You would agree that Kansas is a get out and run team, right? Did they do much of that the other night? No. UNI dictated the tempo of that game.
UNI didn't just beat Kansas. They practically dominated them up until Kansas started pressing (again, they dictated the tempo, as Kansas almost never presses). Kansas' only lead was 2-0. I'm sorry, but this UNI team would finish no worse than 5th in the Big Ten. It's one thing to get up for a game like this and make a buzzer beater to win or something. But holding the nation's #1 team to 15 points below their scoring average, and allowing that same #1 team to hold the lead for all of 47 seconds is beyond impressive. That's just flat out revealing.
Oh yeah, having a coach on the Iowa sidelines wearing a NC ring would not go over to well with recruits or the existing players. /sarcasm
Come on TooLegit reconsider this statement. A long shot of this ever happening but if UNI somehow won the NC then you could forget him coaching Iowa anyway as he would have better offers. Just getting UNI to the sweet 16 is going to make him an attractive candidate to a number of jobs.
To say a mid-major won't be able to recruit at the BCS level uses faulty logic. I'm sure there are many cases of coaches making the jump and recruiting well.
.
I also dont think they would beat Kansas more than 2 out of 10 times if they played in a nuetral or 5 home and 5 away series.
I would agree with you if they hadn't played the way they did. If it had been a buzzer-beater type game, then I would agree. But Kansas led for 47 SECONDS!!!! 2-0!!! That's it! I'd give UNI a 4-6 record in neutral site/home and home. Keep in mind, the game in OKC was basically a home game for Kansas, as the crowd was dominated by KU fans.
You can make the argument that Kansas should have been as "up" for this game as UNI but, in all likelihood, they were not. UNI should be proud but Kansas got caught looking ahead. 4-6? Ridiculous.
And they would have been anymore "up" in a regular season game, where a loss isn't the end of your season? I highly doubt that. When Kansas' only lead is 2-0, there was much, much more involved than just "looking ahead".
Maybe, but if UNI was playing Kansas twice a year for five years, do you realistically think they're going to win more than 2 of those games? Personally, I wouldn't expect them to win any of them. Or 10 games in 1 season? I don't care if UNI won the first of 10 or the second to last of ten. There wouldn't be any losses following it.
This is such a ridiculous conversation. Iowa won at Kansas years back. That team wouldn't have repeated itself and the college basketball world hasn't changed. Kansas is still enjoying one of the seats at the head table and Iowa, UNI, or any other team with a fluke win over them isn't taking their seat or even challenging for it.
I'm not saying that the program would stack up over a 10 game series. But THIS YEAR'S team could win 4 games out of ten.
While we can't agree on who would win those games, at least we can agree that no one will win this debate...