Hopefully not a fumble, then a PSU field goal, which will put the game out of reach.Anyway
24-10. Iowa
Either Iowa wins by double digits or they lose by double digits. Not expecting a close game here. Iowa’s opening drive will tell me everything I need to know.
Does that mean Gang Lu is a notable U of Iowa alum?? I've always thought of notable as someone who was worthy.
So as long as people defend a loser like Sandusky he becomes notable. Got it . Sorry for not following that logic.No one defended Gang Lu. Try to keep up.
Alumnus is singularWho gives a wet shart who the notable alumni is?
Hopefully PSU will be a Kirk and Brian Resurrection Game! Iowa needs a couple of picks.I am kind of hoping that the Michigan game was the low point for Iowa's offensive line play. Michigan's defensive alignment is kind of a hybrid 4-3 or 3-4 depending on who they are playing. 3-4 defenses with a lot of blitzing has given Iowa problems before. I am hoping Penn State's 4-3 defense is something Iowa's blockers are a bit more familiar with.
Still, I think Iowa is somewhat over matched, Penn State 20 Iowa 13.
You made me go look, that is funny, but makes me wonder if you are into crazy people like the Unabomber whom you listed. Rob, where has your wife been lately? She seems to have vanished.
I think the Michigan game just shows where we stack up. We beat up on lousy teams, all the homers predict domination all season, then when we play someone decent we find out we are average. We couldn't run against an average ISU, and didn't exactly throttle Miami of Ohio or Rutgers until they wore down in the second half. So we beat up on a horrible MTSU team that put 21 points on Michigan. Now, we have one running back that belongs in our back field, and that is Goodson. The others are now B1G level backs. There have been some creases that they should have taken advantage of for big runs, but are just so slow they can't get through the hole in time to break free. As far as pass protection, well we have an absolute statue at qb that takes forever to make a decision so that doesn't help the line out either. Combine that with an OC that has no clue what he is doing, and no business having the job, and you get what you see on the field for an offense. PSU defense is much much better than Michigan, and they don't even need to blitz to bring pressure. Our line is not good, and hasn't been for quite some time. It is a talking point for announcers because what else are they going to talk about?I am kind of hoping that the Michigan game was the low point for Iowa's offensive line play. Michigan's defensive alignment is kind of a hybrid 4-3 or 3-4 depending on who they are playing. 3-4 defenses with a lot of blitzing has given Iowa problems before. I am hoping Penn State's 4-3 defense is something Iowa's blockers are a bit more familiar with.
Still, I think Iowa is somewhat over matched, Penn State 20 Iowa 13.
I am kind of hoping that the Michigan game was the low point for Iowa's offensive line play. Michigan's defensive alignment is kind of a hybrid 4-3 or 3-4 depending on who they are playing. 3-4 defenses with a lot of blitzing has given Iowa problems before. I am hoping Penn State's 4-3 defense is something Iowa's blockers are a bit more familiar with.
Still, I think Iowa is somewhat over matched, Penn State 20 Iowa 13.
I think the Michigan game just shows where we stack up. We beat up on lousy teams, all the homers predict domination all season, then when we play someone decent we find out we are average. We couldn't run against an average ISU, and didn't exactly throttle Miami of Ohio or Rutgers until they wore down in the second half. So we beat up on a horrible MTSU team that put 21 points on Michigan. Now, we have one running back that belongs in our back field, and that is Goodson. The others are now B1G level backs. There have been some creases that they should have taken advantage of for big runs, but are just so slow they can't get through the hole in time to break free. As far as pass protection, well we have an absolute statue at qb that takes forever to make a decision so that doesn't help the line out either. Combine that with an OC that has no clue what he is doing, and no business having the job, and you get what you see on the field for an offense. PSU defense is much much better than Michigan, and they don't even need to blitz to bring pressure. Our line is not good, and hasn't been for quite some time. It is a talking point for announcers because what else are they going to talk about?
I agree on your comment regarding first drive...I think it's more 1st Q but I hear ya! I'd be stunned from last week's performance if we score 24 points but I do think our D could post another 10 game for the oppositions offense.Anyway
24-10. Iowa
Either Iowa wins by double digits or they lose by double digits. Not expecting a close game here. Iowa’s opening drive will tell me everything I need to know.
This is the 7-5 contract coaching we get after GB's brilliant contract move....Kirk just make us bowl eligible and I'll see to it you make more money than almost all your peers and you never have to win or participate in a conference championship...just get me 7-5 and I can keep feeding the alumni and supporters bullshit.I think the Michigan game just shows where we stack up. We beat up on lousy teams, all the homers predict domination all season, then when we play someone decent we find out we are average. We couldn't run against an average ISU, and didn't exactly throttle Miami of Ohio or Rutgers until they wore down in the second half. So we beat up on a horrible MTSU team that put 21 points on Michigan. Now, we have one running back that belongs in our back field, and that is Goodson. The others are now B1G level backs. There have been some creases that they should have taken advantage of for big runs, but are just so slow they can't get through the hole in time to break free. As far as pass protection, well we have an absolute statue at qb that takes forever to make a decision so that doesn't help the line out either. Combine that with an OC that has no clue what he is doing, and no business having the job, and you get what you see on the field for an offense. PSU defense is much much better than Michigan, and they don't even need to blitz to bring pressure. Our line is not good, and hasn't been for quite some time. It is a talking point for announcers because what else are they going to talk about?
When the goal posts are moved then he doesn’t need to defend what he says. He gets to change it when necessary.So did the narrative on Michigan change? I thought you'd said they were mediocre in another thread and now they're "decent"? I can't keep up.
Ahh yes. You care more about winning than the football coach. Got it.This is the 7-5 contract coaching we get after GB's brilliant contract move....Kirk just make us bowl eligible and I'll see to it you make more money than almost all your peers and you never have to win or participate in a conference championship...just get me 7-5 and I can keep feeding the alumni and supporters bullshit.
Just so we are clear troll here's my priority:Ahh yes. You care more about winning than the football coach. Got it.
This is the 7-5 contract coaching we get after GB's brilliant contract move....Kirk just make us bowl eligible and I'll see to it you make more money than almost all your peers and you never have to win or participate in a conference championship...just get me 7-5 and I can keep feeding the alumni and supporters bullshit.
This never gets old. Seriously 7 win bonus. Does Barta realize that a 7-6 record with the way Iowa's schedules are currently constructed = a losing record against P5 opponents?