earlkoppelman
Well-Known Member
A
Agree!A good season guarantees a ferentz around these parts for the next 30 years or so.
Agree!A good season guarantees a ferentz around these parts for the next 30 years or so.
Dude, '08 and '09 were against brutal schedules. Sports-reference.com has them at 21st and 8th toughest, respectively. Just off the top of my head you have a top 25 Pitt team, a top 20 MSU once, two top 5 PSU teams, one top 15 Wisconsin team, top 10 OSU, and a top 25 NW once.
'15 might have been weak, but the narrative that Iowa only has success against weak schedules is BS.
Dude, '08 and '09 were against brutal schedules. Sports-reference.com has them at 21st and 8th toughest, respectively. Just off the top of my head you have a top 25 Pitt team, a top 20 MSU once, two top 5 PSU teams, one top 15 Wisconsin team, top 10 OSU, and a top 25 NW once.
'15 might have been weak, but the narrative that Iowa only has success against weak schedules is BS.
That stretch from game 4 through game 8 is about as tough a 5 game stretch as you're going to find.
- @ preseason #5 PSU (night game)
- Ark State
- Michigan
- @ Wisc
- @ MSU (night game)
Brief glance at the FPI subcomponents:
Offense: 38
Defense: 21
Special Teams: 18
Going from last years final FPI
Season Ending Rank: 23rd
Overall Efficiency Rank: 33rd
Offense: 54
Defense: 22
Special Teams: 37
The defense would be about right if we our incoming linebackers can hold their own, but that's not a given. I have my reservations about the offense and special teams improving that much in the off-season though it doesn't seem like an impossible leap. I would say that this prediction is about right, but leaning towards optimistic.
Were you not alive when they were #1 for a while in 1985?Well they are always ranked somewhere. That's how perceptions work.
What's the best we had? Like 2 or 3rd a few times back in the 50's and 60's?
What we have before us is an opportunity.
Finished the season as.Were you not alive when they were #1 for a while in 1985?
Dude, '08 and '09 were against brutal schedules. Sports-reference.com has them at 21st and 8th toughest, respectively. Just off the top of my head you have a top 25 Pitt team, a top 20 MSU once, two top 5 PSU teams, one top 15 Wisconsin team, top 10 OSU, and a top 25 NW once.
'15 might have been weak, but the narrative that Iowa only has success against weak schedules is BS.
'02: Top 10 PSU and Michigan, and above average teams throughout the schedule.We finished 9-4(5-3) in ‘08. I’m talking about we we go on our BCS runs.
Top 25 Pitt - Loss
Top 20 MSU - Loss
Top 10 OSU - Loss
Top 25 NW - Loss
PSU and the Wisky wins were good wins. But this doesn’t change the fact that we prey on the weak in our “historic” seasons.
This one is simple, schedule. Iowa usually takes advantage of weak schedules. See 2015...basically every season since 05.
Will I ever live to see Iowa have a good season against an also tough schedule....I do not know.
That stretch included: Ark St, who finished 4-8. Michigan, 5-7. MSU, 6-7.
Yeah, that's a brutal stretch!
Gotta disagree here. Some of Iowa's worst seasons have come with easy schedules.
2007 was a joke schedule and Iowa flopped
2011 Iowa missed Ohio St and Wisconsin with Michigan and Michigan St and home.
2012 Iowa's didn't play a single opponent that ended the season in the top 15
2014 Finished 7-6 while only playing one ranked opponent
And some of their best teams have happened against their toughest schedules
2002 played their best opponents on the road (Michigan & Penn St, Minnesota even had a good year by their standards)
2009 played their best opponents on the road again (Ohio St, Penn St, Wisconsin)
2015 again played their toughest opponents on the road (Wisconsin, NW, ISU)
Finished the season as.
Granted things have changed, but one thing remains the same, it's the final score, the final standings that matter.
Everyone knows we took OSU to the wood shed last year, many remember the final score, but very few remember what the score was after the first quarter.
Been a hawk fan for a long long time.Who exactly are you??? Or I should write what kind of a troll are you??? you certainly are not a hawk fan.