Fant had 5 catches for 56. Fant still strikes me as a "me first" kind of player, but it's nice having him on our team. If Fant had been involved in more than just the 4th quarter, the outcome would have been different.

5. Smith Marsette - Ok, so IowalawWasRight, the guy can't catch the ball. This was the 7th game of his career where he had more drops than catches and 280lb DL Sam Brinks likely has better hands. But once he gets the ball, he's electrifying. 3 kick returns for 103 yards, and a couple nice jet sweeps/reverses where he made something out of nothing. It is absolutely imperative that the staff figures out a way to put the ball in his hands throughout the game. Run the wildcat. Run 3-5 jet sweeps per game. Do something, because he's not going to be a difference making receiver this year but he's too good to keep off the field.

6. Stone - The only real feel good story out of today was watching Geno Stone come back to the school that spurned him, and sticking it to them. While our defense has had better days, Stone came up huge with a fantastic pick 6 that gave the Hawks a chance of winning right down to the end. Stone desperately wanted to go to Penn State, and went on 7 unofficial visits there as a high school student, but his scholarship offer never came. Good for him for making them pay.

7. LBs - Our interchangeable make-shift LBs, who were quietly having a solid season despite having no true leader or star back there. Today, they were exploited for being the lightly recruited, inexperienced bunch that they are. Jack Hockaday led the LBs with just 4 tackles, Welch at 3, and Colbert had 2. I think it's time for Hooker to permanently take a seat at the LB table, because we just don't have any talent at the position. Amani Jones didn't see the field again today, as he is clearly in Kirk's dog house. VERY strange that Jones could go from starter to bench warmer after just 3 series in 1 game, yet Stanley can make boneheaded play after boneheaded play time after time and the coach keeps throwing him back out there without even considering playing his backup. Not sure how that works.
Here's what it all comes down to in one sentence: You can't hide your quarterback.
 
You sound like a clown comparing Stanley's day to McSorley's. lol Stanley is a pro style statute who's only job is to sit back and throw the ball. McSorley is a dual threat QB who led Penn State in rushing, averaging 6 yards per carry, despite being knocked out of the game with a gimpy knee. He threw a nice td pass and ran for another. Stanley, on the other hand, finished the game with a QB rating of 13.2, -7 rushing yards and 2 ints.

At the end of the day, McSorley has proven to step up in big games. Stanley struggles mightily under pressure.

He's Nostradamus in a broken clock sort of way. Trace McSorely was 11-25 with a pick 6 and most of his WRs look like they belong in the NFL but maybe he sucks to. Fant didn't even play a lot until the 4ht quarter. You'd think he'd be a better target for Stanley than multiple undersized WRs.
 
You sound like a clown comparing Stanley's day to McSorley's. lol Stanley is a pro style statute who's only job is to sit back and throw the ball. McSorley is a dual threat QB who led Penn State in rushing, averaging 6 yards per carry, despite being knocked out of the game with a gimpy knee. He threw a nice td pass and ran for another. Stanley, on the other hand, finished the game with a QB rating of 13.2, -7 rushing yards and 2 ints.

At the end of the day, McSorley has proven to step up in big games. Stanley struggles mightily under pressure.
Obviously the conditions favored a dual threat QB genius. It's no wonder the Vegas spread went in PSUs favor when the weather report came out. The fact remains McSorely was throwing poorly to and he has NFL WR's, not multiple 5'8" guys. McSorely stepped up and threw a pick 6 in clutch time, lmao.
 
Last edited:
You really think Penn State was favored to win because of the rain, and not because they have been a top 10 team most of the year and are thought of as the better team?

Did you watch the game? Stanley was not throwing to "multiple 5'8 guys." Virtually all of his passes were to 6'5 future NFL tight ends. That gives McSorely an unfair advantage how?

Obviously the conditions favored a dual threat QB genius. It's no wonder the Vegas spread went in PSUs favor when the weather report came out. The fact remains McSorely was throwing poorly to and he has NFL WR's, not multiple 5'8" guys. McSorely stepped up and threw a pick 6 in clutch time, lmao.
 
#1-It really is astonishing how a guy like Stanley has morphed into Jake Christensen (spelling of his name?), bouncing balls to receivers or air-mailing wide open guys.

Let's hope he turns back into the Nate we know.
 
You really think Penn State was favored to win because of the rain, and not because they have been a top 10 team most of the year and are thought of as the better team?

Did you watch the game? Stanley was not throwing to "multiple 5'8 guys." Virtually all of his passes were to 6'5 future NFL tight ends. That gives McSorely an unfair advantage how?

First, I didn't say PSU was favored due to weather. Learn to read. I'll put it this way, bad weather favors a dual threat QB like McSorely and the spread moving in PSU's favor during the week wasn't surprising. McSorely was terrible throwing the ball to. Stanley had the worse game but McSorely's 11-25 with a pick 6 in clutch time is worth honorable mention, especially since he's throwing to PSU caliber WRs.

Second, Fant was out for several drives and was only targeted once before the 4th quarter. We had way too many plays with some combination of Easley, ISM and Groeneweg on the field at the same time. That doesn't work against a team like PSU. When Fant, Hockenson and Smith are all in the game, like in most of the 4th quarter, we look a lot better. Stanley played a bad game but you acting like you're some sort of genius is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
#1-It really is astonishing how a guy like Stanley has morphed into Jake Christensen (spelling of his name?), bouncing balls to receivers or air-mailing wide open guys.

Let's hope he turns back into the Nate we know.

That is exactly the QB comparison I was thinking about. Complete with opposing defenses completely disrespecting our passing game to the point where both safeties are crashing the LOS.

Now, Christianson never had the 300-yard or 6 TD games that Stanley has had, but that game Saturday was Christianson-esque.

He needed to be pulled out of the game shortly after airmailing the wide-open Hockensen. The option QB at Navy who throws 5 passes a year could have made that throw.

I am still anguished at this loss. I hope the players decide to take it out onnPurdue.
 
Top