Not necessarily. If one of the losses is to a program, like oh, I don't know, say Western Michigan or North Dakota State, you can still go 7-6 and play .500 or better ball against the P5.
Good point
Not necessarily. If one of the losses is to a program, like oh, I don't know, say Western Michigan or North Dakota State, you can still go 7-6 and play .500 or better ball against the P5.
Sideline mics / camera pick up BF telling his offense now we're going to "run it down their fucking throats", and Iowa comes out in 2 TE 1 FB sets and proceeds to run three straight plays for 5 yards.
This is a silver-lining I've seen this year, is that we are drastically improved on 3rd down, and have been surprisingly successful on 3rd and 15+, which I believe we have converted 4 of already this season.I'm giving them five yards on the QB sneak out of shotgun on 3rd & 20
So as long as people defend a loser like Sandusky he becomes notable. Got it . Sorry for not following that logic.[/QUOT
No one defended him here. He was listed as "notable" in a hawkeye post. Not sure if you're grasping the satirical nature of the original point.