I don't get the Neilson thing. Hitchens is a much better option against this team.
C CAARHawk Banned Sep 24, 2011 #41 I don't get the Neilson thing. Hitchens is a much better option against this team.
T TChawk Banned Sep 24, 2011 #44 Well Iowa's D still looks like crap. Glad they made no strides during the week.
atxhawk Well-Known Member Sep 24, 2011 #47 atxhawk said: #*&^$)*)(*!&(*^)(*^^$!*&*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Click to expand...
big10fan Well-Known Member Sep 24, 2011 #48 getting old on D. would be nice to press up just a little.
big10fan Well-Known Member Sep 24, 2011 #49 if we can't hold them on a 3rd and 15, i don't know when we will
big10fan Well-Known Member Sep 24, 2011 #53 will be interesting to see if we come out throwing again. i say if it ain't broke, don't fix it, same be true if we were running it well.
will be interesting to see if we come out throwing again. i say if it ain't broke, don't fix it, same be true if we were running it well.
D Dragonhawk Banned Sep 24, 2011 #54 figures 1-4 on field goals nails 43 yd, now we see how they adjust the D next time they get the ball, it does appear the RD is getting better
figures 1-4 on field goals nails 43 yd, now we see how they adjust the D next time they get the ball, it does appear the RD is getting better
N NickM Well-Known Member Sep 24, 2011 #58 It's tough to account for the qb when you insist on playing two deep safeties against five receiver looks.
It's tough to account for the qb when you insist on playing two deep safeties against five receiver looks.
big10fan Well-Known Member Sep 24, 2011 #59 did we just go for it at midfield? honestly didn't expect that