Iowa Get's Some Sexy Back

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
If Iowa can keep moving up the chart on offense they may be able to make this a three-team race in the Big Ten West. Nebraska and Wisconsin took steps forward today, as did the Hawkeyes.

Iowa moved the ball effectively in the second half with CJ Beathard under center. Everything looked easier because everything was easier. Look at the vine I snapped below. This was the second offensive series of the second half, most notably after Damond Powell had beaten Pitt deep on the one-handed grab. Notice where the cornerback is over Powell and the cushion he is giving DP. Iowa receivers haven't seen that type of cushion all season and THIS is when Greg Davis' horizontal game can work. Also notice the first steps the cornerback takes after the snap; backwards..that's because Iowa took some shots deep:

[video]https://vine.co/v/O7B020qeuEe/embed/simple[/video]

Also note Iowa's offensive formation and position on the field; it was a Power-I set with a tight end on the LOS and one receiver on each side (Powell and Derrick Willies). The ball was on the left hash and Iowa's tendency is to run the ball to the short side of the field. That play may well have been called breaking the huddle, as I think this was probably a sight audible, given all that green out in front of Powell. Beathard had to earn some 'Ferentz Points' (No Monetary Value) with several decisions today. He made an audible that saw Mark Weisman score, he hit a check down after resisting the urge to go deep and he made a terrific play on third and seven, throwing as he was falling backwards and under duress to keep the drive alive and Iowa wound up scoring a touchdown as opposed to punting.

[video]https://vine.co/v/O7BLK0vPpUJ/embed/simple[/video]

Ferentz would say this, among other things, about Beathard, following the game:

"I'm just happy he played better today than he practiced Thursday. I'll just leave it at that, OK?"

One of the knocks I have heard against Beathard is that he has struggled with consistency in practice. Ferentz brought that out with that comment, or at least what he saw this week. But some players are just gamers and on this Saturday, Beathard rose to the occasion when the program needed someone to step up.

Iowa went for 9.9 yards per passing attempt in this game and it would have been much more than that if Powell had held on to a perfect strike from Jake Rudock in the first quarter that wound up as an unlucky interception. Clearly, Iowa made a 'point of emphasis' to attack downfield in this game.

The running game benefited from attacking vertically, too. Things were just less compressed because the defense had to respect Iowa's deep threat when Beathard was in there. It's going to be very tough to put that toothpaste back in the tube after the second half where Iowa scored points on its first three drives and the fourth drive was just Iowa trying to run off as much clock as possible and didn't throw a pass.

Iowa still has a long way to go and Beathard will likely make some mistakes...all quarterbacks do, including Ricky Stanzi's 15 TD passes to 14 INT's during his 10-game regular season in 2009 which saw Iowa win the Orange Bowl. But Saturday was a huge step. The defense, who was gutted in the first half, really dialed up the adjustments and pressure in the second half, while the line mostly shut down the talented James Connor.

A good day for the Hawkeyes and they desperately needed it.
 
We ran more play action in this game than I can remember us running in any game the last 3 years. Even saw a PA waggle that I hadn't seen since 2011. Must have broken out the KOK play book that's been sitting behind a glass case with a sign that says, "Break glass only in case of emergency!". :D
 
Yes, we were just sandbagging while getting to 2-1 by the skin of our teeth.


sandbagging and setting up tendencies are two different things. i'm not saying iowa was 'holding back' - i'm just saying if you see a team do something over and over on tape, then you expect that. iowa broke tendency on razor's first TD pass.....
 
sandbagging and setting up tendencies are two different things. i'm not saying iowa was 'holding back' - i'm just saying if you see a team do something over and over on tape, then you expect that. iowa broke tendency on razor's first TD pass.....

On the TD pass, sure. I thought you were referring to today's overall emphasis on attacking vertically, not just the TD pass (which was certainly a brilliant play call). Breaking their short yardage situation tendencies was a good thing today. But I definitely don't think the rest of the offense's putrid performance through three games was designed simply to set up tendencies for the future.
 
On the TD pass, sure. I thought you were referring to today's overall emphasis on attacking vertically, not just the TD pass (which was certainly a brilliant play call). Breaking their short yardage situation tendencies was a good thing today. But I definitely don't think the rest of the offense's putrid performance through three games was designed simply to set up tendencies for the future.


setting up tendencies isn't about executing poorly. doing the same thing really well sets tendencies too - i'm not saying they intentionally played like crap to set tendencies. not saying that at all.

early in the kf era - a certain player would always come in on 3rd down (full back type player) and people would complain that would tip a pass, or something like that. isn't that what you are supposed to do as an offense - that is subtle, but you pick your spots and do something against the grain when necessary.....setting up tendencies. they do it will formations all the time, as the season progresses.
 
My all time favorite "go against tendency play" was 2002 against Wisky. Everything about the formation, down and distance said "bubble screen" and the Wisky dback jumped it only to find that it was a double move bubble screen that the receiver basically walked in from like 50 yds out. Every now and then KOKwould pull something like that....
 
Jon - who did you think will be qb next week? Your post is worded in such a way that makes me believe you think it'll be cjb...I'm not as convinced based on kf's comments/track record.
 
early in the kf era - a certain player would always come in on 3rd down (full back type player) and people would complain that would tip a pass, or something like that. isn't that what you are supposed to do as an offense - that is subtle, but you pick your spots and do something against the grain when necessary.....setting up tendencies. they do it will formations all the time, as the season progresses.

2003 Edgar Cervantes. V Michigan, whenever they saw him come in on third down, they brought their nickel package in because he rarely got the ball
 
If Iowa can continue to improve defensively then they can afford to live with a Stanzi-like performance of 15 TDs and 14 INTs. Probably part of the reason why it has been Rudock over Beathard is that the defense came into the season as a question mark and quite frankly still is. Pitt had a great rushing game, but questionable passing game. One half does not a season make. Hopefully the D will continue to improve and will be able to withstand a balanced quality offense.
 
Jon - who did you think will be qb next week? Your post is worded in such a way that makes me believe you think it'll be cjb...I'm not as convinced based on kf's comments/track record.

This isn't a cop out, since you asked me who I THINK will start, as opposed to who I would start...I could see either QB starting. If I had to wager, I would say Rudock if healthy but there is a plan for CJB to come in the game and play throughout.

If that happens, I won't be a big fan of it, unless it's to bring CJB along more...because there is nothing Rudock can do that CJB can't, but the reverse is not true. So I wouldn't want to play both for an extended period of time.
 
Jon, would agree have not seen that kind of cushion. Normally we run that play to KVM, and get a yard or so, with no threat. If DP gets that kind of cushion can get 10 anytime he wants with his speed, and then it opens up running and passing as well. On your 2nd clip great throw, and nice blitz pickup from Damon Bullock. Hawks really showed signs of life in the 2nd half, both offense, defense, special team, and coaching staff. Should give us some confidence heading into Big Ten play.
 
I think the 3rd down throw just as he got hit, tells a good tale, for me. CJ showed the, talent, awareness, moxie, grit and stones to hang in the pocket under a blitz, not get happy feet and continue through his progressions and at the last second make a laser throw to Hamilton for a first down. Let's not forget that CJ got drilled on that play.

That was a veteran play and with my untrained eye, showed me that CJ has very good command of the offense. It sure felt like he "knew" that receiver "should" be there and he had the where-with-all to wait for him to come open.

Granted, that play could have wound up as a sack, incompletion or a pick and KF would be wondering why CJ didn't just throw it away. But I believe this is the type of "risk" the players love and that KF hates. I can understand KF's position, but players play. CJ looks like he is a player and the evidence from yesterday points to the rest of the team believing that, as well. CJ sure looked like the kick-start Iowa's offense needed.
 
My all time favorite "go against tendency play" was 2002 against Wisky. Everything about the formation, down and distance said "bubble screen" and the Wisky dback jumped it only to find that it was a double move bubble screen that the receiver basically walked in from like 50 yds out. Every now and then KOKwould pull something like that....

I remember that play. Was brilliant.
 
I still have a hard time using the words Iowa and sexy in the same sentence 8 days after getting beat by Iowa State, especially in Kinnick. About all Iowa did yesterday was give me hope that they might get bowl eligible (yes, I have low standards).
 

Latest posts

Top