IowaLaw's 3rd Quarter Report Card

IowaLawWasRight

Well-Known Member
In a season of highs and lows, the Hawks are sitting right where most thought they would be after 3 quarters of the season are complete. 6-3, with no unexpected wins or losses. We lost each of the big games that could have made us an upper echelon team, and won the games against the weaker opponents. We are favored to win all three games left this season (likely by double figures), and if all goes well, we end up 9-3. That would put us in a solid bowl game in large part to our schedule and not having to play OSU, Michigan, or Michigan State. So where do we stack up against the Big 10 after 3/4 of the season?

1. Total Offense - 9th (up from 10th after 1st Q) (D): The Hawkeye offense is averaging just 391 yards per game despite bringing back last year's top QB, WR, TEs, and most of the starting OL. While the opportunities have been there, they are often missed due to lack of execution, poor throws, missed blocks, or mental mistakes. The offense is frustrating to watch because the talent is out there but the mental game doesn't seem to be there.

2. Total Defense - 2nd (down from 1st after 1st Q) (A): The Hawks are giving up 284 yards per game. Opponents have scored just 21 touchdowns against us all year (2nd in the Big 10), and we are giving up just 4.7 yards per play (2nd in the Big 10). While there is a lot of youth on this defense, the leadership has been solid and they are keeping us in games in spite of our offense. Aside from maybe Michigan, we would have no problem competing with anyone in the conference this year.

3. Passing Offense - tied for 6th (6th after 1st Q) (C+): The Hawks are throwing for 235 passing yards per game. Stanley's completion percentage has dropped dramatically as the season has gone on (from 63% after the 1st quarter to just 57% now, a sign of inaccuracy similar to last year). While he's thrown 17 touchdowns (many in one blowout), his 8 interceptions are more than all but two Big 10 QBs. We have two of the top tight ends in college football, but it is not enough to have a legitimate passing attack this season.

4. Rushing Offense - 9th (down from 8th after 1st Q) (C-): We are averaging just 157 yards per game despite being a "power running" offense. Our yards per carry has dropped since earlier in the season from 4.1 yards per carry to just 3.9 yards and 11th in the Big 10. We have yet to have a 100 yard rusher in 9 games, and I'm not sure we've settled on a true #1 back. The good news is that all of the backs are sophomores and come back next year. The bad news is, the best sophomore back we had is running for 150 yards per game and 30 receiving yards per game at Arizona State.

5. Sacks - 4th (down from 3rd after 1st Q) (A-): While the talk of a record breaking sack year has died down since the 1st quarter, we have still accumulated 26 sacks to date. In comparison, we only had 27 sacks all last year. No one has been able to get a solid explanation why Epenesa doesn't play more than he does, but all of our DEs have played well. Putting pressure on the QB will be key in the coming weeks, as Northwestern's QBs always seem to burn us, and Nebraska has a mobile QB.

6. Punting - 12th (down from 3rd after 1st Q) (D-): The biggest statistical decline we have seen all season is at the punter position. Early on, Raestetter seemed like the team's biggest success story, showing a vast improvement over last year. It turns out, he's the same guy who finished 117th in the NCAA in punting last year. In spite of his regression to the mean, he has still taken every snap at punter this year. Last I checked, we had a scholarship punter on the roster who hasn't been heard from since the middle of last year. Regardless of who is out there, it is safe to say that the drastic drop in punting has killed us in field position and contributed to our two recent close losses.

7. Kick Returns - (unranked after 1st Q) 1st (A+): I searched far and wide to find a stat that the Hawks can feel great about, and found one in kick returns. While Smith-Marsette suffers from the drops at WR, and has made some questionable decisions this year, his electricity at kick returner cannot be questioned. He is averaging 28 yards per return, and every time he gets the ball back there he has a chance to take it to the house. It's unfortunate that they changed the kickoff rules in college football and most kicks sail through the end zone, as Marsette is as fun to watch out there as Wadley or DJK.
 
I am dumbfounded as to why Iowa can't run the ball.

Poor line. No stretching the field. Poor accuracy on passes. No screen passes. Mediocre running backs (serviceable. Probably missed a few things. Poor punting exchange puts Hawks deep in territory where passing is less and running is harder. Predictable running on first down...
 
Not saying that the defense has been bad, in fact it has been quite good. But I don't see an "A" grade after last weeks performance. Even though it's only one game.

As for Epenesa, he is a great talent, no doubt about it. But Parker Hesse has put together an outstanding year. He sniffs out plays probably better than anyone else on the team. I would put him on par with Jose Jewell in that regard. Then you have Anthony Nelson on the other side. Which one would you take out to get Epenesa more snaps?
 
Nice report Iowalaw. Very accurate. The offense is damn frustrating I must agree. Another year. Offense is not easy to accomplish at Iowa.
 
Nice report Iowalaw. Very accurate. The offense is damn frustrating I must agree. Another year. Offense is not easy to accomplish at Iowa.

This year has the feeling of 2014 where the offense could have been so much better. Jake was off and on in 14 and Nate is on and off this year. If you looked at the film of the 2017 in Ames against ISU Nate looked very comfortable under pressure in his first road game, a big rivalry game. He made big throws in that game
 
Spot on report.

7) Kick returns - It's just too bad that kick return is where Iowa is great and kicks ass over other teams. Unfortunately, it is an area of the game that many times is a play that comes after an opponents score. The success is really like pulling the wool over one's face as it often means that you may be chasing points.
 
Good summary, but Total Defense can't be an "A" when you give up the game winning drive and 4 TDs through the air in a critical game @ Purdue
 
Last edited:
a mobile QB would make all the difference for Iowa. For the life of me, I do not understand why Ferentz & Ferentz cannot figure that out. You MUST have a mobile QB in today's college football, and we are one of the few teams that refuse to implement it.

Stanley has very little ability to run with the ball!!! Frustrating
 
Good summary, but Total Defense can't be an "A" when you give up the game winning drive and 4 TDs through the air in a critical game @ Purdue

Agreed. The D has been very good overall but couldn't rise up in big moments against Wisconsin, PSU, or Purdue. The offense put them in horrible positions at times but as Norm used to say, they need to put out fires. And this year they haven't done so.
 
a mobile QB would make all the difference for Iowa. For the life of me, I do not understand why Ferentz & Ferentz cannot figure that out. You MUST have a mobile QB in today's college football, and we are one of the few teams that refuse to implement it.

Stanley has very little ability to run with the ball!!! Frustrating


If you must have a mobile quarterback - then you need 3. They rarely make it thru the season w/out missing games or losing effectiveness. The 'Bama's that have multiple agile QB's - that works. Iowa would never be able to recruit 3. McSorely is an abberation. A huge factor in last yr's Ohio St game was making JT Barrett keep the ball the 1st half - made plays, but wasn't effective the 2nd half as Iowa pounded on him. Minny, Illinois, Neb all have dual QB's.... Same reason they don't make it in the NFL - you need 3 - 3 equally replaceable.
 
a mobile QB would make all the difference for Iowa. For the life of me, I do not understand why Ferentz & Ferentz cannot figure that out. You MUST have a mobile QB in today's college football, and we are one of the few teams that refuse to implement it.

Stanley has very little ability to run with the ball!!! Frustrating

Tend to disagree with your premise on mobility. I actually think Stanley is very "mobile". Not that he's fast or even a dual threat but he's shown, many times, he's able to elude, more importantly, shed tacklers.

What he lacks is not ability but decision-making moxie. He strings out pass-plays waaay tooo long and eventually runs out of field and / or tries to force into an extremely small sideline window.

He needs to recognize the break-downs and when his receivers aren't going to get separation and get the F up field for cripes sake!! He's shown to be a punishing load that would get +yards every single time if he simply turned his roll outs into forward progress.

Stanley's issues aren't measurables or running ability, it's a complete lack of intellectual / emotional intangibles and accuracy. Unfortunately, he succumbs to the latter and is more often a liability than a contributing play-maker.
 
Stanley really needs to learn to use his weight. He always seems really tentative when he runs with the ball and somebody half his size can stuff him. He needs to run at the smaller corners and put his shoulder (left) into them, use that weight!
 
The punting decline has actually hurt us. I'm not sure what has happened, or why Gersonde hasn't gotten any looks (he was injured last year, but this year he is still listed in 2-deep), but Rastetter has lost whatever mojo he had earlier. The kid can pass, though. Still perfect completion percentage. What a QBR he must have!

But seriously, he should 1) NEVER be allowed to do a "conventional" punt, and 2) Maybe we need to use Gersonde for "long" punting?
 
The punting decline has actually hurt us. I'm not sure what has happened, or why Gersonde hasn't gotten any looks (he was injured last year, but this year he is still listed in 2-deep), but Rastetter has lost whatever mojo he had earlier. The kid can pass, though. Still perfect completion percentage. What a QBR he must have!

But seriously, he should 1) NEVER be allowed to do a "conventional" punt, and 2) Maybe we need to use Gersonde for "long" punting?

I agree with this, at least the punting part :). I believe they were trying to redshirt Gersonde but at this point, he hasn't played a game and could punt in all of our remaining games and not lose the year of eligibility. Rastetter started out the year doing well but he has been a big liability in the past several games.
 
Agreed. The D has been very good overall but couldn't rise up in big moments against Wisconsin, PSU, or Purdue. The offense put them in horrible positions at times but as Norm used to say, they need to put out fires. And this year they haven't done so.

that's been a frequent theme under KFz. Defense, save our azz cause the offense ain't gonna do it.
 
While the Defense has not been clutch at the very end of games, statistically, they remain one of the best in the country. Normal teams don't lose games when they only give up 14 points. Teams usually win those games by 20 points. Unfortunately, the Defense is not given anything to work with, given the worst punter in the Big 10 and an inept offensive coordinator who specializes in 3 and outs. In spite of all this, the Defense still ranks Second in the Big 10 in virtually all statistical categories and is worthy of an A rating. There are other teams in the country that would be undefeated if they had Iowa's defense.


Good summary, but Total Defense can't be an "A" when you give up the game winning drive and 4 TDs through the air in a critical game @ Purdue
 

Latest posts

Top